Sandrine J Faivre1, Anthony J Olszanski2, Karin Weigang-Köhler3, Hanno Riess4, Roger B Cohen5, Xuejing Wang6, Scott P Myrand6, Enaksha R Wickremsinhe6, Candice L Horn6, Haojun Ouyang6, Sophie Callies6, Karim A Benhadji7, Eric Raymond8,9. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France. 2. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Medizinische Klinik 5, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany. 4. Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charite Campus Virchow Hospital, Berlin, Germany. 5. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 7. Medical Oncology, Lilly France, Neuilly-sur Seine Cedex, France. 8. Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France. prof.raymond@gmail.com. 9. Hospital Beaujon, 100 Bd du General Leclerc, 92118, Clichy, France. prof.raymond@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This Phase-I-study aimed to determine the recommended Phase-II-dosing-schedule of LY2334737, an oral gemcitabine prodrug, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Pharmacokinetics, cytokeratin-18 (CK18) levels, genetic polymorphisms, and antitumor activity were additionally evaluated. METHODS: Patients received escalating doses of LY2334737 either every other day for 21 days (d) followed by 7 days-drug-free period (QoD-arm) or once daily for 7 days every other week (QD-arm). The 28 days-cycles were repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation was succeeded by a dose-confirmation phase (12 additional patients to be enrolled on the maximum tolerated dose [MTD]). RESULTS: Forty-one patients received QoD- (40-100 mg) and 32 QD-dosing (40-90 mg). On QoD, 3/9 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on the 100 mg dose (2 × G3 diarrhea, 1 × G3 transaminase increase); 1 additional DLT (G3 diarrhea) occurred during dose confirmation at 90 mg (12 patients). On QD, 1 patient each experienced DLTs on 60 mg (G3 transaminase increase) and 80 mg (G3 prolonged QTcF-interval); 2/7 patients had 3 DLTs on the 90 mg dose (diarrhea, edema, liver-failure; all G3). The MTD was established at 90 mg for the QoD-arm. Seven patients on QoD and 4 on QD achieved SD (no CR + PR). Pharmacokinetics showed a dose-proportional increase in exposure of LY2334737 and dFdC without accumulation after repeated dosing. Significant increases in CK18 levels were observed. Genetic polymorphism of the cytidine deaminase gene (rs818202) could be associated with ≥ G3 hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Both schedules displayed linear pharmacokinetics and acceptable safety profiles. The recommended dose and schedule of LY2334737 for subsequent Phase-II-studies is 90 mg given QoD for 21 day.
BACKGROUND: This Phase-I-study aimed to determine the recommended Phase-II-dosing-schedule of LY2334737, an oral gemcitabine prodrug, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Pharmacokinetics, cytokeratin-18 (CK18) levels, genetic polymorphisms, and antitumor activity were additionally evaluated. METHODS:Patients received escalating doses of LY2334737 either every other day for 21 days (d) followed by 7 days-drug-free period (QoD-arm) or once daily for 7 days every other week (QD-arm). The 28 days-cycles were repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation was succeeded by a dose-confirmation phase (12 additional patients to be enrolled on the maximum tolerated dose [MTD]). RESULTS: Forty-one patients received QoD- (40-100 mg) and 32 QD-dosing (40-90 mg). On QoD, 3/9 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on the 100 mg dose (2 × G3 diarrhea, 1 × G3 transaminase increase); 1 additional DLT (G3 diarrhea) occurred during dose confirmation at 90 mg (12 patients). On QD, 1 patient each experienced DLTs on 60 mg (G3 transaminase increase) and 80 mg (G3 prolonged QTcF-interval); 2/7 patients had 3 DLTs on the 90 mg dose (diarrhea, edema, liver-failure; all G3). The MTD was established at 90 mg for the QoD-arm. Seven patients on QoD and 4 on QD achieved SD (no CR + PR). Pharmacokinetics showed a dose-proportional increase in exposure of LY2334737 and dFdC without accumulation after repeated dosing. Significant increases in CK18 levels were observed. Genetic polymorphism of the cytidine deaminase gene (rs818202) could be associated with ≥ G3 hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Both schedules displayed linear pharmacokinetics and acceptable safety profiles. The recommended dose and schedule of LY2334737 for subsequent Phase-II-studies is 90 mg given QoD for 21 day.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stijn L W Koolen; Petronella O Witteveen; Robert S Jansen; Marlies H G Langenberg; Roelien H Kronemeijer; Annemarie Nol; Ignacio Garcia-Ribas; Sophie Callies; Karim A Benhadji; Christopher A Slapak; Jos H Beijnen; Emile E Voest; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jeffrey R Infante; Karim A Benhadji; Grace K Dy; Gerald Fetterly; Wen Wee Ma; Johanna Bendell; Sophie Callies; Alex A Adjei Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Barry S Lutzke; Barry R Jones; Gary A Schultz; Angela B Freeman; Susan E Pratt; Angela M Bones; Bradley L Ackermann Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Margaret Tempero; William Plunkett; Veronique Ruiz Van Haperen; John Hainsworth; Howard Hochster; Renato Lenzi; James Abbruzzese Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Susan E Pratt; Sara Durland-Busbice; Robert L Shepard; Gregory P Donoho; James J Starling; Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Everett J Perkins; Anne H Dantzig Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Ramon Salazar; Serafin Morales; Marta Gil-Martín; Elena Aguirre; Ana Oaknin; Margarita Garcia; Sophie Callies; Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Karim A Benhadji; Antonio Llombart Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: J L Abbruzzese; R Grunewald; E A Weeks; D Gravel; T Adams; B Nowak; S Mineishi; P Tarassoff; W Satterlee; M N Raber Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1991-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caixia Wang; Yuanqiang Zheng; Michael A Sand Oval; Solange A Valdes; Zhe Chen; Dharmika S Lansakara-P; Maolin Du; Yanchun Shi; Zhengrong Cui Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-09-23
Authors: Sarah P Blagden; Ivana Rizzuto; Puvan Suppiah; Daniel O'Shea; Markand Patel; Laura Spiers; Ajithkumar Sukumaran; Nishat Bharwani; Andrea Rockall; Hani Gabra; Mona El-Bahrawy; Harpreet Wasan; Robert Leonard; Nagy Habib; Essam Ghazaly Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 7.640