Literature DB >> 26377590

Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic evaluation of two different schedules of LY2334737, an oral gemcitabine prodrug, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Sandrine J Faivre1, Anthony J Olszanski2, Karin Weigang-Köhler3, Hanno Riess4, Roger B Cohen5, Xuejing Wang6, Scott P Myrand6, Enaksha R Wickremsinhe6, Candice L Horn6, Haojun Ouyang6, Sophie Callies6, Karim A Benhadji7, Eric Raymond8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This Phase-I-study aimed to determine the recommended Phase-II-dosing-schedule of LY2334737, an oral gemcitabine prodrug, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Pharmacokinetics, cytokeratin-18 (CK18) levels, genetic polymorphisms, and antitumor activity were additionally evaluated.
METHODS: Patients received escalating doses of LY2334737 either every other day for 21 days (d) followed by 7 days-drug-free period (QoD-arm) or once daily for 7 days every other week (QD-arm). The 28 days-cycles were repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation was succeeded by a dose-confirmation phase (12 additional patients to be enrolled on the maximum tolerated dose [MTD]).
RESULTS: Forty-one patients received QoD- (40-100 mg) and 32 QD-dosing (40-90 mg). On QoD, 3/9 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on the 100 mg dose (2 × G3 diarrhea, 1 × G3 transaminase increase); 1 additional DLT (G3 diarrhea) occurred during dose confirmation at 90 mg (12 patients). On QD, 1 patient each experienced DLTs on 60 mg (G3 transaminase increase) and 80 mg (G3 prolonged QTcF-interval); 2/7 patients had 3 DLTs on the 90 mg dose (diarrhea, edema, liver-failure; all G3). The MTD was established at 90 mg for the QoD-arm. Seven patients on QoD and 4 on QD achieved SD (no CR + PR). Pharmacokinetics showed a dose-proportional increase in exposure of LY2334737 and dFdC without accumulation after repeated dosing. Significant increases in CK18 levels were observed. Genetic polymorphism of the cytidine deaminase gene (rs818202) could be associated with ≥ G3 hepatotoxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Both schedules displayed linear pharmacokinetics and acceptable safety profiles. The recommended dose and schedule of LY2334737 for subsequent Phase-II-studies is 90 mg given QoD for 21 day.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oral gemcitabine prodrug; Pharmacogenomics; Pharmacokinetics; Phase I study; Solid tumors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26377590     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-015-0286-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  24 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Phase I study of Oral gemcitabine prodrug (LY2334737) alone and in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Stijn L W Koolen; Petronella O Witteveen; Robert S Jansen; Marlies H G Langenberg; Roelien H Kronemeijer; Annemarie Nol; Ignacio Garcia-Ribas; Sophie Callies; Karim A Benhadji; Christopher A Slapak; Jos H Beijnen; Emile E Voest; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Phase 1b study of the oral gemcitabine 'Pro-drug' LY2334737 in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Infante; Karim A Benhadji; Grace K Dy; Gerald Fetterly; Wen Wee Ma; Johanna Bendell; Sophie Callies; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Gemcitabine versus Modified Gemcitabine: a review of several promising chemical modifications.

Authors:  Elodie Moysan; Guillaume Bastiat; Jean-Pierre Benoit
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Quantification of gemcitabine incorporation into human DNA by LC/MS/MS as a surrogate measure for target engagement.

Authors:  Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Barry S Lutzke; Barry R Jones; Gary A Schultz; Angela B Freeman; Susan E Pratt; Angela M Bones; Bradley L Ackermann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret Tempero; William Plunkett; Veronique Ruiz Van Haperen; John Hainsworth; Howard Hochster; Renato Lenzi; James Abbruzzese
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Efficacy of low-dose oral metronomic dosing of the prodrug of gemcitabine, LY2334737, in human tumor xenografts.

Authors:  Susan E Pratt; Sara Durland-Busbice; Robert L Shepard; Gregory P Donoho; James J Starling; Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Everett J Perkins; Anne H Dantzig
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 6.261

8.  Phase 1 dose escalation and pharmacokinetic evaluation of oral gemcitabine prodrug (LY2334737) in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Ramon Salazar; Serafin Morales; Marta Gil-Martín; Elena Aguirre; Ana Oaknin; Margarita Garcia; Sophie Callies; Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Karim A Benhadji; Antonio Llombart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine.

Authors:  J L Abbruzzese; R Grunewald; E A Weeks; D Gravel; T Adams; B Nowak; S Mineishi; P Tarassoff; W Satterlee; M N Raber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE).

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  6 in total

1.  Drug repurposing of pyrimidine analogs as potent antiviral compounds against human enterovirus A71 infection with potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Jialei Sun; Thinesshwary Yogarajah; Regina Ching Hua Lee; Parveen Kaur; Masafumi Inoue; Yong Wah Tan; Justin Jang Hann Chu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Pharmacogenomics Testing in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials: Constructive Criticism Is Warranted.

Authors:  Tristan M Sissung; William D Figg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  The evolution of nucleosidic analogues: self-assembly of prodrugs into nanoparticles for cancer drug delivery.

Authors:  Milad Baroud; Elise Lepeltier; Sylvain Thepot; Yolla El-Makhour; Olivier Duval
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of Gemcitabine as a mainstay in adult and pediatric oncology: an EORTC-PAMM perspective.

Authors:  Joseph Ciccolini; Cindy Serdjebi; Godefridus J Peters; Elisa Giovannetti
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Oral 4-(N)-stearoyl gemcitabine nanoparticles inhibit tumor growth in mouse models.

Authors:  Caixia Wang; Yuanqiang Zheng; Michael A Sand Oval; Solange A Valdes; Zhe Chen; Dharmika S Lansakara-P; Maolin Du; Yanchun Shi; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-23

6.  Anti-tumour activity of a first-in-class agent NUC-1031 in patients with advanced cancer: results of a phase I study.

Authors:  Sarah P Blagden; Ivana Rizzuto; Puvan Suppiah; Daniel O'Shea; Markand Patel; Laura Spiers; Ajithkumar Sukumaran; Nishat Bharwani; Andrea Rockall; Hani Gabra; Mona El-Bahrawy; Harpreet Wasan; Robert Leonard; Nagy Habib; Essam Ghazaly
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.