| Literature DB >> 26377213 |
Fei Tian1, Zhansheng Wu2, Yanbin Tong1, Zhilin Wu3, Giancarlo Cravotto3.
Abstract
A microwave-assisted sol-gel method was used to synthesizeEntities:
Keywords: Active carbon; Codoped AC/TiO2; Formaldehyde; Microwave irradiation; Photocatalytic degradation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26377213 PMCID: PMC4573084 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-015-1061-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1XRD patterns of undoped, Fe-doped, and N-doped TiO2. A refers to the anatase crystal, R refers to the rutile crystal
Powders with different dopant concentrations
| Samples | Anatase size (nm) | Rutile size (nm) | Ratio of A and R % |
|---|---|---|---|
| AC/TiO2 | 17.9 | 22.9 | 47/53 |
| 0.008 Fe-AC/TiO2 | 19.6 | 24.1 | 49/51 |
| 0.01 Fe-AC/TiO2 | 21.6 | 25.8 | 59/41 |
| 0.012 Fe-AC/TiO2 | 32.4 | 39.3 | 33/67 |
| 0.2 N-AC/TiO2 | 15.4 | 11.5 | 72/28 |
| 0.4 N-AC/TiO2 | 17.2 | 18.6 | 62/38 |
| 0.6 N-AC/TiO2 | 18.8 | 16.3 | 69/31 |
Fig. 2PL spectra of undoped, Fe-doped, and N-doped AC/TiO2 powders with different dopant concentrations
Fig. 3Effect of Fe/N doping content in AC/TiO2 on HCHO degradation. ([HCHO] = 30 mg/L, volume of HCHO = 50 mL, photocatalyst amount = 50 mg)
Fig. 4XRD patterns of undoped, 0.01 Fe-doped, 0.4 N-doped, and 0.01 Fe–0.4 N-codoped AC/TiO2 powders
Fig. 5Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore size distribution curves (inset) of undoped, 0.4 N-doped, 0.01 Fe-doped, and 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-codoped AC/TiO2 powders
Physicochemical properties of undoped, mono-doped and co-doped AC/TiO2 powders
| Samples | Anatase size (nm) | Rutile size (nm) | SBET (m2/g) | Band gap (eV) | Ratio of A and R % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC/TiO2 | 17.9 | 22.9 | 532 | 2.86 | 47/53 |
| 0.4 N-AC/TiO2 | 17.2 | 18.6 | 487 | 2.81 | 62/38 |
| 0.01 Fe-AC/TiO2 | 21.6 | 25.8 | 562 | 2.79 | 59/41 |
| 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-AC/TiO2 | 19.3 | 23.4 | 550 | 2.58 | 57/43 |
Fig. 6SEM images of undoped, 0.4 N-doped, 0.01 Fe-doped, and 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-codoped AC/TiO2 powders
Fig. 7TEM images of undoped, 0.4 N-doped, 0.01 Fe-doped, and 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-codoped AC/TiO2 powders
Fig. 8FTIR spectra of undoped, 0.4 N-doped, 0.01 Fe-doped, and 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-codoped AC/TiO2 powders
Fig. 9XPS spectra of undoped, 0.4 N-doped, 0.01 Fe-doped, and 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-codoped AC/TiO2 powders: (a) Ti2p, (b) O1s, (c) Fe2p and N1s
Fig. 10Diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectra of undoped, 0.4 N-doped, 0.01 Fe-doped, and 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-codoped AC/TiO2 powders
Fig. 11Comparison of photocatalytic degradation of HCHO under light irradiation in presence of undoped, 0.4 N-doped, 0.01 Fe-doped, and 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-codoped AC/TiO2 ([HCHO] = 30 mg/L, volume of HCHO = 50 mL, photocatalyst amount = 50 mg)
Fig. 12Photoluminescence emission spectra of undoped, 0.4 N-doped, 0.01 Fe-doped, and 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-codoped AC/TiO2 powders
Fig. 13Repetitive use of undoped, 0.4 N-doped, 0.01 Fe-doped, and 0.4 N-0.01 Fe-codoped AC/TiO2 photocatalyst ([HCHO] = 30 mg/L, volume of HCHO = 50 mL, photocatalyst amount = 50 mg)