| Literature DB >> 24405975 |
Mojtaba Safari, Rasoul Talebi, Mohammad Hossein Rostami1, Manouchehr Nikazar, Mitra Dadvar.
Abstract
In this study the optimum conditions for preparing the iron-doped TiO2 nanoparticles were investigated. Samples were synthesized by sol-gel impregnation method. Three effective parameters were optimized using Taguchi method, consisted of: (i) atomic ratios of Fe to Ti; (ii) sintering temperature; (iii) sintering time. The characterization of samples was determined using X-ray diffraction, BET- specific surface area, UV- Vis reflectance spectra (DRS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The XRD patterns of the samples indicated the existence of anatase crystal phase in structure. UV- Vis reflectance spectra showed an enhancement in light absorbance in the visible region (wavelength > 400 nm) for iron-doped samples. The photocatalytic activity of samples was investigated by the degradation of RO 16 (RO 16) dye under UV irradiation. The results illustrated that the photocatalytic activity of iron-doped TiO2 was more than pure TiO2, because of the smaller crystal size, grater BET surface area and higher light absorption ability.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24405975 PMCID: PMC3896702 DOI: 10.1186/2052-336X-12-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Figure 1RO 16chemical structure.
Controllable parameters and their levels
| A | atomic ratios of Fe to Ti (%) | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.05 |
| B | Temperature of calcination (°C) | 550 | 450 | 500 |
| C | Time of calcination (h) | 10 | 5 | 7.5 |
Test conditions
| Test 1 | 0.1 | 450 | 5 |
| Test 2 | 0.1 | 500 | 7.5 |
| Test 3 | 0.1 | 550 | 10 |
| Test 4 | 0.05 | 450 | 7.5 |
| Test 5 | 0.05 | 500 | 10 |
| Test 6 | 0.05 | 550 | 5 |
| Test 7 | 0.2 | 450 | 10 |
| Test 8 | 0.2 | 500 | 5 |
| Test 9 | 0.2 | 550 | 7.5 |
Figure 2Schematic representation of photoreactor.
Figure 3XRD patterns of some test1-test9 samples.
Particle characteristics of the undoped and doped TiO
| Test 1 | Anatase | 11.46 | 76.34 |
| Test 2 | - | - | 60.34 |
| Test 3 | - | - | 42.13 |
| Test 4 | - | - | 66.61 |
| Test 5 | - | - | 48.39 |
| Test 6 | Anatase | 22.92 | 39.59 |
| Test 7 | Anatase | 10.77 | 80.47 |
| Test 8 | - | - | 55.69 |
| Test 9 | - | - | 42.93 |
| TiO2 | Anatase | 18.85 | 41.2 |
Figure 4SEM images of some samples.
Figure 5The UV–vis reflectance spectra of some samples.
Theratio of each test
| Test 1 | 0.1 | 450 | 5 | 93 | 92 | 94 | 39.3687 |
| Test 2 | 0.1 | 500 | 7.5 | 92.0 | 94.0 | 93.0 | 38.9113 |
| Test 3 | 0.1 | 550 | 10 | 87.2 | 89.4 | 88.1 | 37.9841 |
| Test 4 | 0.05 | 450 | 7.5 | 80.4 | 79.0 | 78.5 | 38.7957 |
| Test 5 | 0.05 | 500 | 10 | 88.2 | 86.0 | 87.0 | 38.0777 |
| Test 6 | 0.05 | 550 | 5 | 81.5 | 79.0 | 80.0 | 37.8086 |
| Test 7 | 0.2 | 450 | 10 | 79.0 | 76.0 | 78.2 | 39.0261 |
| Test 8 | 0.2 | 500 | 5 | 88.5 | 90.0 | 89.7 | 38.1667 |
| Test 9 | 0.2 | 550 | 7.5 | 82.5 | 79.5 | 81.0 | 37.0562 |
| TiO2 | - | 450 | 4 | 72.4 | 70.8 | 69.87 | - |
S/N ratio response table
| | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.3687 | 38.9113 | 37.9841 | 38.7547 | |
| 38.7957 | 38.0777 | 37.8086 | 38.22 | |
| 39.0261 | 38.1667 | 37.0562 | 38.083 | |
| 39.3687 | 38.7957 | 39.0261 | 39.0635 | |
| 38.9113 | 38.0777 | 38.1667 | 38.385 | |
| 37.9841 | 37.8086 | 37.0562 | 37.6163 | |
| 39.3687 | 37.8086 | 38.1667 | 38.448 | |
| 38.9113 | 38.7957 | 37.0562 | 38.2544 | |
| 37.9841 | 38.0777 | 39.0261 | 38.3626 |