Literature DB >> 26377123

Teledermatology as a means to improve access to inpatient dermatology care.

Priyank Sharma1, Carrie L Kovarik2, Jules B Lipoff3.   

Abstract

Many hospitals have limited inpatient dermatology consultation access. Most dermatologists are outpatient-based and may find the distance and time to complete inpatient consultations prohibitive. Teledermatology may improve access to inpatient dermatology care by reducing barriers of distance and time. We conducted a prospective two-phase pilot study at two academic hospitals comparing time needed to complete inpatient consultations after resident dermatologists initially evaluated patients, called average handling time (AHT), and time needed to respond to the primary team, called time to response (TTR), with and without teledermatology with surveys to capture changes in dermatologist opinion on teledermatology. Teledermatology was only used in the study phase, and patients were seen in-person in both study phases. Teledermatology alone sufficiently answered consultations in 10 of 25 study consultations. The mean AHT in the study phase (sAHT) was 26.9 min compared to the baseline phase (bAHT) of 43.5 min, a 16.6 min reduction (p = 0.004). The 10 study cases where teledermatology alone was sufficient had mean study TTR (sTTR) of 273.3 min compared to a baseline TTR (bTTR) of 405.7 min, a 132.4 min reduction (p = 0.032). Teledermatology reduces the time required for an attending dermatologist to respond and the time required for a primary team to receive a response for an inpatient dermatology consultation in a subset of cases. These findings suggest teledermatology can be used as a tool to improve access to inpatient dermatology care.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Teledermatology; dermatology consultation; inpatient dermatology; remote consultation; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26377123     DOI: 10.1177/1357633X15603298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  7 in total

1.  Prospective Implementation of a Consultative Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Model at a Single Urban Academic Health System with Real Cost Data Subanalysis.

Authors:  Neha N Jariwala; Christopher K Snider; Shivan J Mehta; J Kyle Armstrong; Aaron Smith-McLallen; Junko Takeshita; Carrie L Kovarik; Jules B Lipoff
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Effect of Dermatology Consultation on Outcomes for Patients With Presumed Cellulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lauren N Ko; Anna C Garza-Mayers; Jessica St John; Lauren Strazzula; Priyanka Vedak; Radhika Shah; Allison S Dobry; Sowmya R Rao; Leslie W Milne; Blair Alden Parry; Daniela Kroshinsky
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 3.  Teledermatology Addressing Disparities in Health Care Access: a Review.

Authors:  Spandana Maddukuri; Jay Patel; Jules B Lipoff
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2021-03-12

4.  Recent trends in teledermatology and teledermoscopy.

Authors:  Katie J Lee; Anna Finnane; H Peter Soyer
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-07-31

5.  Expanding Teledermatology Educational Opportunities after COVID-19.

Authors:  Shahzeb Hassan; Mohannad G Safadi; Taha O Mohammed; Jules B Lipoff
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 6.  Inpatient Teledermatology: a Review.

Authors:  Joseph Mocharnuk; Trevor Lockard; Corey Georgesen; Joseph C English
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2022-04-02

7.  Access to Dermatological Care with an Innovative Online Model for Psoriasis Management: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Adam R Ford; Caitlin M Gibbons; Josefina Torres; Heather A Kornmehl; Sanminder Singh; Paulina M Young; Cindy J Chambers; Emanual Maverakis; Cory A Dunnick; April W Armstrong
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.536

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.