PURPOSE: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been proposed as a possible extra-articular stabiliser of the knee. Injury to the ALL may result in residual instability following surgical reconstruction of a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Few studies have evaluated the biomechanical role of the ALL. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sectioning the ALL would have an influence on tibiofemoral translation or rotation during the anterior drawer, Lachman, pivot shift, external rotation, and internal rotation tests in an ACL-deficient knee. METHODS: Only whole-body specimens having an ALL were included in this study. Lachman, anterior drawer, external rotation, and internal rotation tests were performed manually. Pivot shift test was done using a mechanised pivot shifter. The amount of tibiofemoral translation and rotation was recorded by a navigation system. Each specimen was tested in its native state, after sectioning the ACL, and after combined sectioning of the ACL and the ALL. RESULTS: In six out of 14 cadaveric knees, an ALL could be identified. The ACL-deficient knee had significantly more tibiofemoral translation and rotation compared to the native knee (P < 0.05). However, no changes in the magnitudes of translation or rotation were seen after subsequent sectioning of the ALL compared to the ACL-deficient knee (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Adding an ALL lesion in an ACL-deficient knee did not increase tibiofemoral instability in this cadaveric model. It remains unclear whether injury to the ALL would result in substantial knee instability in the setting of ACL injury in vivo. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the role of the ALL during knee kinematics and to determine in which scenarios ALL repair would be warranted. Understanding the function of the ALL may improve the current treatment strategies for ACL ruptures.
PURPOSE: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been proposed as a possible extra-articular stabiliser of the knee. Injury to the ALL may result in residual instability following surgical reconstruction of a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Few studies have evaluated the biomechanical role of the ALL. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sectioning the ALL would have an influence on tibiofemoral translation or rotation during the anterior drawer, Lachman, pivot shift, external rotation, and internal rotation tests in an ACL-deficient knee. METHODS: Only whole-body specimens having an ALL were included in this study. Lachman, anterior drawer, external rotation, and internal rotation tests were performed manually. Pivot shift test was done using a mechanised pivot shifter. The amount of tibiofemoral translation and rotation was recorded by a navigation system. Each specimen was tested in its native state, after sectioning the ACL, and after combined sectioning of the ACL and the ALL. RESULTS: In six out of 14 cadaveric knees, an ALL could be identified. The ACL-deficient knee had significantly more tibiofemoral translation and rotation compared to the native knee (P < 0.05). However, no changes in the magnitudes of translation or rotation were seen after subsequent sectioning of the ALL compared to the ACL-deficient knee (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Adding an ALL lesion in an ACL-deficient knee did not increase tibiofemoral instability in this cadaveric model. It remains unclear whether injury to the ALL would result in substantial knee instability in the setting of ACL injury in vivo. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the role of the ALL during knee kinematics and to determine in which scenarios ALL repair would be warranted. Understanding the function of the ALL may improve the current treatment strategies for ACL ruptures.
Authors: E Monaco; A Ferretti; L Labianca; B Maestri; A Speranza; M J Kelly; C D'Arrigo Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jack Porrino; Ezekiel Maloney; Michael Richardson; Hyojeong Mulcahy; Alice Ha; Felix S Chew Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: G M Strum; J M Fox; R D Ferkel; F H Dorey; W Del Pizzo; M J Friedman; S J Snyder; K Markolf Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1989-08 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Kevin G Shea; Matthew D Milewski; Peter C Cannamela; Theodore J Ganley; Peter D Fabricant; Elizabeth B Terhune; Alexandra C Styhl; Allen F Anderson; John D Polousky Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 4.176