Literature DB >> 26374748

Short fibre-reinforced composite for extensive direct restorations: a laboratory and computational assessment.

Bruno Castro Ferreira Barreto1,2, Annelies Van Ende1, Diogo Pedrollo Lise1, Pedro Yoshito Noritomi3, Siegfried Jaecques2, Jos Vander Sloten2, Jan De Munck1, Bart Van Meerbeek4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a short fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) applied in combination with a conventional filler composite (CFC) on the fatigue resistance, fracture strength, failure mode and stress distribution, for restorations of premolars under two loading angles.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two inferior premolars received extensive cavities with removal of the lingual cusp. Teeth were restored directly using 'FRC (EverX Posterior, GC) + CFC (G-aenial, GC)' or 'CFC only' and received two fatigue/fracture loadings at two different angles (0°/45°) (n = 8). Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA (α = 5 %) and Tukey test. Failure mode was analysed using SEM. Four 3D finite element (FE) models were constructed and static, linear and elastic analyses were performed. Maximum principal and von Mises stresses were evaluated.
RESULTS: All specimens survived the mechanical fatigue simulation. No statistical difference in fracture resistance was recorded between FRC + CFC and CFC only, considering both loading angles (p = 0.115). However, the 0° loading showed a statistical significant higher strength than the 45° loading (p = 0.000). Failure mode analysis revealed more repairable fractures upon 0° loading, versus more root fractures (unrepairable) upon 45° loading. FE revealed a higher amount of stress upon 45° loading, with tensile stress being imposed to the lingual cervical area.
CONCLUSION: The fracture strength was not increased using the FRC. Loading at a 45° decreased significantly the fracture resistance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The restoration of extensive cavities in posterior tooth is a challenge for the clinicians and the choice of the material that increases the fracture strength of tooth-restoration complex is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fatigue resistance; Finite element analysis; Fracture strength; Loading angle; Short fibre-reinforced composites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26374748     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1576-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  31 in total

1.  Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations: An in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Christian F J Stappert; Wael Att; Thomas Gerds; Joerg R Strub
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 2.  Resin composite--state of the art.

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Effect of nanofiller fractions and temperature on polymerization shrinkage on glass fiber reinforced filling material.

Authors:  Sufyan Garoushi; Pekka K Vallittu; David C Watts; Lippo V J Lassila
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Creep of experimental short fiber-reinforced composite resin.

Authors:  Sufyan Garoushi; Muhammad Kaleem; Akikazu Shinya; Pekka K Vallittu; Julian D Satterthwaite; David C Watts; Lippo V J Lassila
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars.

Authors:  P J Plasmans; L G Visseren; M M Vrijhoef; A F Kayser
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration.

Authors:  Antheunis Versluis; Daranee Tantbirojn; Maria R Pintado; Ralph DeLong; William H Douglas
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix.

Authors:  Sufyan Garoushi; Pekka K Vallittu; David C Watts; Lippo V J Lassila
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root-filled teeth restored with direct resin composite restorations under static and fatigue loading.

Authors:  N A Taha; J E Palamara; H H Messer
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.440

9.  Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.

Authors:  Paulo Vinicius Soares; Paulo Cesar Freitas Santos-Filho; Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins; Carlos Jose Soares
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Preliminary clinical evaluation of short fiber-reinforced composite resin in posterior teeth: 12-months report.

Authors:  S Garoushi; J Tanner; Pk Vallittu; L Lassila
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2012-01-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of ultimate force revealed by compression tests on extracted first premolars and FEA with a true scale 3D multi-component tooth model based on a CBCT dataset.

Authors:  Nuttapol Limjeerajarus; Phetcharat Dhammayannarangsi; Anon Phanijjiva; Pavita Tangsripongkul; Thanomsuk Jearanaiphaisarn; Pisha Pittayapat; Chalida Nakalekha Limjeerajarus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative evaluation of the effect of adhesive restorative composite resins on the reinforcement of peri-cervical dentin: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Indukuri Sai Lakshmi Durga; K Madhu Varma; Girija S Sajjan; R Kalyan Satish; Gadde Praveen
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-05-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.