Literature DB >> 17675144

Effect of nanofiller fractions and temperature on polymerization shrinkage on glass fiber reinforced filling material.

Sufyan Garoushi1, Pekka K Vallittu, David C Watts, Lippo V J Lassila.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the effect of different nanofiller fractions and temperature on polymerization shrinkage strain and degree of monomer conversion of short glass fibers reinforced semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN)-polymer matrix composite resin.
METHODS: Experimental composite resin was prepared by mixing 22.5 wt% of short E-glass fibers (3 mm in length) to the 22.5 wt% of resin matrix with various weight fractions of nanofillers (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 wt%) and then 55 wt% of silane treated silica filler were added gradually using high speed mixing machine. Another study group contained composite resin prepared by mixing 22.5 wt% of resin matrix (without nanofillers) to 77.5 wt% of filler particles (without fiber fillers). As control material, commercial particulate filler composite resin was used. The shrinkage strain of the specimens was measured using the bonded-disk technique at 26 and 37 degrees C with respect to time. Degree of conversion of the experimental composites containing different nanofiller fractions was measured using FTIR spectroscopy.
RESULTS: ANOVA revealed that fraction of nanofillers and polymerization temperature had significant effect (p<0.05) on the shrinkage strain and degree of conversion of the composite resin. Shrinkage strain correlated with nanofiller fraction and polymerization temperature (r2=0.96 and 0.95). SIGNIFICANCE: The use of high nanofiller fraction with short fiber fillers and IPN-polymer matrix yielded improved rate of shrinkage strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675144     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  6 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials.

Authors:  N B Cramer; J W Stansbury; C N Bowman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  System compliance dictates the effect of composite filler content on polymerization shrinkage stress.

Authors:  Zhengzhi Wang; Martin Y M Chiang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Short fibre-reinforced composite for extensive direct restorations: a laboratory and computational assessment.

Authors:  Bruno Castro Ferreira Barreto; Annelies Van Ende; Diogo Pedrollo Lise; Pedro Yoshito Noritomi; Siegfried Jaecques; Jos Vander Sloten; Jan De Munck; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Strong nanocomposites with Ca, PO(4), and F release for caries inhibition.

Authors:  H H K Xu; M D Weir; L Sun; J L Moreau; S Takagi; L C Chow; J M Antonucci
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 5.  An overview of development and status of fiber-reinforced composites as dental and medical biomaterials.

Authors:  Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2018-04-12

6.  The effect of silica nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composite resins.

Authors:  Mohammad Bagher Rezvani; Mohammad Atai; Faeze Hamze; Reihane Hajrezai
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2016-06-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.