BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common outcome after cardiac surgery. Delirium prediction rules identify patients at risk for delirium who may benefit from targeted prevention strategies, early identification, and treatment of underlying causes. The purpose of the present prospective study was to develop a prediction rule for delirium in a cardiac surgery cohort and to validate it in an independent cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospectively, cardiac surgery patients > or =60 years of age were enrolled in a derivation sample (n=122) and then a validation sample (n=109). Beginning on the second postoperative day, patients underwent a standardized daily delirium assessment, and delirium was diagnosed according to the confusion assessment method. Delirium occurred in 63 (52%) of the derivation cohort patients. Multivariable analysis identified 4 variables independently associated with delirium: prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, Mini Mental State Examination score, abnormal serum albumin, and the Geriatric Depression Scale. Points were assigned to each variable: Mini Mental State Examination < or =23 received 2 points, and Mini Mental State Examination score of 24 to 27 received 1 point; Geriatric Depression Scale >4, prior stroke/transient ischemic attack, and abnormal albumin received 1 point each. In the derivation sample, the cumulative incidence of delirium for point levels of 0, 1, 2, and > or =3 was 19%, 47%, 63%, and 86%, respectively (C statistic, 0.74). The corresponding incidence of delirium in the validation sample was 18%, 43%, 60%, and 87%, respectively (C statistic, 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Delirium occurs frequently after cardiac surgery. Using 4 preoperative characteristics, clinicians can determine cardiac surgery patients' risk for delirium. Patients at higher delirium risk could be candidates for close postoperative monitoring and interventions to prevent delirium.
BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common outcome after cardiac surgery. Delirium prediction rules identify patients at risk for delirium who may benefit from targeted prevention strategies, early identification, and treatment of underlying causes. The purpose of the present prospective study was to develop a prediction rule for delirium in a cardiac surgery cohort and to validate it in an independent cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospectively, cardiac surgery patients > or =60 years of age were enrolled in a derivation sample (n=122) and then a validation sample (n=109). Beginning on the second postoperative day, patients underwent a standardized daily delirium assessment, and delirium was diagnosed according to the confusion assessment method. Delirium occurred in 63 (52%) of the derivation cohort patients. Multivariable analysis identified 4 variables independently associated with delirium: prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, Mini Mental State Examination score, abnormal serum albumin, and the Geriatric Depression Scale. Points were assigned to each variable: Mini Mental State Examination < or =23 received 2 points, and Mini Mental State Examination score of 24 to 27 received 1 point; Geriatric Depression Scale >4, prior stroke/transient ischemic attack, and abnormal albumin received 1 point each. In the derivation sample, the cumulative incidence of delirium for point levels of 0, 1, 2, and > or =3 was 19%, 47%, 63%, and 86%, respectively (C statistic, 0.74). The corresponding incidence of delirium in the validation sample was 18%, 43%, 60%, and 87%, respectively (C statistic, 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Delirium occurs frequently after cardiac surgery. Using 4 preoperative characteristics, clinicians can determine cardiac surgery patients' risk for delirium. Patients at higher delirium risk could be candidates for close postoperative monitoring and interventions to prevent delirium.
Authors: Jakub Kazmierski; Maciej Kowman; Maciej Banach; Tomasz Pawelczyk; Piotr Okonski; Alicja Iwaszkiewicz; Janusz Zaslonka; Tomasz Sobow; Iwona Kloszewska Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: E R Marcantonio; L Goldman; C M Mangione; L E Ludwig; B Muraca; C M Haslauer; M C Donaldson; A D Whittemore; D J Sugarbaker; R Poss Journal: JAMA Date: 1994-01-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: S Jean Hsieh; Graciela J Soto; Aluko A Hope; Ana Ponea; Michelle N Gong Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-01-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Pei Chen; Sarah Dowal; Eva Schmitt; Daniel Habtemariam; Tammy T Hshieh; Ryan Victor; Kenneth S Boockvar; Sharon K Inouye Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jason B O'Neal; Frederic T Billings; Xulei Liu; Matthew S Shotwell; Yafen Liang; Ashish S Shah; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Jonathan P Wanderer; Andrew D Shaw Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Charles H Brown; Andrew LaFlam; Laura Max; Julie Wyrobek; Karin J Neufeld; Khaled M Kebaish; David B Cohen; Jeremy D Walston; Charles W Hogue; Lee H Riley Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mark A Oldham; Keith A Hawkins; I-Hsin Lin; Yanhong Deng; Qing Hao; Leslie M Scoutt; David D Yuh; Hochang B Lee Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2018-12-25 Impact factor: 4.105