Literature DB >> 26374095

Microsurgical Anatomy of the Terminal Hypoglossal Nerve Relevant for Neurostimulation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Bahar Bassiri Gharb1, Kashyap Komarraju Tadisina1, Antonio Rampazzo1, Ahmed M Hashem1, Huseyin Elbey1, Grzegorz J Kwiecien1, Gaby Doumit1, Richard L Drake2, Francis Papay1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neurostimulation of the hypoglossal nerve has shown promising results in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. This anatomic study describes the detailed topography of the hypoglossal nerve's motor points as a premise for super-selective neurostimulation in order to optimize results and minimize the risk of complications related to main nerve trunk manipulation.
METHODS: Thirty cadaveric hypoglossal nerves were dissected and characterized by number of branches, arborization pattern, and terminal branch motor point location. For each motor point, the distance to cervical midline (x axis), distance to posterior aspect of the symphysis (y axis), and depth from the plane formed by the inferior border of symphysis and anterior border of hyoid (z axis) were recorded.
RESULTS: The average number of distal branches for each hypoglossal nerve was found to be 9.95 ± 2.28. The average number of branches per muscle was found to be 3.3 ± 1.5 for the hyoglossus muscle, 1.8 ± 0.9 for the geniohyoid muscle, and 5.0 ± 1.6 for the genioglossus muscle. It was found that branches to the genioglossus and geniohyoid muscles were located closer to midline (relative lengths of 0.19 ± 0.07 and 0.19 ± 0.05, respectively) while hyoglossus branches were located more laterally (0.38 ± 0.10 relative length). On the y-axis, the branches to the genioglossus were the most anterior and therefore closest to the posterior symphysis of the mandible (relative length of 0.48 ± 0.11), followed by the geniohyoid (0.66 ± 0.09), and the hyoglossus (0.76 ± 0.16). The branches to the geniohyoid were the most superficial (relative length of 0.26 ± 0.06), followed by the genioglossus (0.36 ± 0.09), and finally, the hyoglossus branches (0.47 ± 0.11), which were located deeply.
CONCLUSION: A topographical map of the hypoglossal nerve terminal motor points was successfully created and could provide a framework for the optimization of the neurostimulation techniques.
© 2015 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrode placement; hypoglossal anatomy; hypoglossal nerve; microsurgical anatomy; neurostimulation; obstructive sleep apnea; upper airway stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26374095     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  5 in total

1.  Sonographic evaluation of tongue motions during upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea-a pilot study.

Authors:  Benedikt Hofauer; Kingman Strohl; Andreas Knopf; Murat Bas; Markus Wirth; Konrad Stock; Clemens Heiser
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  The specific branches leading to the genioglossus muscle: three-dimensional localisation using skin reference points.

Authors:  Bastien Benbassat; Clément Cambronne; Adeline Gallini; Patrick Chaynes; Frédéric Lauwers; Guillaume de Bonnecaze
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Ultrasound Localization and Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Hypoglossal Nerve and Ansa Cervicalis.

Authors:  David T Kent; Alan R Schwartz; David Zealear
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.591

4.  Implantation of the nyxoah bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulator for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Richard Lewis; Boris Pételle; Matthew C Campbell; Stuart MacKay; Carsten Palme; Guillaume Raux; J Ulrich Sommer; Joachim T Maurer
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-22

5.  Improving outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy: current practice, future directions, and research gaps. Proceedings of the 2019 International Sleep Surgery Society Research Forum.

Authors:  Maria V Suurna; Ofer Jacobowitz; Jolie Chang; Ioannis Koutsourelakis; David Smith; Uri Alkan; Mark D'Agostino; Maurits Boon; Clemens Heiser; Paul Hoff; Colin Huntley; David Kent; Alan Kominsky; Richard Lewis; Joachim T Maurer; Madeline J Ravesloot; Ryan Soose; Armin Steffen; Edward M Weaver; Amy M Williams; Tucker Woodson; Kathleen Yaremchuk; Stacey L Ishman
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.062

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.