Literature DB >> 26373604

Network dysfunction of emotional and cognitive processes in those at genetic risk of bipolar disorder.

Michael Breakspear1, Gloria Roberts2, Melissa J Green3, Vinh T Nguyen4, Andrew Frankland5, Florence Levy6, Rhoshel Lenroot7, Philip B Mitchell5.   

Abstract

The emotional and cognitive vulnerabilities that precede the development of bipolar disorder are poorly understood. The inferior frontal gyrus-a key cortical hub for the integration of cognitive and emotional processes-exhibits both structural and functional changes in bipolar disorder, and is also functionally impaired in unaffected first-degree relatives, showing diminished engagement during inhibition of threat-related emotional stimuli. We hypothesized that this functional impairment of the inferior frontal gyrus in those at genetic risk of bipolar disorder reflects the dysfunction of broader network dynamics underlying the coordination of emotion perception and cognitive control. To test this, we studied effective connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging data acquired from 41 first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder, 45 matched healthy controls and 55 participants with established bipolar disorder. Dynamic causal modelling was used to model the neuronal interaction between key regions associated with fear perception (the anterior cingulate), inhibition (the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) and the region upon which these influences converge, namely the inferior frontal gyrus. Network models that embodied non-linear, hierarchical relationships were the most strongly supported by data from our healthy control and bipolar participants. We observed a marked difference in the hierarchical influence of the anterior cingulate on the effective connectivity from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the inferior frontal gyrus that is unique to the at-risk cohort. Non-specific, non-hierarchical mechanisms appear to compensate for this network disturbance. We thus establish a specific network disturbance suggesting dysfunction in the processes that support hierarchical relationships between emotion and cognitive control in those at high genetic risk for bipolar disorder.
© The Author (2015). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bipolar disorder; cognitive control; computational psychiatry; imaging; neuropsychiatry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26373604     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  15 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity.

Authors:  Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Neuroimaging Markers of Risk, Disease Expression, and Resilience to Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Sophia Frangou
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Behavioral and Neural Sustained Attention Deficits in Bipolar Disorder and Familial Risk of Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  David Pagliaccio; Jillian Lee Wiggins; Nancy E Adleman; Elizabeth Harkins; Alexa Curhan; Kenneth E Towbin; Melissa A Brotman; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Elucidating neural network functional connectivity abnormalities in bipolar disorder: toward a harmonized methodological approach.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Mary L Phillips
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-05

5.  Abnormal intrinsic cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivity in un-medicated patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Yuan He; Ying Wang; Ting-Ting Chang; Yanbin Jia; Junjing Wang; Shuming Zhong; Huiyuan Huang; Yao Sun; Feng Deng; Xiaoyan Wu; Chen Niu; Li Huang; Guolin Ma; Ruiwang Huang
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Neural Markers in Pediatric Bipolar Disorder and Familial Risk for Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Jillian Lee Wiggins; Melissa A Brotman; Nancy E Adleman; Pilyoung Kim; Caroline G Wambach; Richard C Reynolds; Gang Chen; Kenneth Towbin; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 13.113

Review 7.  Neurobiology of Risk for Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Ayşegül Özerdem; Deniz Ceylan; Güneş Can
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2016-10-20

8.  Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression.

Authors:  Klaas E Stephan; Zina M Manjaly; Christoph D Mathys; Lilian A E Weber; Saee Paliwal; Tim Gard; Marc Tittgemeyer; Stephen M Fleming; Helene Haker; Anil K Seth; Frederike H Petzschner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Structural dysconnectivity of key cognitive and emotional hubs in young people at high genetic risk for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  G Roberts; A Perry; A Lord; A Frankland; V Leung; E Holmes-Preston; F Levy; R K Lenroot; P B Mitchell; M Breakspear
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  Aberrant brain network topology in the frontoparietal-limbic circuit in bipolar disorder: a graph-theory study.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Huiling Wu; Aiguo Zhang; Tongjian Bai; Gong-Jun Ji; Yanghua Tian; Kai Wang
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.