Literature DB >> 26371534

Kidney Transplantation: Multiparametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Renal Allograft Pathophysiology in Mice.

Katja Hueper1, Bennet Hensen, Marcel Gutberlet, Rongjun Chen, Dagmar Hartung, Amelie Barrmeyer, Martin Meier, Wang Li, Mi-Sun Jang, Michael Mengel, Frank Wacker, Song Rong, Faikah Gueler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this experimental study were to investigate renal allograft pathophysiology by multiparametric functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to directly correlate MRI parameters with renal histopathology in mouse models of allogenic and isogenic kidney transplantation (ktx).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Allograft rejection was induced by transplantation of C57BL/6 (B6) donor kidneys into BALB/c recipients (allogenic ktx). B6 mice that received B6 kidneys served as controls (isogenic ktx). Three weeks after ktx, MRI was performed using a 7-T small-animal scanner. Flow sensitive alternating inversion recovery echoplanar imaging arterial spin labeling, multiecho turbo spin echo, and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences were acquired. Maps of renal perfusion, T2 and T1 relaxation times, and apparent diffusion coefficients were calculated. Histological changes in the kidney were evaluated according to Banff criteria. Renal cell infiltrates and fibrosis were quantified by immunohistochemistry. Differences between groups were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the correlation of MRI parameters with renal histopathology was determined by Spearman correlation analysis.
RESULTS: After allogenic, but not isogenic, ktx, animals developed acute allograft rejection. Allogenic grafts were infiltrated by macrophages and T-lymphocytes and exhibited marked renal fibrosis. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed stronger impairment of renal perfusion (56 ± 7 vs 293 ± 44 mL/[min × 100 g]; P < 0.01) and more pronounced increases in T2 (60.1 ± 2.0 vs 45.7 ± 1.2 milliseconds, P < 0.01) and T1 relaxation times (1938 ± 53 vs 1350 ± 27 milliseconds, P < 0.01) in allogenic than in isogenic kidneys. Apparent diffusion coefficient was reduced to 1.39 ± 0.14 × 10(-3) mm2/s in kidneys with an acute rejection and was 1.83 ± 0.05 × 10(-3) mm2/s in isogenic kidneys without rejection (P < 0.05). Magnetic resonance imaging parameters significantly correlated with the amount of cellular infiltration and renal fibrosis observed histologically.
CONCLUSIONS: Functional MRI allows detection of acute renal allograft rejection after allogenic ktx in mice. Functional MRI parameters correlate with cell infiltrates and fibrosis. Thus, MRI may be used noninvasively and longitudinally to investigate mechanisms of renal allograft rejection and evaluate novel therapeutic strategies in experimental studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26371534     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  21 in total

1.  Assessment of acute kidney injury with T1 mapping MRI following solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Matti Peperhove; Van Dai Vo Chieu; Mi-Sun Jang; Marcel Gutberlet; Dagmar Hartung; Susanne Tewes; Gregor Warnecke; Christiane Fegbeutel; Axel Haverich; Wilfried Gwinner; Frank Lehner; Jan Hinrich Bräsen; Hermann Haller; Frank Wacker; Faikah Gueler; Katja Hueper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Kidneys-With and Without Gadolinium-Based Contrast.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.620

3.  Noninvasive measurement of renal blood flow by magnetic resonance imaging in rats.

Authors:  Cesar A Romero; Glauber Cabral; Robert A Knight; Guangliang Ding; Edward L Peterson; Oscar A Carretero
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2017-10-04

4.  Have we forgotten imaging prior to and after kidney transplantation?

Authors:  Stan Benjamens; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Stefan P Berger; Riemer H J A Slart; Robert A Pol
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Could MRI Be Used To Image Kidney Fibrosis? A Review of Recent Advances and Remaining Barriers.

Authors:  General Leung; Anish Kirpalani; Stephen G Szeto; Maya Deeb; Warren Foltz; Craig A Simmons; Darren A Yuen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Clinical application and technical considerations of T1 & T2(*) mapping in cardiac, liver, and renal imaging.

Authors:  Ilona A Dekkers; Hildo J Lamb
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Noninvasive assessment of renal fibrosis by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  Kai Jiang; Christopher M Ferguson; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 7.012

8.  New Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index for Renal Fibrosis Assessment: A Comparison between Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and T1 Mapping with Histological Validation.

Authors:  I Friedli; L A Crowe; L Berchtold; S Moll; K Hadaya; T de Perrot; C Vesin; P-Y Martin; S de Seigneux; J-P Vallée
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Multiparametric Functional MRI: A Tool to Uncover Subtle Changes following Allogeneic Renal Transplantation.

Authors:  Mike Notohamiprodjo; Aivars Kalnins; Martin Andrassy; Manuel Kolb; Benjamin Ehle; Susanna Mueller; Michael N Thomas; Jens Werner; Markus Guba; Konstantin Nikolaou; Joachim Andrassy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of thrombectomy and diffusion-weighted imaging with MRI in post-transplant renal vein thrombosis: a case report.

Authors:  Paraish Misra; Anish Kirpalani; General Leung; Paraskevi A Vlachou; Jason Y Lee; Serge Jothy; Jeffrey Zaltzman; Darren A Yuen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.