Literature DB >> 26369634

Validation of Ultrasound Elastography Imaging for Nondestructive Characterization of Stiffer Biomaterials.

Haoyan Zhou1, Monika Goss1, Christopher Hernandez1, Joseph M Mansour2, Agata Exner3.   

Abstract

Ultrasound elastography (UE) has been widely used as a "digital palpation" tool to characterize tissue mechanical properties in the clinic. UE benefits from the capability of noninvasively generating 2-D elasticity encoded maps. This spatial distribution of elasticity can be especially useful in the in vivo assessment of tissue engineering scaffolds and implantable drug delivery platforms. However, the detection limitations have not been fully characterized and thus its true potential has not been completely discovered. Characterization studies have focused primarily on the range of moduli corresponding to soft tissues, 20-600 kPa. However, polymeric biomaterials used in biomedical applications such as tissue scaffolds, stents, and implantable drug delivery devices can be much stiffer. In order to explore UE's potential to assess mechanical properties of biomaterials in a broader range of applications, this work investigated the detection limit of UE strain imaging beyond soft tissue range. To determine the detection limit, measurements using standard mechanical testing and UE on the same polydimethylsiloxane samples were compared and statistically evaluated. The broadest detection range found based on the current optimized setup is between 47 kPa and 4 MPa which exceeds the modulus of normal soft tissue suggesting the possibility of using this technique for stiffer materials' mechanical characterization. The detectable difference was found to be as low as 157 kPa depending on sample stiffness and experimental setup.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomaterial characterization; Elasticity; Mechanical; Nondestructive; Noninvasive; Ultrasound elastography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26369634      PMCID: PMC4791216          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1448-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  30 in total

Review 1.  Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; S K Alam; B Garra; F Kallel; E Konofagou; T Krouskop; T Varghese
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 2.  Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues.

Authors:  James F Greenleaf; Mostafa Fatemi; Michael Insana
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  Adhesion-contractile balance in myocyte differentiation.

Authors:  Maureen A Griffin; Shamik Sen; H Lee Sweeney; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Non-viral gene delivery regulated by stiffness of cell adhesion substrates.

Authors:  Hyun Joon Kong; Jodi Liu; Kathryn Riddle; Takuya Matsumoto; Kent Leach; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; I Céspedes; H Ponnekanti; Y Yazdi; X Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Effect of osteonectin-derived peptide on the viscoelasticity of hydrogel/apatite nanocomposite scaffolds.

Authors:  Alireza S Sarvestani; Xuezhong He; Esmaiel Jabbari
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 7.  Biomedical Imaging in Implantable Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Haoyan Zhou; Christopher Hernandez; Monika Goss; Anna Gawlik; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.465

8.  Viscoelastic properties of fibrinogen adsorbed to the surface of biomaterials used in blood-contacting medical devices.

Authors:  Norbert Weber; Aaron Pesnell; Durgadas Bolikal; Joan Zeltinger; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments.

Authors:  Adam J Engler; Maureen A Griffin; Shamik Sen; Carsten G Bönnemann; H Lee Sweeney; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.

Authors:  Hui Zhi; Bing Ou; Bao-Ming Luo; Xia Feng; Yan-Ling Wen; Hai-Yun Yang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  2 in total

1.  Physics-Informed Machine Learning Improves Detection of Head Impacts.

Authors:  Samuel J Raymond; Nicholas J Cecchi; Hossein Vahid Alizadeh; Ashlyn A Callan; Eli Rice; Yuzhe Liu; Zhou Zhou; Michael Zeineh; David B Camarillo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Quantitative Ultrasound for Nondestructive Characterization of Engineered Tissues and Biomaterials.

Authors:  Diane Dalecki; Karla P Mercado; Denise C Hocking
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.934

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.