| Literature DB >> 26368565 |
Magnus Gram1, Ulrik Dolberg Anderson2, Maria E Johansson1, Anneli Edström-Hägerwall1, Irene Larsson2, Maya Jälmby2, Stefan R Hansson2, Bo Åkerström1.
Abstract
Preeclampsia (PE) complicates 3-8% of all pregnancies and manifests clinically as hypertension and proteinuria in the second half of gestation. The pathogenesis of PE is not fully understood but recent studies have described the involvement of cell-free fetal hemoglobin (HbF). Hypothesizing that PE is associated with prolonged hemolysis we have studied the response of the cell-free Hb- and heme defense network. Thus, we have investigated the levels of cell-free HbF (both free, denoted HbF, and in complex with Hp, denoted Hp-HbF) as well as the major human endogenous Hb- and heme-scavenging systems: haptoglobin (Hp), hemopexin (Hpx), α1-microglobulin (A1M) and CD163 in plasma of PE women (n = 98) and women with normal pregnancies (n = 47) at term. A significant increase of the mean plasma HbF concentration was observed in women with PE. Plasma levels of Hp and Hpx were statistically significantly reduced, whereas the level of the extravascular heme- and radical scavenger A1M was significantly increased in plasma of women with PE. The Hpx levels significantly correlated with maternal blood pressure. Furthermore, HbF and the related scavenger proteins displayed a potential to be used as clinical biomarkers for more precise diagnosis of PE and are candidates as predictors of identifying pregnancies with increased risk of obstetrical complications. The results support that PE pathophysiology is associated with increased HbF-concentrations and an activation of the physiological Hb-heme defense systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26368565 PMCID: PMC4569570 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Description of pregnancies.
| Outcome | Normal pregnancy (Control; n = 47) | Preeclampsia (n = 98) | Early onset PE | Late onset PE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 (28–30) | 31 | 32 | 30 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.0 (23.7–26.3) | 26.1 | 27.1 | 25.9 |
| Parity (n) | 0.2 (0.02–0.32) | 0.5 | 0.82 | 0.37 |
| Systolic BP | 123 (120–126) | 161 | 176 | 157 |
| Diastolic BP | 77 (75–79) | 101 | 108 | 99 |
| Proteinuria (g/L) | 0.02 (0.00–0.04) | 2.32 | 3.35 | 2.08 |
| Gestational age at delivery (days) | 282 (279–285) | 256 | 212 | 269 |
| Twin pregnancies (n) | 0 | 8 (8%) | 2 (9%) | 6 (8%) |
| Gestational age at sampling (days) | 281 (278–284) | 253 | 208 | 266 |
| IVF (n) | 1 (2%) | 8 (8%) | 1 (5%) | 7 (10%) |
| ICSI (= n) | 1 (2%) | 1 (1%) | 1 (5%) | 0 |
| Egg donor recipient (n) | 0 | 1 (1%) | 0 | 1 (1%) |
| Medication to stimulate ovulation | 0 | 2 (2%) | 0 | 2 (3%) |
Patient demographics of PE cases and normal pregnancies (controls). Time of PE diagnosis was not known for 2 PE cases and therefore not included in the sub-classification of early and late onset PE. Values are shown as mean (95% confidence interval) or number (%). Statistical comparison vs. controls. p-value <0.05 is considered significant. NS: Not significant;
*:p = <0.05;
**:p = <0.001.
1 Early onset PE was defined as diagnosis before 34+0 weeks of gestation.
2 Late onset PE was defined as diagnosis before gestational week > 34+0.
3 Highest systolic blood pressure recorded within two weeks prior to delivery.
4 Highest diastolic blood pressure recorded within two weeks prior to delivery.
5 In one case not known, the other patient medicated with Pergotime.
Outcome of pregnancies.
| Outcome | Normal pregnancy (Control; n = 47) | Preeclampsia ( = 98) | Early onset PE | Late onset PE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth weight (gram) | 3602 (3477–3726) | 2834 | 1434 | 3213 |
| Fetal gender (M:F) | 23:24 | 46:49 | 7:15 | 37:34 |
| HELLP | 0 | 7 (7%) | 3 (14%) | 4 (5%) |
| Eclampsia | 0 | 5 (5%) | 2 (9%) | 3 (4%) |
| Induction (n) | 10 (21%) | 58 | 2 | 55 |
| Vaginal delivery (n) | 35 (75%) | 46 | 3 | 43 |
| Vacuum extraction (n) | 8 (17%) | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Cesarean section (n) | 12 (26%) | 47 | 18 | 27 |
| SGA | 0 | 1 (1%) | 0 | 1 (1%) |
| IUGR | 0 | 8 (8%) | 5 (23%) | 3 (4%) |
| Admitted to NICU | 2 (4%) | 32 | 14 | 18*** (25%) |
| Neonatal death | 0 | 1 (1%) | 1 (5%) | 0 |
| Preterm | 0 | 34 | 20 | 12 |
| APGAR10 | 9.80 (9.64–9.96) | 9.75 | 9.30 | 9.90 |
Patient demographics of PE cases and normal pregnancies (controls). Values are shown as mean (95% confidence interval) or number (%). Statistical comparison vs. controls. p-value <0.05 is considered significant. NS: Not significant;
*:p = <0.05;
**:p = <0.001.
1 Early onset PE was defined as diagnosis before 34+0 weeks of gestation.
2 Late onset PE was defined as diagnosis before gestational week > 34+0.
3 HELLP syndrome (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelets) diagnosed according to Mississippi classification.
4 Eclampsia was defined as seizures occurring during pregnancy and after delivery in the presence of PE.
5 SGA (Small for Gestational Age) defined as growth curve on Ultrasonography constant below curve.
5a Patient defined as both SGA and IUGR.
6 IUGR (Intra Uterine Growth Restriction) was defined as growth below -2 standard deviations (-22%) on Ultrasonography (equivalent to growth below 3rd percentile).
7 NICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit).
8 Preterm was defined as delivery before 36+6 weeks of gestation (258 days).
9 APGAR (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration) score at 10 minutes.
Biomarker results.
| Biomarker | Normal pregnancy (Control; n = 47) | Preeclampsia (n = 98) | Early onset PE | Late onset PE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HbF (ng/ml) | 3.85 (2.51–5.20) | 15.26 (7.0–23.6) | 18.72 (1.6–39.05) | 14.60 (5.10–24.0) |
| Hp-HbF (μg/ml) | 0.59 (0.003–1.18) | 0.61 (0.31–0.90) | 1.07 (-0.10–2.24) | 0.48 (0.29–0.66) |
| Total-Hb (μg/ml) | 277 (232–321) | 285 (238–331) | 290 (152–430) | 284 (237–331) |
| Hp (mg/ml) | 1.17 (1.04–1.30) | 0.97 (0.75–1.19) | 1.34 (0.39–2.30) | 0.89 (0.77–1.02) |
| CD 163 (μg/ml) | 461 (408–512) | 485 (445–527) | 433 (324–543) | 508 (465–551) |
| Hpx (mg/ml) | 0.93 (0.88–0.98) | 0.69 (0.66–0.73) | 0.69 (0.61–0.77) | 0.69 (0.65–0.73) |
| A1M (μg/ml) | 29.93 (27.89–31.97) | 33.50 (31.90–35.10) | 34.07 (30.31–37.83) | 33.70 (31.90–35.50) |
The mean concentrations of the biomarkers in the PE group and normal pregnancies (controls). Statistical comparison vs. controls. Significance was calculated with non-parametric statistics (Mann-Whitney). Values are mean values with (95% confidence interval). A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
1 Early onset PE was defined as diagnosis before 34+0 weeks of gestation.
2 Late onset PE was defined as diagnosis before gestational week > 34+0.
Fig 1Correlation between cell-free HbF- and Hp concentrations.
Samples were from normal pregnancies (Control) and women diagnosed with PE. The cell-free HbF plasma concentration of each patient sample (Control and PE) was plotted against the Hp plasma concentration (A). The cell-free HbF plasma concentration of Controls was plotted against the Hp plasma concentration (B). The cell-free HbF plasma concentration of women diagnosed with PE was plotted against the Hp plasma concentration (C). Associations between variables were assessed by linear regression analysis (Pearson’s).
Fig 2Correlation between Hp phenotype, cell-free HbF- and Hp-HbF concentration.
Hp-phenotypes (1–1, 1–2 or 2–2) were investigated in plasma using SDS-PAGE and Western blot with anti-Hp antibodies as shown in the three patient examples (A) as described in Materials and Methods and the distribution of the different isoforms are presented as mean percentage of women with Hp 1–1, 1–2 and 2–2 for respective group (B). The plasma concentration of cell-free HbF (C) and Hp-HbF (D) are shown separately in patient samples with each Hp phenotype (Hp 1–1, 1–2 and 2–2). Results are presented as mean percentage of respective Hp phenotype (Hp 1–1, 1–2 and 2–2) in B. Results are presented as mean ± SEM plasma concentration of cell-free HbF and Hp-HbF in C and D.
Fig 3Correlation between Hpx concentration and systolic/diastolic blood pressure.
Highest systolic (A) and diastolic (B) blood pressure (BP) measured within the last two weeks before delivery were plotted against the plasma concentration of Hpx. Correlation analysis of PE patients and controls using Pearson’s correlation coefficient between Hpx and blood pressure, systolic (A, solid line; r = -0.511, p-value<0.00001, n = 145) and diastolic (B, solid line; r = -0,520, p-value<0.00001, n = 145). Correlation analysis of PE patients only using Pearson’s correlation coefficient between Hpx and blood pressure, systolic (A, dashed line; r = -0,123, p-value 0.22, n = 98) and diastolic (B, dashed line; r = -0,058, p-value 0.57, n = 98).
Biomarker detection rates.
| False positive rate | HbF combined with A1M and Hpx | A1M combined with Hpx | Hpx |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5% | 69% | 66% | 64% |
| 10% | 69% | 67% | 70% |
| 20% | 81% | 81% | 75% |
| 30% | 83% | 85% | 79% |
| AUC | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
Detection rates at fixed positive values for the combination of 1) HbF, A1M and Hpx, 2) A1M and Hpx and 3) Hpx alone. Detection rates for PE at different false positive rates and AUC for the ROC curve. Calculations are for all PE vs. controls.
1 Based on logistic regression including all three parameters.
2 Based on logistic regression including both parameters.
Fig 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
ROC curves showing sensitivity and specificity for the combination of HbF, A1M and Hpx (A), Hpx and A1M (B) and Hpx (C). Area under curve (AUC) is 0.88 for the combination of HbF, A1M and Hpx, 0.92 for the combination of A1M and Hpx and 0.87 for Hpx.
Prediction of fetal and maternal outcomes.
| Admittance to NICU | Significance | AUC |
|---|---|---|
| HbF | 0.001 | 0.69 |
| Hp | 0.03 | 0.62 |
| Hpx | 0.008 | 0.66 |
|
| ||
| Hpx | 0.001 | 0.70 |
| CD 163 | 0.04 | 0.61 |
| Combination Hpx + CD 163 | 0.001 | 0.72 |
|
| ||
| Hpx | 0.009 | 0.62 |
Area Under the ROC-curves (AUC) for fetal outcomes (admittance to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and prematurity) and maternal outcomes (risk of cesarean section). The fetal outcome IUGR and the maternal outcomes induction of labor and vacuum extraction were not significantly related to any of the biomarkers. All calculations were based on univariable logistic regression analysis.
Fig 5Schematic representation of the tentative chain of events involving HbF, Hp, Hpx, A1M and ROS and leading to PE.
The figure shows a schematic placenta with impaired feto-maternal barrier function causing leakage of placenta factors. 1: Early events in the placenta induce an upregulation of the placenta HbF genes and protein and ROS. 2: Oxidative damage and leakage of the feto-maternal barrier results in 3: increased maternal plasma concentrations of HbF. Excess oxyHb undergoes auto-oxidation reactions resulting in free heme-groups and formation of ROS. 4: A complex network of scavenger proteins, composed of Hp, Hpx and A1M, binds, inhibits and eliminate HbF, heme and ROS. Cell-free HbF is bound by Hp and cleared by CD163 receptor-mediated uptake in monocytes and macrophage-cells. Free heme-groups are bound by Hpx and heme is cleared via the Hpx receptor CD91, preferably expressed on macrophages and hepatocytes. In this study, a highly significant decrease of both the Hp and Hpx was observed in maternal plasma of women with PE as compare to normal pregnancies. This indicated a prolonged presence of increased levels of both extracellular Hb and heme. Analysis of the plasma A1M levels in the present study displayed a significantly increase in women with PE as compared to normal pregnancies, most likely as a result of oxidative stress-induced up-regulation of the A1M gene expression.