| Literature DB >> 26367868 |
Nicole A Hynson1, Steven D Allison2, Kathleen K Treseder2.
Abstract
Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) enrichment can alter N dynamics associated with decomposing plant litter. However, it is unclear to what extent these alterations occur via microbial effects (e.g., changes in gene regulation, physiology, or community composition) versus plant litter effects (e.g., changes in composition of N and C compounds). To isolate microbial effects from plant litter effects, we collected plant litter from long-term N fertilized and control plots, reciprocally inoculated it with microbes from the two treatments, and incubated it in a common field setting for three months. We used quantum dots (QDs) to track fungal uptake of glycine and chitosan. Glycine is a relatively simple organic N compound; chitosan is more complex. We found that microbial and litter origins each contributed to a shift in fungal uptake capacities under N fertilization. Specifically, N fungi preferred glycine over chitosan, but control fungi did not. In comparison, litter effects were more subtle, and manifested as a three-way interaction between litter origin, microbial origin, and type of organic N (glycine versus chitosan). In particular, control fungi tended to target chitosan only when incubated with control litter, while N fungi targeted glycine regardless of litter type. Overall, microbial effects may mediate how N dynamics respond to anthropogenic N enrichment in ecosystems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26367868 PMCID: PMC4569051 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Configurations of QD-glycine (A) and QD-chitosan (B); and QD-chitosan in the interior of fungal hyphae from the N-fertilized community growing on N-fertilized litter (C), and control microbes on control litter (D).
A, B: Each organic N compound was conjugated to a green QD via a strong covalent bond between the amino group in the organic N compound and the carboxyl group embedded in the shell of the QD. C, D: We examined each sample in a confocal microscope, and performed three-dimensional scans to verify that the QDs (green) were located in the interior of the hyphae.
Fig 2Relative uptake capacity of QD-glycine and QD-chitosan.
Relative uptake capacity is QD uptake capacity of QD-compounds (as QDs μm3 d-1) divided by QD uptake capacity of QD-references. Microbes from control versus N-fertilized plots were added to control versus N-fertilized litter in microbial cages, in a reciprocal transplant design. All microbial cages were decomposed in control plots. Microbe origin, litter origin, and compound type interacted significantly to influence relative QD uptake (P = 0.003). Uptake values are relative to uptake rates of QD-references. Relative QD uptake > 1 (dashed line) indicates that fungi were targeting the organic N compound, rather than the QD or the carboxyl groups embedded in the QD surface. Symbols indicate significant (*) or marginally significant (†) uptake of QD-glycine or QD-chitosan relative to QD-references. Treatments with different letters are significantly different from one another (P < 0.05). Bars are means ±1SE of 5 replicates.
Relative uptake capacity of QD compounds by group.
| Group | Relative QD uptake |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Control litter | 1.16 ±0.12 (20) |
| N litter | 1.04 ±0.11 (20) |
|
| |
| Control microbes | 0.99 ±0.11 (20) a |
| N microbes | 1.21 ±0.11 (20) b |
|
| |
| QD-chitosan | 0.92 ±0.11 (20) a |
| QD-glycine | 1.28 ±0.10 (20) b |
|
| |
| Control microbes on control litter | 1.16 ±0.16 (10) ab |
| Control microbes on N litter | 0.82 ±0.14 (10) a |
| N microbes on control litter | 1.16 ±0.18 (10) ab |
| N microbes on N litter | 1.26 ±0.13 (10) b |
|
| |
| QD-chitosan by control litter | 1.07 ±0.17 (10) |
| QD-chitosan by N litter | 0.77 ±0.12 (10) |
| QD-glycine by control litter | 1.26 ±0.16 (10) |
| QD-glycine by N litter | 1.31 ±0.13 (10) |
|
| |
| QD-chitosan by control microbes | 1.00 ±0.20 (10) a |
| QD-chitosan by N microbes | 0.84 ±0.10 (10) a |
| QD-glycine by control microbes | 0.98 ±0.12 (10) a |
| QD-glycine by N microbes | 1.59 ±0.10 (10) b |
aQD uptake capacity (as QDs μm-3 d-1) compared to QD-references, as means ±1SE (n). Groups with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).