Literature DB >> 26366555

Mammalian pre-implantation chromosomal instability: species comparison, evolutionary considerations, and pathological correlations.

Lucia Carbone1,2,3,4, Shawn L Chavez5,6,7.   

Abstract

Pre-implantation embryo development in mammals begins at fertilization with the migration and fusion of the maternal and paternal pro-nuclei, followed by the degradation of inherited factors involved in germ cell specification and the activation of embryonic genes required for subsequent cell divisions, compaction, and blastulation. The majority of studies on early embryogenesis have been conducted in the mouse or non-mammalian species, often requiring extrapolation of the findings to human development. Given both conserved similarities and species-specific differences, however, even comparison between closely related mammalian species may be challenging as certain aspects, including susceptibility to chromosomal aberrations, varies considerably across mammals. Moreover, most human embryo studies are limited to patient samples obtained from in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics and donated for research, which are generally of poorer quality and produced with germ cells that may be sub-optimal. Recent technical advances in genetic, epigenetic, chromosomal, and time-lapse imaging analyses of high quality whole human embryos have greatly improved our understanding of early human embryogenesis, particularly at the single embryo and cell level. This review summarizes the major characteristics of mammalian pre-implantation development from a chromosomal perspective, in addition to discussing the technological achievements that have recently been developed to obtain this data. We also discuss potential translation to clinical applications in reproductive medicine and conclude by examining the broader implications of these findings for the evolution of mammalian species and cancer pathology in somatic cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; IVF; cancer; chromothripsis; embryo; evolution; fragmentation; micronuclei; preimplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26366555     DOI: 10.3109/19396368.2015.1073406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med        ISSN: 1939-6368            Impact factor:   3.061


  10 in total

Review 1.  Investigating somatic aneuploidy in the brain: why we need a new model.

Authors:  Jimi L Rosenkrantz; Lucia Carbone
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  Mosaicism in Preimplantation Human Embryos: When Chromosomal Abnormalities Are the Norm.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Advanced maternal age causes adverse programming of mouse blastocysts leading to altered growth and impaired cardiometabolic health in post-natal life.

Authors:  M A Velazquez; C G C Smith; N R Smyth; C Osmond; T P Fleming
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Early human embryos are naturally aneuploid-can that be corrected?

Authors:  Amy Lee; Ann A Kiessling
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Prediction of the Prognosis Based on Chromosomal Instability-Related DNA Methylation Patterns of ELOVL2 and UBAC2 in PTCs.

Authors:  Jun Han; Meijun Chen; Qingxiao Fang; Yanqing Zhang; Yihan Wang; Jamaspishvili Esma; Hong Qiao
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 8.886

6.  Nuclease Footprints in Sperm Project Past and Future Chromatin Regulatory Events.

Authors:  Graham D Johnson; Meritxell Jodar; Roger Pique-Regi; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential.

Authors:  Helen Bolton; Sarah J L Graham; Niels Van der Aa; Parveen Kumar; Koen Theunis; Elia Fernandez Gallardo; Thierry Voet; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Segmental aneuploidy in human blastocysts: a qualitative and quantitative overview.

Authors:  María-José Escribà; Xavier Vendrell; Vanessa Peinado
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  A Novel De Novo Chromosomal Insertion, 46 XX, ins(7:13)(p14; q14.2q21.1) is Related to the Embryo Development Arrest Following Assisted Reproductive Technique.

Authors:  Azam Azargoon; Nahid Azad
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Prospects of Germline Nuclear Transfer in Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve.

Authors:  Antonia Christodoulaki; Annekatrien Boel; Maoxing Tang; Chloë De Roo; Dominic Stoop; Björn Heindryckx
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.555

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.