| Literature DB >> 26366414 |
Jia Jia1, Xiaofeng Yang2, Zhiliang Wu2, Qian Zhang3, Zhi Lin1, Hongtao Guo1, Carol Sze Ki Lin2, Jianying Wang1, Yunshan Wang1.
Abstract
Lipase produced byEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26366414 PMCID: PMC4558457 DOI: 10.1155/2015/497462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
The composition of components and the experimental sequence for the single-factor experiment.
| Sequence | Nutrients | Components | Concentration (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Primary carbon sources | Glucose, maltose, sucrose, glycerol, hydrola | 15, 20, 25 |
|
| |||
| 2 | Secondary carbon sources | Corn starch, modified starch, dextrin | 8.5, 10, 11.5 |
|
| |||
| 3 | Nitrogen sources | Soybean meal, yeast extract, beef extract, peptone, sodium nitrateb | 35, 40, 45 |
|
| |||
| 4 | Oils | Olive oil, soybean oil, lard oil, peanut oil, sun-flower seed oil | 5, 10, 15 |
|
| |||
| 5 | Inorganic salts | NaH2PO4, K2SO4, CaCO3 | 0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 (for NaH2PO4) |
| 0, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25 (for K2SO4) | |||
| 0, 4, 5, 6 (for CaCO3) | |||
aCorn starch hydrolyzate (hydrol), a less expensive nutrient source for industrial medium, contains 50–60 g/L glucose and is rich in trace elements. The value of hydrol was 30, 40, and 50 g/L.
b40 g/L soybean meal was supplemented in the analysis of sodium nitrate. The concentration of sodium nitrate was set as 8, 10, and 12 g/L, respectively.
Coded levels and real values (in parentheses) for the BBD and lipase activity achieved after fermentation by A. niger G783.
| Run |
|
|
| Lipase activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 (10) | −1 (30) | 1 (15) | 1698 |
| 2 | 1 (12) | 0 (35) | −1 (5) | 1866 |
| 3 | 0 (10) | 0 (35) | 0 (10) | 2017 |
| 4 | 0 (10) | 0 (35) | 0 (10) | 2093 |
| 5 | −1 (8) | 0 (35) | −1 (5) | 1575 |
| 6 | 0 (10) | 0 (35) | 0 (10) | 2014 |
| 7 | 0 (10) | −1 (30) | −1 (5) | 1600 |
| 8 | 0 (10) | 0 (35) | 0 (10) | 2113 |
| 9 | 0 (10) | 0 (35) | 0 (10) | 2122 |
| 10 | 1 (12) | −1 (30) | 0 (10) | 1744 |
| 11 | 0 (10) | 1 (40) | 1 (15) | 1970 |
| 12 | −1 (8) | 0 (35) | 1 (15) | 1837 |
| 13 | −1 (8) | −1 (30) | 0 (10) | 1353 |
| 14 | 0 (10) | 1 (40) | −1 (5) | 1807 |
| 15 | −1 (8) | 1 (40) | 0 (10) | 1778 |
| 16 | 1 (12) | 1 (40) | 0 (10) | 1754 |
| 17 | 1 (12) | 0 (35) | 1 (15) | 1955 |
Figure 1The effect of primary carbon sources on lipase activity obtained by A. niger G783. The medium was modified based on FM1. The values are average of three independent experiments and the error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 2The effect of secondary carbon sources on lipase activity obtained by A. niger G783. The medium was modified based on FM1. The values are average of three independent experiments and the error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 3The effect of nitrogen source on lipase activity obtained by A. niger G783. The medium was modified based on FM1. For the study on the effect of NaNO3, 40 g/L soybean meal was supplemented in all runs. The values are average of three independent experiments and the error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 4The effect of the oil on lipase activity obtained by A. niger G783. The medium was modified based on FM1. The values are average of three independent experiments and the error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 5The effect of the inorganic salt on lipase activity obtained by A. niger G783. The medium was modified based on FM1. The values are average of three independent experiments and the error bars represent standard deviation.
ANOVA for lipase activity obtained by A. niger G783.a
| Source | Degrees of freedom | Sum of squares | Mean square |
| Prob. > | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 9 | 704679.1 | 78297.7 | 43.89 | <0.0001 | Significant |
|
| 1 | 75272.0 | 75272.0 | 42.20 | 0.0003 | |
|
| 1 | 104424.5 | 104424.5 | 58.54 | 0.0001 | |
|
| 1 | 46818.0 | 46818.0 | 26.24 | 0.0014 | |
|
| 1 | 43056.2 | 43056.2 | 24.14 | 0.0017 | |
|
| 1 | 7482.2 | 7482.2 | 4.19 | 0.0798 | |
|
| 1 | 1056.2 | 1056.2 | 0.59 | 0.4667 | |
|
| 1 | 148065.8 | 148065.8 | 83.01 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1 | 217012.0 | 217012.0 | 121.66 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1 | 24336.0 | 24336.0 | 13.64 | 0.0077 | |
| Residual | 7 | 12485.8 | 1783.7 | |||
| Lack of fit | 3 | 1475.0 | 491.7 | 0.18 | 0.9057 | Insignificant |
| Error | 4 | 11010.8 | 2752.7 | |||
| Total | 16 | 717164.9 |
aCoefficient of determination (R 2) = 0.9828, CV = 2.29%. A model with an F value of 43.89 implies that the model is significant, which could occur due to noise. Values of “Prob. > F” less than 0.01 indicate that model terms are significant. In this case, A, B, C, AB, A 2, B 2, and C 2 are significant model terms. The “Predicted R 2” of 0.9431 is close to the “Adj. R-Squared” of 0.9602, which corrects the R 2 values for the number of terms and for the sample size in the model. The “adequate precision” value of 22.523 indicates an adequate signal. The lack of fit is insignificant and the model is adequate. This model can be used to navigate the design space.
Figure 6Response surface plot showing the effect of each factor on lipase activity obtained by A. niger G783. The medium was modified based on FM2. The values are average of three independent experiments and the error bars represent standard deviation. (a) Corn starch with soybean meal; (b) corn starch with soybean oil; (c) soybean meal with soybean oil.
Validation experiments of the optimum medium (n = 9).
| Medium | Lipase activity (U/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batch 1 | Batch 2 | Batch 3 | Mean ± SD | CV (%) | |
| FM1 | 1863 ± 27 | 1835 ± 30 | 1896 ± 62 | 1865 ± 45 | 2.18 |
| FM2 | 2046 ± 34 | 1996 ± 63 | 2030 ± 59 | 2024 ± 52a | 2.27 |
| FM3 | 2174 ± 46 | 2161 ± 54 | 2177 ± 39 | 2171 ± 41b | 1.7 |
a,bLipase activity in FM2 and FM3 increased by 8.5% and 16.4%, respectively, compared to FM1.