| Literature DB >> 26365620 |
Ki Young Son1,2, Ho-Young Son3, Jeesoo Chae4, Jinha Hwang5, SeSong Jang6, Jae Moon Yun7,8, BeLong Cho9,10, Jin Ho Park11,12, Jong-Il Kim13,14,15,16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have been used extensively to identify genetic variants linked to metabolic syndrome (MetS), but most of them have been conducted in non-Asian populations. This study aimed to evaluate the association between MetS and previously studied single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and their interaction with health-related behavior in Korean men.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26365620 PMCID: PMC4568070 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-015-0111-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Characteristics of study subjects
| Characteristics | Case with MetS | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD or number (%) | Mean ± SD or number (%) | ||
| Total number | 254 | 939 | |
| Age (years) | 47.55 ± 6.56 | 47.92 ± 6.99 | 0.454 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.43 ± 2.49 | 23.72 ± 2.43 | <0.001 |
| MetS components | |||
| WC (cm) | 94. 23 ± 6.38 | 85.92 ± 6.88 | <0.001 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 44.09 ± 11.60 | 52.29 ± 11.49 | <0.001 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 209. 16 ± 90.55 | 107.31 ± 57.42 | <0.001 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 105.87 ± 22.08 | 90.60 ± 12.99 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 131.22 ± 13.08 | 120.95 ± 13.55 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 83.90 ± 10.38 | 76.50 ± 9.85 | <0.001 |
| Health-related behaviors | |||
| Smoking | 0.017 | ||
| Non smoker | 46 (18.1 %) | 217 (23.1 %) | |
| Former smoker | 92 (36.2 %) | 367 (39.1 %) | |
| Current smoker | 116 (45.7 %) | 355 (37.8 %) | |
| Drinking | 0.002 | ||
| Non drinker | 39 (15.4 %) | 176 (18.7 %) | |
| Light drinker | 85 (33.5 %) | 373 (39.7 %) | |
| Moderate drinker | 40 (15.7 %) | 157 (16.7 %) | |
| Heavy drinker | 90 (35.4 %) | 233 (24.8 %) | |
| Physical activity category | 0.295 | ||
| Low level | 109 (44.9 %) | 379 (41.3 %) | |
| Moderate level | 87 (35.8 %) | 341 (37.1 %) | |
| High level | 47 (19.3 %) | 198 (21.6 %) | |
P-value represents the significance of the difference between case with MetS and control. All continuous variables were compared using t test. Health-related behaviors were assessed according to the linear-by-linear association of chi-square test
BMI body mass index, MetS Metabolic syndrome, WC waist circumference, HDL high density lipoprotein, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, SD standard deviation
The logistic regression results of significant SNPs for MetS and its components
| Gene | SNP | Chr | Model | Phenotype (number of case / control) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WC (460 / 733) | TG (348 / 845) | HDL (198 / 995) | BP (451 / 742) | Glucose (304 / 889) | MetS (254 / 939) | ||||||||||
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) |
| ||||
|
| rs662799 | 11 | Model 1a | 0.971 (0.80–1.17) | 0.7550 |
|
|
|
| 1.033 (0.85–1.25) | 0.7379 | 1.042 (0.84–1.29) | 0.7019 |
|
|
| Model 2b | 1.009 (0.83–1.22) | 0.9247 |
|
|
|
| 1.016 (0.84–1.23) | 0.8766 | 1.100 (0.88–1.37) | 0.3927 |
|
| |||
|
| rs769450 | 19 | Model 1a | 0.894 (0.72–1.11) | 0.3091 |
|
| 1.072 (0.81–1.41) | 0.6235 | 0.869 (0.70–1.08) | 0.2080 | 0.994 (0.78–1.26) | 0.9630 | 0.759 (0.58–0.99) | 0.0427 |
| Model 2b | 0.893 (0.72–1.11) | 0.3130 |
|
| 1.016 (0.76–1.36) | 0.9152 | 0.896 (0.72–1.12) | 0.3316 | 0.979 (0.77–1.25) | 0.8714 | 0.757 (0.58–0.99) | 0.0448 | |||
MetS components cut-off: WC >90 Cm for men, TG > 150 mg/dL, HDL < 40 mg/dL, BP: SBP > 130 mmHg or DBP > 85 mmHg, Glucose > 100 mg/dL
Bold indicates significance of Bonfferoni adjusted P-value (<0.0029)
WC waist circumference, TG triglyceride, HDL high density lipoprotein, BP blood pressure, MetS Metabolic syndrome
aModel 1: Adjusted for age and region of recruitment
bModel 2: Further adjusted for smoking, alcohol and physical activity
Fig. 1The additive effect of rs662799 and rs769450. TG, HDL level and MetS prevalence according to the (a) rs662799 and (b) rs769450 genotypes. The P-values of TG and HDL were estimated via linear regression analysis and MetS prevalence was estimated via logistic regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for age and region of recruitment (Model1). HDL: high density lipoprotein, TG: triglyceride
Fig. 2Significant SNPs and their interaction with health-related behaviors. TG levels in participants with (a) rs662799 and (b) rs769450 genotypes associated with stratified levels of smoking, drinking and physical activity. Asterisks indicate the significance of the differences in TG levels between each genotype (t-test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001). All error bars represent standard errors. Stratified drinking cutoff levels, alcohol (g)/week: nondrinker = 0; light drinker <98 g; moderate drinker >98 g but <196 g; and heavy drinker ≥196 g. PA: physical activity, TG: triglyceride