Literature DB >> 26364905

Bronchiolitis of Infancy Discharge Study (BIDS): a multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind, randomised controlled, equivalence trial with economic evaluation.

Steve Cunningham1, Aryelly Rodriguez2, Kathleen A Boyd3, Emma McIntosh3, Steff C Lewis4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no randomised trials of peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) targets in acute respiratory infection. Two national guidelines recommended different targets for the management of acute viral bronchiolitis.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline target of SpO2 ≥ 90% with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network target of SpO2 ≥ 94%.
DESIGN: A multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind, randomised controlled, equivalence trial with economic evaluation.
SETTING: Eight paediatric hospital departments in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Infants > 6 weeks and ≤ 12 months of age (corrected for prematurity) with physician-diagnosed bronchiolitis admitted to hospital from a paediatric emergency assessment area. Follow-up for 6 months by standardised telephone contacts. INTERVENTION: Infants were randomised to a target oxygen saturation of ≥ 94% (standard care) or ≥ 90% (modified care) displayed by a pulse saturation oximeter (Masimo Corporation Limited, CA, USA). ROUTINE CARE: All infants received routine care in addition to the study intervention. Infants were eligible for discharge when they exhibited a SpO2 of ≥ 94% in room air for 4 hours including a period of sleep and were also feeding adequately (≥ 75% usual volume). PRIMARY OUTCOME: A total of 615 infants were recruited, of whom 308 were allocated to the standard care group and 307 to the modified care group. The primary outcome was time to cough resolution. There was equivalence at the prespecified variance of ± 2 days [time to cough resolution: standard care group, 15 days; modified care group, 15 days; median difference 1 day (benefit modified), 95% confidence interval (CI) -1 to 2 days]. SECONDARY
RESULTS: Return to adequate feeding occurred sooner in infants in the modified care group than in those in the standard care group (19.5 vs. 24.1 hours). This difference was non-equivalent [median difference 2.7 hours (95% CI -0.3 to 7.0 hours) versus prespecified ± 4 hours; post-hoc hazard ratio 1.22 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.44 (p-value = 0.015)]. Parent perspective of the time taken to return to normal was not equivalent, being 12 days in the standard care group compared with 11 days in the modified care group [median difference 1.0 day (95% CI 0.0 to 3.0 days) versus prespecified ± 2 days; post-hoc hazard ratio 1.19 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.41); p-value = 0.043]. At 28 days, SpO2 was equivalent [mean difference 0.11% (95% CI -0.35% to 0.57%), within the 1% prespecified]. The modified care group (55.6%) required oxygen less than the standard care group (73.1%), and for a shorter period (5.7 hours vs. 27.6 hours). Infants in the modified care group were fit for discharge (30.2 hours vs. 44.2 hours, hazard ratio 1.46, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.73; p-value < 0.001) and were discharged (40.9 hours vs. 50.9 hours; hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.50; p-value < 0.003) sooner than those in the standard care group. There were 35 serious adverse events in the standard care group, compared with 25 in the modified care group. Eight infants in the standard care group and 12 in the modified care group were admitted to a high-dependency unit. By 28 days, 23 infants had been readmitted to hospital in the standard care group and 12 infants in the modified care group. Parents of infants in the modified care group did not experience higher levels of anxiety and, by 14 days, had lost 28% fewer hours to usual activities. NHS costs were £290 lower in the modified care group than in the standard care group, with additional societal costs also being lower in the modified care group.
CONCLUSIONS: Management of infants to a SpO2 target of ≥ 90% is as clinically effective as ≥ 94%, gives rise to no additional safety concerns, and appears to be cost-effective. Future work could focus on the safety and effectiveness of using intermittent oxygen saturation monitoring in secondary care, and to consider what are safe and effective oxygen saturation targets for children with bronchiolitis managed in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered as ISRCTN28405428. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme. Masimo Corporation Limited, CA, USA, kindly provided oxygen saturation monitors with standard and altered algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26364905      PMCID: PMC4780975          DOI: 10.3310/hta19710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  14 in total

Review 1.  Cardiorespiratory and Pulse Oximetry Monitoring in Hospitalized Children: A Delphi Process.

Authors:  Amanda C Schondelmeyer; Maya L Dewan; Patrick W Brady; Kristen M Timmons; Rhonda Cable; Maria T Britto; Christopher P Bonafide
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Prevalence of Continuous Pulse Oximetry Monitoring in Hospitalized Children With Bronchiolitis Not Requiring Supplemental Oxygen.

Authors:  Christopher P Bonafide; Rui Xiao; Patrick W Brady; Christopher P Landrigan; Canita Brent; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Amanda P Bettencourt; Lisa McLeod; Frances Barg; Rinad S Beidas; Amanda Schondelmeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The Alarm Burden of Excess Continuous Pulse Oximetry Monitoring Among Patients With Bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Irit R Rasooly; Spandana Makeneni; Amina N Khan; Brooke Luo; Naveen Muthu; Christopher P Bonafide
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  EHR-Integrated Monitor Data to Measure Pulse Oximetry Use in Bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Andrew S Kern-Goldberger; Irit R Rasooly; Brooke Luo; Sansanee Craig; Daria F Ferro; Halley Ruppel; Padmavathy Parthasarathy; Nathaniel Sergay; Courtney M Solomon; Kate E Lucey; Naveen Muthu; Christopher P Bonafide
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2021-10

5.  Association Between Bronchiolitis Patient Volume and Continuous Pulse Oximetry Monitoring in 25 Hospitals.

Authors:  Patricia A Stoeck; Deanna F Chieco; Elizabeth W Pingree; Christopher P Landrigan
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 6.  Hemoglobin oxygen saturation targets in the neonatal intensive care unit: Is there a light at the end of the tunnel? 1.

Authors:  Payam Vali; Mark Underwood; Satyan Lakshminrusimha
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Hospitalizations in Canada.

Authors:  Ian Mitchell; Isabelle Defoy; ElizaBeth Grubb
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.409

8.  Data sharing in clinical trials - practical guidance on anonymising trial datasets.

Authors:  Catriona Keerie; Christopher Tuck; Garry Milne; Sandra Eldridge; Neil Wright; Steff C Lewis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Safely Discharging Infants with Bronchiolitis from an Emergency Department: A Five Step Guide for Pediatricians.

Authors:  Fabiola Stollar; Alain Gervaix; Constance Barazzone Argiroffo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Protocol for a randomised pilot multiple centre trial of conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets in critically ill children (Oxy-PICU).

Authors:  Gareth A L Jones; Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Sainath Raman; David Inwald; Michael P W Grocott; Simon Eaton; Samiran Ray; Michael J Griksaitis; John Pappachan; Daisy Wiley; Paul R Mouncey; Jerome Wulff; David A Harrison; Kathryn M Rowan; Mark J Peters
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.