Lena Thomas1, Constatin Lapa2, Ralph Alexander Bundschuh3, Bülent Polat4, Jan-Jakob Sonke5, Matthias Guckenberger6. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: Lena.Thomas@ukb.uni-bonn.de. 2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Germany. 3. Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Germany. 4. Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Germany. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 6. Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Germany; Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective was to analyse the value of F-18-fluorodesoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for delineation of the Gross Tumour Volumes (GTVs) in primary radiotherapy of oesophageal cancer. METHOD: 20 consecutive and prospective patients (13 men, 7 women) underwent FDG-PET/CT for initial staging and radiation treatment planning. After endoscopy-guided clipping of the tumour another CT study was acquired. The CT and the FDG-PET/CT were registered with a rigid and a non-rigid registration algorithm to compare the overlap between GTV contours defined with the following methods: manual GTV definition in (1) the CT image of the FDG-PET/CT, (2) the PET image of the FDG-PET/CT, (3) the CT study based on endoscopic clips (CT clip), and (4) in the PET-data using different semi-automatic PET segmentation algorithms including a gradient-based algorithm. The absolute tumour volumes, tumour length in cranio-caudal direction, as well as the overlap with the reference volume (CT-clip) were compared for all lesions and separately for proximal/distal tumours. RESULTS: In 6 of the patients, FDG-PET/CT discovered previously unknown tumour locations, which resulted in either altered target volumes (n=3) or altered intent of treatment from curative to palliative (n=3) by upstaging to stage IV. For tumour segmentation a large variability between all algorithms was found. For the absolute tumour volumes with CT-clip as reference, no single PET-based segmentation algorithm performed better compared to using the manual CT delineation alone. The best correlation was found between the CT-clip and the gradient based segmentation algorithm (PET-edge, R(2)=0.84) as well as the manual CT-delineation (CT-manual R(2)=0.89). Non-rigid registration between CT and image FDG-PET/CT did not decrease variability between segmentation methods compared to rigid registration statistically significant. For the analysis of tumour length no homogeneous correlation was found. CONCLUSION: Whereas FDG-PET was highly relevant for staging purposes, CT imaging with clipping of the tumour extension remains the gold standard for GTV delineation.
PURPOSE: The objective was to analyse the value of F-18-fluorodesoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for delineation of the Gross Tumour Volumes (GTVs) in primary radiotherapy of oesophageal cancer. METHOD: 20 consecutive and prospective patients (13 men, 7 women) underwent FDG-PET/CT for initial staging and radiation treatment planning. After endoscopy-guided clipping of the tumour another CT study was acquired. The CT and the FDG-PET/CT were registered with a rigid and a non-rigid registration algorithm to compare the overlap between GTV contours defined with the following methods: manual GTV definition in (1) the CT image of the FDG-PET/CT, (2) the PET image of the FDG-PET/CT, (3) the CT study based on endoscopic clips (CT clip), and (4) in the PET-data using different semi-automatic PET segmentation algorithms including a gradient-based algorithm. The absolute tumour volumes, tumour length in cranio-caudal direction, as well as the overlap with the reference volume (CT-clip) were compared for all lesions and separately for proximal/distal tumours. RESULTS: In 6 of the patients, FDG-PET/CT discovered previously unknown tumour locations, which resulted in either altered target volumes (n=3) or altered intent of treatment from curative to palliative (n=3) by upstaging to stage IV. For tumour segmentation a large variability between all algorithms was found. For the absolute tumour volumes with CT-clip as reference, no single PET-based segmentation algorithm performed better compared to using the manual CT delineation alone. The best correlation was found between the CT-clip and the gradient based segmentation algorithm (PET-edge, R(2)=0.84) as well as the manual CT-delineation (CT-manual R(2)=0.89). Non-rigid registration between CT and image FDG-PET/CT did not decrease variability between segmentation methods compared to rigid registration statistically significant. For the analysis of tumour length no homogeneous correlation was found. CONCLUSION: Whereas FDG-PET was highly relevant for staging purposes, CT imaging with clipping of the tumour extension remains the gold standard for GTV delineation.
Authors: M E Nowee; F E M Voncken; A N T J Kotte; L Goense; P S N van Rossum; A L H M W van Lier; S W Heijmink; B M P Aleman; J Nijkamp; G J Meijer; I M Lips Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-10-26
Authors: Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 3.621