Literature DB >> 26364869

A custom-made mandibular repositioning device for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome: the ORCADES study.

Marie-Françoise Vecchierini1, Valérie Attali2, Jean-Marc Collet3, Marie-Pia d'Ortho4, Pierre El Chater5, Jean-Baptiste Kerbrat6, Damien Leger7, Christelle Monaca8, Pierre-Jean Monteyrol9, Laurent Morin10, Eric Mullens11, Bernard Pigearias12, Jean-Claude Meurice13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mandibular repositioning devices (MRDs) are usually recommended as the first therapy option in patients with mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, data on the long-term efficacy of MRDs are limited, not only in OSA patients who are noncompliant with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) but also in those with more severe OSA. The ORCADES study aimed to prospectively determine the long-term efficacy and tolerability of two custom-made Narval(™) MRDs for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) patients. The interim 3- to 6-month data are reported.
METHODS: Eligible patients had OSAHS and had refused or were noncompliant with prescribed CPAP. Outcome measurements after gradual mandibular advancement titration included: apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), oxygen saturation, sleepiness, symptoms, quality of life, side effects and compliance.
RESULTS: A total of 369 patients were included. Overall, MRD treatment was successful (≥50% decrease in AHI) in 76.2% of the participants; complete response (AHI <10/h) was achieved in 63.5%. Severe OSAHS was effectively treated (AHI <15/h) in about 60% of the participants; 38% had complete symptom resolution. Mandibular repositioning devices significantly decreased subjective sleepiness, eliminated symptoms and improved quality of life. They were well tolerated and compliance was excellent. Only 8% of the participants stopped MRD treatment due to side effects.
CONCLUSION: Custom-made Narval(™) MRDs are effective for mild to severe OSA in patients who refuse or are noncompliant with CPAP. They are well tolerated and have excellent compliance.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compliance; Mandibular repositioning device; Obstructive sleep apnoea; Tolerance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26364869     DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep Med        ISSN: 1389-9457            Impact factor:   3.492


  13 in total

1.  A Feedback-Controlled Mandibular Positioner Identifies Individuals With Sleep Apnea Who Will Respond to Oral Appliance Therapy.

Authors:  John E Remmers; Zbigniew Topor; Joshua Grosse; Nikola Vranjes; Erin V Mosca; Rollin Brant; Sabina Bruehlmann; Shouresh Charkhandeh; Seyed Abdolali Zareian Jahromi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Preface for the 3rd Clinical Update Sleep, 23rd February 2018, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK: year in review.

Authors:  Culadeeban Ratneswaran; Manpreet K Sagoo; Joerg Steier
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Treatments for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Michael W Calik
Journal:  J Clin Outcomes Manag       Date:  2016-04

4.  Factors influencing adherence to oral appliance therapy in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harishri Tallamraju; J Tim Newton; Padhraig S Fleming; Ama Johal
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.324

5.  Upper airway stabilization by osteopathic manipulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion versus sham manipulation in OSAS patients: a proof-of-concept, randomized, crossover, double-blind, controlled study.

Authors:  Olivier Jacq; Isabelle Arnulf; Thomas Similowski; Valérie Attali
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.659

6.  Obstructive sleep apnea treated with custom-made bibloc and monobloc oral appliances: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Göran Isacsson; Clara Fodor; Magnus Sturebrand
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Efficiency of the Ocluch©MAD in the treatment of patients with OSAS and its association with craniofacial morphology.

Authors:  Nilda Becerra; Mónica Firmani; Emilia Valencia; Lissette Cazenave; Claudio Sotomayor; Paula Espinosa; Juan Carlos Salinas; Diana Florea
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

8.  Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maurits H T de Ruiter; Linda B L Benoist; Nico de Vries; Jan de Lange
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Mandibular advancement device use in obstructive sleep apnea: ORCADES study 5-year follow-up data.

Authors:  Marie-Françoise Vecchierini; Valérie Attali; Jean-Marc Collet; Marie-Pia d'Ortho; Frederic Goutorbe; Jean-Baptiste Kerbrat; Damien Leger; Florent Lavergne; Christelle Monaca; Pierre-Jean Monteyrol; Eric Mullens; Bernard Pigearias; Francis Martin; Hauria Khemliche; Lionel Lerousseau; Jean-Claude Meurice
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.324

10.  Use of bibloc and monobloc oral appliances in obstructive sleep apnoea: a multicentre, randomized, blinded, parallel-group equivalence trial.

Authors:  Göran Isacsson; Eva Nohlert; Anette M C Fransson; Anna Bornefalk-Hermansson; Eva Wiman Eriksson; Eva Ortlieb; Livia Trepp; Anna Avdelius; Magnus Sturebrand; Clara Fodor; Thomas List; Mohamad Schumann; Åke Tegelberg
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.