Literature DB >> 26363560

The influence of adjacent level disc disease on discectomy outcomes.

Michael R Briseño1,2, Rishabh D Phukan1, Dana A Leonard3, Tyler L Herzog1, Charles H Cho2, Joseph H Schwab1, Kirkham B Wood1, Christopher M Bono2, Thomas D Cha1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The state of adjacent level discs and its impact on surgical outcomes following single-level lumbar discectomy have not been previously investigated. The purpose of the present study was to determine if a significant relationship exists between the degree of preoperative adjacent level disc degeneration and post-operative clinical outcomes following lumbar discectomy.
METHODS: This study retrospectively used preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prospectively collected data from a randomized clinical trial at two tertiary-care academic hospitals. Patients who underwent a primary, single-level lumbar discectomy were included. Exclusion criteria included prior lumbar surgery. Outcome measures were the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain. These were recorded at baseline and at 3 months, 1, and 2 years postoperatively. An independent reviewer graded adjacent level disc degeneration on all preoperative MRIs using the Pfirrmann grading scale. These data were then analyzed for correlation with each outcome measure.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included in the study. No statistically significant correlations were found when comparing preoperative 3-month or 1-year postoperative scores or change from baseline of any outcome measure between Pfirrmann grades. Only about half the patients had 2-year follow-up, but at that time point a statistically significant difference in back VAS scores was observed between Pfirrmann groups. No other significant differences were observed at that point.
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of preoperative adjacent level degeneration does not significantly affect functional or pain relief outcomes following lumbar discectomy up to 1 year after surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent level disease; Discectomy; Lumbar spine; Outcomes; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26363560     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4200-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years.

Authors:  E Yorimitsu; K Chiba; Y Toyama; K Hirabayashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Jonathan S Skinner; Brett Hanscom; Anna N A Tosteson; Harry Herkowitz; Jeffrey Fischgrund; Frank P Cammisa; Todd Albert; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  Elliot Carlisle; Mario Luna; Paul M Tsou; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Robert B Keller; Yen A Wu; Richard A Deyo; Daniel E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  C W Pfirrmann; A Metzdorf; M Zanetti; J Hodler; N Boos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial.

Authors:  Jeremy Fairbank; Helen Frost; James Wilson-MacDonald; Ly-Mee Yu; Karen Barker; Rory Collins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-23

7.  Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration.

Authors:  Jens Ivar Brox; Roger Sørensen; Astrid Friis; Øystein Nygaard; Aage Indahl; Anne Keller; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Hege R Eriksen; Inger Holm; Anne Kathrine Koller; Rolf Riise; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Michael Y Han; Patrick W Suen; David Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Low-back pain following surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A prospective study.

Authors:  Tomoaki Toyone; Tadashi Tanaka; Daisuke Kato; Ryutaku Kaneyama
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.

Authors:  Christopher B Dewing; Matthew T Provencher; Robert H Riffenburgh; Stewart Kerr; Richard E Manos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2016.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  MRI findings in lumbar spine following O2-O3 chemiodiscolysis: A long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Federico Bruno; Fernando Smaldone; Marco Varrassi; Francesco Arrigoni; Antonio Barile; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi; Alessandra Splendiani
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Association between MRI findings and clinical outcomes in a period of 5 years after lumbar spine microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Evangelos I Papanastasiou; Daphne J Theodorou; Stavroula J Theodorou; Emilios E Pakos; Avraam Ploumis; Anastasios V Korompilias; Ioannis D Gelalis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-02

4.  Clinical effects of transforaminal and interlaminar percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Xijia Jiang; Xindie Zhou; Nanwei Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.