Literature DB >> 26363536

Confidentiality & the Risk of Genetic Discrimination: What Surgeons Need to Know.

Amanda Gammon1, Deborah W Neklason2.   

Abstract

In the past decade, laws have been passed to provide legal protections against genetic discrimination. Many members of the public and medical providers are unaware of the legislation, and concerns about genetic privacy can prevent delivery of optimal medical care. Patient health information, including genetic testing and family history, is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. Additional protections are granted through the Americans with Disabilities Act, state laws, and the Affordable Care Act. Communicating a genetic test result back to a patient is important for medical management decisions and family members.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; Genetic discrimination; Genetic testing; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; Hereditary cancer; Legal; Privacy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26363536      PMCID: PMC4568442          DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am        ISSN: 1055-3207            Impact factor:   3.495


  31 in total

1.  Executive Order 13145 of February 8, 2000: to prohibit discrimination in federal employment based on genetic information.

Authors:  William J Clinton
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2000-02-10

2.  Keeping pace with the times--the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008.

Authors:  Kathy L Hudson; M K Holohan; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Protecting posted genes: social networking and the limits of GINA.

Authors:  Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Emily Borgelt
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Duty to warn at-risk family members of genetic disease.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Laberge; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Virtual Mentor       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 5.  Individualized medicine from prewomb to tomb.

Authors:  Eric J Topol
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Awareness, perceptions, and provider recommendation related to genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer risk among at-risk Hispanic women: similarities and variations by sub-ethnicity.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Jessica McIntyre; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing.

Authors:  Yaping Yang; Donna M Muzny; Fan Xia; Zhiyv Niu; Richard Person; Yan Ding; Patricia Ward; Alicia Braxton; Min Wang; Christian Buhay; Narayanan Veeraraghavan; Alicia Hawes; Theodore Chiang; Magalie Leduc; Joke Beuten; Jing Zhang; Weimin He; Jennifer Scull; Alecia Willis; Megan Landsverk; William J Craigen; Mir Reza Bekheirnia; Asbjorg Stray-Pedersen; Pengfei Liu; Shu Wen; Wendy Alcaraz; Hong Cui; Magdalena Walkiewicz; Jeffrey Reid; Matthew Bainbridge; Ankita Patel; Eric Boerwinkle; Arthur L Beaudet; James R Lupski; Sharon E Plon; Richard A Gibbs; Christine M Eng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Linda Sarna; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  The influence of acculturation and breast cancer-specific distress on perceived barriers to genetic testing for breast cancer among women of African descent.

Authors:  Katarina M Sussner; Hayley S Thompson; Lina Jandorf; Tiffany A Edwards; Andrea Forman; Karen Brown; Nidhi Kapil-Pair; Dana H Bovbjerg; Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Public awareness of genetic nondiscrimination laws in four states and perceived importance of life insurance protections.

Authors:  Alicia A Parkman; Joan Foland; Beth Anderson; Debra Duquette; Holly Sobotka; Mary Lynn; Shelley Nottingham; William David Dotson; Katherine Kolor; Summer L Cox
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  3 in total

1.  National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women With a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Kimberly K Childers; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; James Macinko
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Comparing the attitudes of physicians and non-physicians toward communicating a patient's BRCA1 mutation to a first-degree relative against a patient's wishes.

Authors:  Jane E Zebrack; Wei Yang; Matthew Milone; Max J Coppes
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-05-21

Review 3.  Biobanking and risk assessment: a comprehensive typology of risks for an adaptive risk governance.

Authors:  Kaya Akyüz; Gauthier Chassang; Melanie Goisauf; Łukasz Kozera; Signe Mezinska; Olga Tzortzatou; Michaela Th Mayrhofer
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2021-12-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.