Literature DB >> 26362687

Apportionment of lumbar L2-S1 rotation across individual motion segments during a dynamic lifting task.

Ameet Aiyangar1, Liying Zheng2, William Anderst2, Xudong Zhang3.   

Abstract

Segmental apportionment of lumbar (L2-S1) rotation is a critical input parameter for musculoskeletal models and a candidate metric for clinical assessment of spinal health, but such data are sparse. This paper aims to quantify the time-variant and load-dependent characteristics of intervertebral contributions to L2-S1 extension during a dynamic lifting task. Eleven healthy participants lifted multiple weights (4.5, 9.1, and 13.6 kg) from a trunk-flexed to an upright position while being imaged by a dynamic stereo X-ray system at 30 frames/s. Vertebral (L2-S1) motion was tracked using a previously validated volumetric model-based tracking method that employs 3D bone models reconstructed from subject-specific CT images to obtain high-accuracy (≤0.26°, 0.2 mm) 3D vertebral kinematics. Individual intervertebral motions as percentages of the total L2-S1 extension were computed at each % increment of the motion to show the segmental apportionment. Results showed L3-L4 (25.8±2.2%) and L4-L5 (31±3.1%) together contributed a larger share (∼60% combined) compared to L2-L3 (21.7±3.7%) and L5-S1 (22.6±4.7%); L4-L5 consistently provided the largest contribution of the measured segments. Relative changes over time in L3-L4 (6±12.5%) and L4-L5 (0.5±10.2%) contribution were minimal; in contrast, L2-L3 (18±20.1%) contribution increased while L5-S1 (-33±22.9%) contribution decreased in a somewhat complementary fashion as motion progressed. No significant effect of the magnitude of load lifted on individual segmental contribution patterns was detected. The current study updated the knowledge regarding apportionment of lumbar (L2-S1) motion among individual segments, serving both as input into musculoskeletal models and as potential biomechanical markers of low back disorders.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apportionment; Dynamic stereo X-ray; Lifting; Lumbar spine; Vertebral motion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26362687     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Is L5-S1 motion segment different from the rest? A radiographic kinematic assessment of 72 patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Ashutosh B Sabnis; Uphar Chamoli; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Uneven intervertebral motion sharing is related to disc degeneration and is greater in patients with chronic, non-specific low back pain: an in vivo, cross-sectional cohort comparison of intervertebral dynamics using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alan Breen; Alexander Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Anti-directional cervical intervertebral motion: could it have gone any other way?

Authors:  Alan Breen
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

4.  Investigator analytic repeatability of two new intervertebral motion biomarkers for chronic, nonspecific low back pain in a cohort of healthy controls.

Authors:  Daphne To; Alexander Breen; Alan Breen; Silvano Mior; Samuel J Howarth
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-11-24

5.  Variation in lifting kinematics related to individual intrinsic lumbar curvature: an investigation in healthy adults.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Judith R Meakin; Kay Cooper; Rebecca J Barr; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-07-15

6.  A Dynamic Radiographic Imaging Study of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Morphometry and Deformation In Vivo.

Authors:  Ryan M Byrne; Ameet K Aiyangar; Xudong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.