| Literature DB >> 26361584 |
Amanda Valeta-Magara1, Raheleh Hatami1, Deborah Axelrod2, Daniel F Roses2, Amber Guth2, Silvia C Formenti3, Robert J Schneider4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The accumulation of wound fluid known as seroma in the chest cavity following breast surgery is a common occurrence that can persist for many weeks. While the pro-inflammatory composition of seroma is well established, there has been remarkably little research to determine whether seroma contains pro-oncogenic factors, and whether this is influenced by previous malignant disease.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Cytokines; Malignancy; Seroma fluid; Surgical cavity
Year: 2015 PMID: 26361584 PMCID: PMC4560730 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1260-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Patient characteristics
| Benign | Malignant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | (%) | No. | (%) | |
| No. | 24 | 40.7 | 35 | 59.3 |
| Age, years | ||||
| <55 | 19 | 79.2 | 8 | 22.9 |
| ≥55 | 5 | 20.8 | 27 | 77.1 |
| Tumor size | N/A | |||
| pT1 (≤2 cm) | 28 | 80 | ||
| pT2 (2–5 cm) | 5 | 14.3 | ||
| pT3 (>5 cm) | 2 | 5.7 | ||
| Lymph node status | N/A | |||
| Negative | 29 | 85.3 | ||
| Positive | 5 | 14.7 | ||
| Histological grade | N/A | |||
| 1 | 6 | 18.2 | ||
| 2 | 18 | 54.5 | ||
| 3 | 9 | 27.3 | ||
| Estrogen receptor status | N/A | |||
| Negative | 2 | 5.9 | ||
| Positive | 32 | 94.1 | ||
| Progesterone receptor status | N/A | |||
| Negative | 4 | 11.8 | ||
| Positive | 30 | 88.2 | ||
| HER2 status | N/A | |||
| 0 | 5 | 15.2 | ||
| 1+ | 22 | 66.7 | ||
| 2+ | 5 | 15.2 | ||
| 3+ | 1 | 3 | ||
Fig. 1Cytokines, chemokines and growth factors, associated with the wound healing response signature are highly expressed in both benign and malignant breast seroma fluid. a Quantification of array membranes. Mean levels from three independent studies of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors expressed in seroma fluid from benign (n = 24) vs. malignant (n = 35) patients are shown. b Functional analysis of cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor profiles from benign and malignant post-surgical seroma. Functional analysis indicates seromas are associated with wound healing related cellular processes
Fig. 2Factors significantly up-regulated in malignant vs. benign seroma profiles. a Relative expression of cytokines up-regulated in malignant post-operative seroma fluid compared to benign seroma. b Leptin expression in benign and malignant seroma fluid presented collectively and as BMI-matched groups. c Distribution of BMI among patients in benign and malignant groups. d Pearson correlation analysis showing a significant positive correlation of leptin expression with BMI [Pearson r = 0.6422; p < 0.0001, n = 48 (all benign and malignant seroma samples where data is available)]
Fig. 3Factors down-regulated in malignant vs. benign seroma profiles. a Relative expression of cytokines down-regulated in malignant post-operative seroma fluid compared to benign seroma. b IL-16 expression in benign and malignant seroma fluid presented collectively and at specific collection time-points post surgery (group 1 = collection time point ≤8 days and group 2 = collection time-point >8 days). c IGFBP-1 expression in benign and malignant seroma fluid presented collectively and at specific collection time-points post surgery (group 1 = collection time point ≤8 days and group 2 = collection time-point >8 days). d Pearson correlation analysis showing a significant negative correlation of IL-16 expression and collection time-point of seroma post-surgery [Pearson r = −0.6082; p < 0.0001, n = 54 (all benign and malignant seroma samples where data is available)]. e Pearson correlation analysis showing a significant negative correlation of IGFBP-1 expression and collection time-point of seroma post-surgery [Pearson r = −0.3295; p = 0.0132, n = 56 (all benign and malignant seroma samples where data is available)]
Characteristics of cytokines/growth factors differentially expressed between benign and malignant seroma fluid
| Cytokine/growth factor | Signaling pathways | Physiological function | Function in breast cancer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up-regulated in malignant vs. benign | |||
| GRO | JAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT, MAPK, PLC/PKC (KEGG Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes | Attracts and activates granulocytes (Owen and Mohamadzadeh | Supports growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells (Hartman et al. |
| ENA-78/CXCL5 | JAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT, MAPK, PLC/PKC (KEGG Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes | Chemoattractant and activator of neutrophil function (Owen and Mohamadzadeh | Promotes breast cancer cells migration, invasion (Hsu et al. |
| TIMP-2 | – | Inhibits metalloproteinase activity (Ellerbroek and Stack | TIMP-2 regulates MMP-2-mediated breast cancer cell transmigration through lung microvascular endothelial cells (Shen et al. |
| Down-regulated in malignant vs. benign | |||
| IGFBP-1 | – | Binds to IGFs and can either inhibit or stimulate their growth promoting effects (Lee et al. | Inhibits IGF-mediated breast cancer proliferation (Yee et al. |
| IL-3 | JAK/STAT, MAPK, PI3K/AKT | Haemopoietic growth factor which stimulates the production and functional activity of various blood cell types (Korpelainen et al. | Increases tumor immunogenicity-promotes macrophage infiltration and promotes development of tumor reactive cytotoxic T-cellsa (Pulaski et al. |
| IFN-γ | JAK/STAT (Schroder et al. | Important in host defense mechanisms | Inhibits cell growth (Gooch et al. |
| FGF-9 | MAPK, PI3K/AKT, PLC/PKC (Goetz and Mohammadi | Important for the regulation of embryonic development, cell proliferation, differentiation and migration (Goetz and Mohammadi | Induces cancer stem cell expansion (Fillmore et al. |
| IL-16 | Ca2+, PIP3, SAPK (Krautwald | Chemotactic for CD4+ T lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils | Promotes cell proliferationa (Atanackovic et al. |
aDemonstrated in other cancer types, function in breast cancer not yet established