Literature DB >> 26360638

Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.

S Bolormaa1,2, K Gore3, J H J van der Werf2,3, B J Hayes1,2,4, H D Daetwyler1,2,4.   

Abstract

Genotyping sheep for genome-wide SNPs at lower density and imputing to a higher density would enable cost-effective implementation of genomic selection, provided imputation was accurate enough. Here, we describe the design of a low-density (12k) SNP chip and evaluate the accuracy of imputation from the 12k SNP genotypes to 50k SNP genotypes in the major Australian sheep breeds. In addition, the impact of imperfect imputation on genomic predictions was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of genomic predictions for 15 novel meat traits including carcass and meat quality and omega fatty acid traits in sheep, from 12k SNP genotypes, imputed 50k SNP genotypes and real 50k SNP genotypes. The 12k chip design included 12 223 SNPs with a high minor allele frequency that were selected with intermarker spacing of 50-475 kb. SNPs for parentage and horned or polled tests also were represented. Chromosome ends were enriched with SNPs to reduce edge effects on imputation. The imputation performance of the 12k SNP chip was evaluated using 50k SNP genotypes of 4642 animals from six breeds in three different scenarios: (1) within breed, (2) single breed from multibreed reference and (3) multibreed from a single-breed reference. The highest imputation accuracies were found with scenario 2, whereas scenario 3 was the worst, as expected. Using scenario 2, the average imputation accuracy in Border Leicester, Polled Dorset, Merino, White Suffolk and crosses was 0.95, 0.95, 0.92, 0.91 and 0.93 respectively. Imputation scenario 2 was used to impute 50k genotypes for 10 396 animals with novel meat trait phenotypes to compare genomic prediction accuracy using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with real and imputed 50k genotypes. The weighted mean imputation accuracy achieved was 0.92. The average accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) based on only 12k data was 0.08 across traits and breeds, but accuracies varied widely. The mean GBLUP accuracies with imputed 50k data more than doubled to 0.21. Accuracies of genomic prediction were very similar for imputed and real 50k genotypes. There was no apparent impact on accuracy of GEBVs as a result of using imputed rather than real 50k genotypes, provided imputation accuracy was >90%.
© 2015 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genomic estimated breeding values; minor allele frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26360638     DOI: 10.1111/age.12340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Genet        ISSN: 0268-9146            Impact factor:   3.169


  17 in total

1.  High imputation accuracy from informative low-to-medium density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes is achievable in sheep1.

Authors:  Aine C O'Brien; Michelle M Judge; Sean Fair; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Comparing strategies for selection of low-density SNPs for imputation-mediated genomic prediction in U. S. Holsteins.

Authors:  Jun He; Jiaqi Xu; Xiao-Lin Wu; Stewart Bauck; Jungjae Lee; Gota Morota; Stephen D Kachman; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Genotyping, the Usefulness of Imputation to Increase SNP Density, and Imputation Methods and Tools.

Authors:  Florence Phocas
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Genotype imputation in the domestic dog.

Authors:  S G Friedenberg; K M Meurs
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Genetic parameter estimates and targeted association analyses of growth, carcass, and meat quality traits in German Merinoland and Merinoland-cross lambs.

Authors:  Patrick Stratz; Katja Franziska Schiller; Robin Wellmann; Siegfried Preuss; Christine Baes; Jörn Bennewitz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Optimal Design of Low-Density SNP Arrays for Genomic Prediction: Algorithm and Applications.

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Wu; Jiaqi Xu; Guofei Feng; George R Wiggans; Jeremy F Taylor; Jun He; Changsong Qian; Jiansheng Qiu; Barry Simpson; Jeremy Walker; Stewart Bauck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Multiple-trait QTL mapping and genomic prediction for wool traits in sheep.

Authors:  Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Andrew A Swan; Daniel J Brown; Sue Hatcher; Nasir Moghaddar; Julius H van der Werf; Michael E Goddard; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Using a very low-density SNP panel for genomic selection in a breeding program for sheep.

Authors:  Jérôme Raoul; Andrew A Swan; Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Assessing accuracy of imputation using different SNP panel densities in a multi-breed sheep population.

Authors:  Ricardo V Ventura; Stephen P Miller; Ken G Dodds; Benoit Auvray; Michael Lee; Matthew Bixley; Shannon M Clarke; John C McEwan
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Clinical utility of the low-density Infinium QC genotyping Array in a genomics-based diagnostics laboratory.

Authors:  Petr Ponomarenko; Alex Ryutov; Dennis T Maglinte; Ancha Baranova; Tatiana V Tatarinova; Xiaowu Gai
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.