Literature DB >> 35451774

Genotyping, the Usefulness of Imputation to Increase SNP Density, and Imputation Methods and Tools.

Florence Phocas1.   

Abstract

Imputation has become a standard practice in modern genetic research to increase genome coverage and improve accuracy of genomic selection and genome-wide association study as a large number of samples can be genotyped at lower density (and lower cost) and, imputed up to denser marker panels or to sequence level, using information from a limited reference population. Most genotype imputation algorithms use information from relatives and population linkage disequilibrium. A number of software for imputation have been developed originally for human genetics and, more recently, for animal and plant genetics considering pedigree information and very sparse SNP arrays or genotyping-by-sequencing data. In comparison to human populations, the population structures in farmed species and their limited effective sizes allow to accurately impute high-density genotypes or sequences from very low-density SNP panels and a limited set of reference individuals. Whatever the imputation method, the imputation accuracy, measured by the correct imputation rate or the correlation between true and imputed genotypes, increased with the increasing relatedness of the individual to be imputed with its denser genotyped ancestors and as its own genotype density increased. Increasing the imputation accuracy pushes up the genomic selection accuracy whatever the genomic evaluation method. Given the marker densities, the most important factors affecting imputation accuracy are clearly the size of the reference population and the relationship between individuals in the reference and target populations.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genotyping-by-sequencing; Haplotype; High density; Imputation accuracy; Imputation error rate; Low density; Phasing; SNP array; Sequence

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35451774     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  81 in total

1.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; Bryan Howie
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  John W Davey; Paul A Hohenlohe; Paul D Etter; Jason Q Boone; Julian M Catchen; Mark L Blaxter
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes.

Authors:  Yun Li; Cristen J Willer; Jun Ding; Paul Scheet; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Extremely low-coverage sequencing and imputation increases power for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Bogdan Pasaniuc; Nadin Rohland; Paul J McLaren; Kiran Garimella; Noah Zaitlen; Heng Li; Namrata Gupta; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly; Pamela Sklar; Patrick F Sullivan; Sarah Bergen; Jennifer L Moran; Christina M Hultman; Paul Lichtenstein; Patrik Magnusson; Shaun M Purcell; David W Haas; Liming Liang; Shamil Sunyaev; Nick Patterson; Paul I W de Bakker; David Reich; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle.

Authors:  A P W de Roos; B J Hayes; R J Spelman; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Sequencing depth and coverage: key considerations in genomic analyses.

Authors:  David Sims; Ian Sudbery; Nicholas E Ilott; Andreas Heger; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Potential of genotyping-by-sequencing for genomic selection in livestock populations.

Authors:  Gregor Gorjanc; Matthew A Cleveland; Ross D Houston; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Assessment of alternative genotyping strategies to maximize imputation accuracy at minimal cost.

Authors:  Yijian Huang; John M Hickey; Matthew A Cleveland; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers.

Authors:  Nathan A Baird; Paul D Etter; Tressa S Atwood; Mark C Currey; Anthony L Shiver; Zachary A Lewis; Eric U Selker; William A Cresko; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development of a High-Density 665 K SNP Array for Rainbow Trout Genome-Wide Genotyping.

Authors:  Maria Bernard; Audrey Dehaullon; Guangtu Gao; Katy Paul; Henri Lagarde; Mathieu Charles; Martin Prchal; Jeanne Danon; Lydia Jaffrelo; Charles Poncet; Pierre Patrice; Pierrick Haffray; Edwige Quillet; Mathilde Dupont-Nivet; Yniv Palti; Delphine Lallias; Florence Phocas
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.772

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.