Wouter-Jan Rappel1, Junaid A B Zaman2, Sanjiv M Narayan1. 1. From the Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego (W.-J.R.); Department of Cardiology, Imperial College, University of London, London, United Kingdom (J.A.B.Z.); and Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (J.A.B.Z., S.M.N.). rappel@physics.ucsd.edu sanjiv1@stanford.edu. 2. From the Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego (W.-J.R.); Department of Cardiology, Imperial College, University of London, London, United Kingdom (J.A.B.Z.); and Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (J.A.B.Z., S.M.N.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human atrial fibrillation (AF) can terminate after ablating localized regions, which supports the existence of localized rotors (spiral waves) or focal drivers. However, it is unclear why ablation near a spiral wave tip would terminate AF and not anchor reentry. We addressed this question by analyzing competing mechanisms for AF termination in numeric simulations, referenced to clinical observations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Spiral wave reentry was simulated in monodomain 2-dimensional myocyte sheets using clinically realistic rate-dependent values for repolarization and conduction. Heterogeneous models were created by introduction of parameterized variations in tissue excitability. Ablation lesions were applied as nonconducting circular regions. Models confirmed that localized ablation may anchor spiral wave reentry, producing organized tachycardias. Several mechanisms referenced to clinical observations explained termination of AF to sinus rhythm. First, lesions may create an excitable gap vulnerable to invasion by fibrillatory waves. Second, ablation of rotors in regions of low-excitability (from remodeling) produced re-entry in more excitable tissue allowing collision of wavefront and back. Conversely, ablation of rotors in high-excitability regions migrated spiral waves to less excitable tissue, where they detached to collide with nonconducting boundaries. Third, ablation may connect rotors to nonconducting anatomic orifices. Fourth, reentry through slow-conducting channels may terminate if ablation closes these channels. CONCLUSIONS: Limited ablation can terminate AF by several mechanisms. These data shed light on how clinical AF may be sustained in patients' atria, emphasizing heterogeneities in tissue excitability, slow-conducting channels, and obstacles that are increasingly detectable in patients and should be the focus of future translational studies.
BACKGROUND:Humanatrial fibrillation (AF) can terminate after ablating localized regions, which supports the existence of localized rotors (spiral waves) or focal drivers. However, it is unclear why ablation near a spiral wave tip would terminate AF and not anchor reentry. We addressed this question by analyzing competing mechanisms for AF termination in numeric simulations, referenced to clinical observations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Spiral wave reentry was simulated in monodomain 2-dimensional myocyte sheets using clinically realistic rate-dependent values for repolarization and conduction. Heterogeneous models were created by introduction of parameterized variations in tissue excitability. Ablation lesions were applied as nonconducting circular regions. Models confirmed that localized ablation may anchor spiral wave reentry, producing organized tachycardias. Several mechanisms referenced to clinical observations explained termination of AF to sinus rhythm. First, lesions may create an excitable gap vulnerable to invasion by fibrillatory waves. Second, ablation of rotors in regions of low-excitability (from remodeling) produced re-entry in more excitable tissue allowing collision of wavefront and back. Conversely, ablation of rotors in high-excitability regions migrated spiral waves to less excitable tissue, where they detached to collide with nonconducting boundaries. Third, ablation may connect rotors to nonconducting anatomic orifices. Fourth, reentry through slow-conducting channels may terminate if ablation closes these channels. CONCLUSIONS: Limited ablation can terminate AF by several mechanisms. These data shed light on how clinical AF may be sustained in patients' atria, emphasizing heterogeneities in tissue excitability, slow-conducting channels, and obstacles that are increasingly detectable in patients and should be the focus of future translational studies.
Authors: Matthew J Gonzales; Kevin P Vincent; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Andrew D McCulloch Journal: Europace Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Gautam G Lalani; Amir Schricker; Michael Gibson; Armand Rostamian; David E Krummen; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Richard T Carrick; Bryce Benson; Nicole Habel; Oliver R J Bates; Jason H T Bates; Peter S Spector Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-09-15
Authors: Vijay Swarup; Tina Baykaner; Armand Rostamian; James P Daubert; John Hummel; David E Krummen; Rishi Trikha; John M Miller; Gery F Tomassoni; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-11-11
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; Michael R Franz; Paul Clopton; Etienne J Pruvot; David E Krummen Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-06-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vias Markides; Richard J Schilling; Siew Yen Ho; Anthony W C Chow; D Wyn Davies; Nicholas S Peters Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Amir A Schricker; Gautam G Lalani; David E Krummen; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-09-12
Authors: Kalyanam Shivkumar; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; John D Hummel; John M Miller; Jonathan S Steinberg Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2012-11-06
Authors: Christopher A B Kowalewski; Fatemah Shenasa; Miguel Rodrigo; Paul Clopton; Gabriela Meckler; Mahmood I Alhusseini; Mark A Swerdlow; Vijay Joshi; Samir Hossainy; Junaid A B Zaman; Tina Baykaner; Albert J Rogers; Johannes Brachmann; John M Miller; David E Krummen; William H Sauer; Nicholas S Peters; Paul J Wang; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2018-06
Authors: George Leef; Fatemah Shenasa; Neal K Bhatia; Albert J Rogers; William Sauer; John M Miller; Mark Swerdlow; Mallika Tamboli; Mahmood I Alhusseini; Erin Armenia; Tina Baykaner; Johannes Brachmann; Mintu P Turakhia; Felipe Atienza; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Paul J Wang; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2019-07-29
Authors: Francisco Sahli Costabal; Felipe A Concha; Daniel E Hurtado; Ellen Kuhl Journal: Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 6.756