Amir A Schricker1, Gautam G Lalani1, David E Krummen1, Wouter-Jan Rappel1, Sanjiv M Narayan2. 1. From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego and the Veterans Administration San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA (A.A.S., G.G.L., D.E.K., S.M.N.), and the Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, CA (W.J.R.). 2. From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego and the Veterans Administration San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA (A.A.S., G.G.L., D.E.K., S.M.N.), and the Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, CA (W.J.R.). sanjiv1@stanford.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unknown how atrial fibrillation (AF) is actually initiated by triggers. Based on consistencies in atrial structure and function in individual patients between episodes of AF, we hypothesized that human AF initiates when triggers interact with deterministic properties of the atria and may engage organized mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 31 patients with AF, we mapped AF initiation after spontaneous triggers or programmed stimulation. We used 64-pole basket catheters to measure regional dynamic conduction slowing and to create biatrial activation maps during transitions to AF. Sixty-two AF initiations were recorded (spontaneous, n=28; induced, n=34). Notably, AF did not initiate by disorganized mechanisms, but by either a dominant reentrant spiral wave (76%) or a repetitive focal driver. Both mechanisms were located 21±17 mm from their triggers. AF-initiating spirals formed at the site showing the greatest rate-dependent slowing in each patient. Accordingly, in 10 of 12 patients with multiple observed AF episodes, AF initiated using spatially conserved mechanisms despite diverse triggers. CONCLUSIONS: Human AF initiates from triggers by organized rather than disorganized mechanisms, either via spiral wave re-entry at sites of dynamic conduction slowing or via repetitive focal drivers. The finding that diverse triggers initiate AF at predictable, spatially conserved functional sites in each individual provides a novel deterministic paradigm for AF with therapeutic implications.
BACKGROUND: It is unknown how atrial fibrillation (AF) is actually initiated by triggers. Based on consistencies in atrial structure and function in individual patients between episodes of AF, we hypothesized that humanAF initiates when triggers interact with deterministic properties of the atria and may engage organized mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 31 patients with AF, we mapped AF initiation after spontaneous triggers or programmed stimulation. We used 64-pole basket catheters to measure regional dynamic conduction slowing and to create biatrial activation maps during transitions to AF. Sixty-two AF initiations were recorded (spontaneous, n=28; induced, n=34). Notably, AF did not initiate by disorganized mechanisms, but by either a dominant reentrant spiral wave (76%) or a repetitive focal driver. Both mechanisms were located 21±17 mm from their triggers. AF-initiating spirals formed at the site showing the greatest rate-dependent slowing in each patient. Accordingly, in 10 of 12 patients with multiple observed AF episodes, AF initiated using spatially conserved mechanisms despite diverse triggers. CONCLUSIONS:HumanAF initiates from triggers by organized rather than disorganized mechanisms, either via spiral wave re-entry at sites of dynamic conduction slowing or via repetitive focal drivers. The finding that diverse triggers initiate AF at predictable, spatially conserved functional sites in each individual provides a novel deterministic paradigm for AF with therapeutic implications.
Authors: W M Jackman; X Z Wang; K J Friday; C A Roman; K P Moulton; K J Beckman; J H McClelland; N Twidale; H A Hazlitt; M I Prior Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sorin Lazar; Sanjay Dixit; Francis E Marchlinski; David J Callans; Edward P Gerstenfeld Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-11-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas Arentz; Reinhold Weber; Gerd Bürkle; Claudia Herrera; Thomas Blum; Jochem Stockinger; Jan Minners; Franz Josef Neumann; Dietrich Kalusche Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christopher J McGann; Eugene G Kholmovski; Robert S Oakes; Joshua J E Blauer; Marcos Daccarett; Nathan Segerson; Kelly J Airey; Nazem Akoum; Eric Fish; Troy J Badger; Edward V R DiBella; Dennis Parker; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: David E Krummen; Shrinivas Hebsur; Jon Salcedo; Sanjiv M Narayan; Gautam G Lalani; Amir A Schricker Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2015-04
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; Mohan N Vishwanathan; Christopher A B Kowalewski; Tina Baykaner; Miguel Rodrigo; Junaid A B Zaman; Paul J Wang Journal: Rev Port Cardiol Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 1.374
Authors: Rachita Navara; George Leef; Fatemah Shenasa; Christopher Kowalewski; Albert J Rogers; Gabriela Meckler; Junaid A B Zaman; Tina Baykaner; Shirley Park; Mintu P Turakhia; Paul Zei; Mohan Viswanathan; Paul J Wang; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2018-02-22
Authors: Tina Baykaner; Theodoros A Zografos; Junaid A B Zaman; Ioannis Pantos; Mahmood Alhusseini; Rachita Navara; David E Krummen; Sanjiv M Narayan; Demosthenes G Katritsis Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 4.164