| Literature DB >> 26357927 |
Ronan Van Rossem1, Dominique Meekers2, Anastasia J Gage3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is still widespread in Egyptian society. It is strongly entrenched in local tradition and culture and has a strong link to the position of women. To eradicate the practice a major attitudinal change is a required for which an improvement in the social position of women is a prerequisite. This study examines the relationship between Egyptian women's social positions and their attitudes towards FGM, and investigates whether the spread of anti-FGM attitudes is related to the observed improvements in the position of women over time.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26357927 PMCID: PMC4566495 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2203-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 3Graphic representation of the interaction effects of labour market position with EDHS wave
Fig. 4Graphic representation of the interaction effects of education with EDHS wave
Descriptive statistics for control variables
| Variable | F | f |
|---|---|---|
| Should FGM be discontinued | ||
| No | 75310 | 77.5 % |
| Yes | 21914 | 22.5 % |
| Region | ||
| Urban Governorates | 16967 | 17.4 % |
| Lower Egypt - Urban | 11410 | 11.7 % |
| Lower Egypt - Rural | 32421 | 33.3 % |
| Upper Egypt - Urban | 11076 | 11.4 % |
| Upper Egypt - Rural | 24417 | 25.1 % |
| Frontier Governorate | 983 | 1.0 % |
| De facto place of residence | ||
| Urban | 40053 | 41.2 % |
| Capital, large city | 16807 | 17.3 % |
| Small city | 11717 | 12.0 % |
| Town | 3905 | 4.0 % |
| Urban (2014) | 7623 | 7.8 % |
| Rural | 57221 | 58.8 % |
| Current age | ||
| Mean & SD | 33.13 | 8.65 |
| 15–19 | 3818 | 3.9 % |
| 20–24 | 14359 | 14.8 % |
| 25–29 | 19286 | 19.8 % |
| 30–34 | 16721 | 17.2 % |
| 35–39 | 16107 | 16.6 % |
| 40–44 | 13816 | 14.2 % |
| 45–49 | 13166 | 13.5 % |
| Total number of children ever born | ||
| Mean & SD | 3.14 | 2.24 |
| 0 | 9051 | 9.3 % |
| 1 | 13559 | 13.9 % |
| 2 | 20115 | 20.7 % |
| 3 | 19792 | 20.3 % |
| 4 | 13277 | 13.6 % |
| 5 | 8216 | 8.4 % |
| 6 | 5124 | 5.3 % |
| 7+ | 8141 | 8.4 % |
| Ever circumcised | ||
| No | 4328 | 4.5 % |
| Yes | 92894 | 95.5 % |
| Religion | ||
| Muslim | 69049 | 71.0 % |
| Christian | 3447 | 3.5 % |
| Other/Missing | 24778 | 25.5 % |
| Labor market participation | ||
| Not working | 78862 | 81.1 % |
| Prof., Tech., Manag. | 7260 | 7.5 % |
| Clerical | 2760 | 2.8 % |
| Sales | 1429 | 1.5 % |
| Agriculture-self employed | 1508 | 1.6 % |
| Agriculture-employee | 2382 | 2.4 % |
| Services | 1498 | 1.5 % |
| Skilled manual | 1094 | 1.1 % |
| Other | 481 | 0.5 % |
| Basic amenities index | ||
| Mean & SD | 6.02 | 1.74 |
| Few (0–3) | 7987 | 8.2 % |
| Some (4–5) | 13415 | 13.8 % |
| Most (6–8) | 75875 | 78.0 % |
| Highest educational level | ||
| No formal education | 33924 | 34.9 % |
| Primary | 15408 | 15.8 % |
| Secondary | 37894 | 39.0 % |
| Higher | 10049 | 10.3 % |
| Literacy | ||
| Illiterate | 39217 | 40.4 % |
| Partially literate | 6878 | 7.1 % |
| Fully literate | 51088 | 52.6 % |
Legend: F: absolute frequency, f: relative frequency
Fig. 1Trend in opposition to FGM among ever-married Egyptian women, 1995–2014
Fig. 2Trends in the education level, literacy, work status and basic amenities of eve-married Egyptian women, 1995–2014
Multilevel logistic regression results for opposition to the continuation of FGM in Egypt
| b (95 % CI) | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Constant | −0.139 | −0.754*** |
| (−0.776–0.498) | (−1.140–−0.368) | |
| Region (ref: Urban Governorates) | *** | *** |
| Lower-Egypt - Urban | −0.324*** | −0.331*** |
| (−0.498–−0.150) | (−0.511–−0.151) | |
| Lower-Egypt - Rural | −0.919*** | −0.937*** |
| (−1.274–−0.564) | (−1.309–−0.565) | |
| Upper-Egypt - Urban | −0.537*** | −0.548*** |
| (−0.657–−0.417) | (−0.662–−0.434) | |
| Upper-Egypt - Rural | −1.018*** | −1.037*** |
| (−1.208–−0.828) | (−1.251–−0.823) | |
| Frontier Governorates | −0.116 | −0.120 |
| (−0.339–0.107) | (−0.349–0.109) | |
| Religion (ref: Muslim) | *** | *** |
| Christian | 1.623*** | 1.665*** |
| (1.396–1.850) | (1.432–1.898) | |
| Other/missing | −0.132 | 0.280 |
| (−0.350–0.086) | (−0.002–0.562) | |
| Respondent circumcised | −2.150*** | −2.202*** |
| (−2.446–−1.854) | (−2.520–−1.884) | |
| Number of children born | −0.127*** | −0.130*** |
| (−0.141–−0.113) | (−0.146–−0.114) | |
| Age | 0.023*** | 0.024*** |
| (0.013–0.033) | (0.014–0.034) | |
| Rural residence | 0.076 | 0.078 |
| (−0.200–0.352) | (−0.208–0.364) | |
| Labor market position (ref: Not working) | *** | *** |
| Professional, technical or managerial occupations | 0.157*** | 0.161*** |
| (0.096–0.218) | (0.094–0.228) | |
| Clerical | 0.243*** | 0.253*** |
| (0.127–0.359) | (0.139–0.367) | |
| Sales | −0.132 | −0.136 |
| (−0.344–0.080) | (−0.354–0.082) | |
| Agriculture, self-employed | −0.500*** | −0.501*** |
| (−0.706–−0.294) | (−0.721–−0.281) | |
| Agriculture, employee | −0.543** | −0.540** |
| (−0.935–−0.151) | (−0.924–−0.156) | |
| Services | 0.256** | 0.259** |
| (0.093–0.419) | (0.098–0.420) | |
| Skilled manual labor | −0.130 | −0.133 |
| (−0.271–0.011) | (−0.276–0.010) | |
| Other/missing | −0.229 | −0.232 |
| (−0.697–0.239) | (−0.698–0.234) | |
| Education level (ref; No formal education) | *** | *** |
| Primary | 0.094 | 0.094 |
| (−0.010–0.198) | (−0.012–0.200) | |
| Secondary | 0.501*** | 0.508*** |
| (0.232–0.770) | (0.243–0.773) | |
| Higher | 1.138*** | 1.158*** |
| (0.777–1.499) | (0.809–1.507) | |
| Literacy (ref: Illiterate) | *** | *** |
| Partially literate | 0.321*** | 0.327*** |
| (0.258–0.384) | (0.260–0.394) | |
| Fully literate | 0.552*** | 0.560*** |
| (0.311–0.793) | (0.299–0.821) | |
| Basic amenities | 0.036** | 0.037** |
| (0.012–0.060) | (0.010–0.064) | |
| EDHS wave (ref: 1995) | *** | |
| 2000 | 0.029 | |
| (−0.251–0.309) | ||
| 2003 | 0.190 | |
| (−0.086–0.466) | ||
| 2005 | 0.691*** | |
| (0.658–0.724) | ||
| 2008 | 0.952*** | |
| (0.915–0.989) | ||
| 2014 | 1.010*** | |
| (0.947–1.073) | ||
| var(Constante) | 0.100* | 0.000 |
| (0.016–0.184) | (0.000–0.000) |
Legend: b: partial logistic regression coefficient; 95 % CI: 95 % confidence interval for coefficient
Significance: ***: p < .001, **: p < .010; *: p < 0.050