| Literature DB >> 26356120 |
Barbara Mali, Vojka Gorjup, Ibrahim Edhemovic, Erik Brecelj, Maja Cemazar, Gregor Sersa, Branka Strazisar, Damijan Miklavcic, Tomaz Jarm.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a combined treatment in which high voltage electroporation (EP) pulses are used to facilitate the uptake of a chemotherapeutic drug into tumor cells, thus increasing antitumor effectiveness of the drug. The effect of ECT of deep-seated tumors located close to the heart on functioning of the heart has not been previously investigated. In this study, we investigate the effects of intra-abdominal ECT of colorectal liver metastases on functioning of the heart during the early post-operative care period.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26356120 PMCID: PMC4565110 DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-14-S3-S5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Main characteristics of the patients, tumors and EP pulse delivery for individual patient and tumor.
| PATIENT | TUMOR | ELECTROPORATION PULSE DELIVERY | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | 56 | none | M1 | 1.0 × 1.0 | variable, 3 cm | 5 | 65 | 1695 | 16.69 | 196.1 | 471.2 | |
| M | 54 | none | M1 | 2.0 × 2.0 | variable, 3 cm | 6 | 110 | 2810 | 29.72 | 867.2 | 1567.9 | |
| M | 69 | hypertension, mild mitral regurgitation | M1 | 3.5 × 2.5 | fixed, 3 cm | 7 | 672 | 713 | 6.67 | 321.8 | 369.2 | |
| M | 59 | none | M1 | 1.0 × 1.0 | variable, 3 cm | 5 | 64 | 1052 | 10.58 | 75.7 | 165.3 | |
| F | 38 | none | M1 | 1.0 × 1.0 | variable, 3 cm | 5 | 64 | 1778 | 26.82 | 312.1 | 578.5 | |
| M | 69 | hypertension | M1 | 1.7 × 1.0 | variable, 3 cm | 5 | 64 | 1924 | 24.40 | 304.7 | 482.4 | |
| F | 57 | hypertension | M1 | 2.5 × 2.5 | fixed, 3 cm | 7 | 288 | 713 | 9.02 | 184.4 | 406.4 | |
| M | 63 | hypertension | M1 | 3.0 × 2.5 | variable, 3 cm | 5 | 75 | 2421 | 46.13 | 5976.0 | 5976.0 | |
| M | 61 | hypertension | M1 | 1.0 × 1.0 | fixed, 3 cm | 7 | 96 | 718 | 4.59 | 32.0 | 113.5 | |
| F | 62 | hypertension | M1 | 3.5 × 3.0 | variable, 3 cm | 6 | 104 | 2533 | 31.50 | 802.6 | 1605.2c | |
a Patient numbers according to Edhemovic et al. [6], where more patients' details can be found. For patients not included in this study see the explanation in the Methods section.
b The two longest perpendicular tumor diameters were estimated using ultrasound imaging during intra-abdominal surgery.
c The data for voltage and current in tumor M2 in patient No. 15 was corrupted; therefore the total energy applied to the patient was estimated as twice the energy applied to tumor M1 since almost the same parameters of EP pulse delivery were used for both tumors.
Time-domain linear and nonlinear and frequency-domain HRV measures used in this study.
| Parameter | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ms | Mean of normal-to-normal (NN) intervals | |
| ms | Standard deviation of NN intervals; an estimate of overall HRV | |
| ms | Standard deviation of differences between adjacent NN intervals; an estimate of short-term HRV; associated with parasympathetic activity | |
| ms | Square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals; an estimate of short-term HRV; associated with parasympathetic activity | |
| % | Number of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms divided by the total number of all NN intervals | |
| ms | Standard deviation of the Poincaré plot perpendicular to the line-of-identity; the shortest diameter of the fitted ellipse; an estimate of short-term HRV; associated with parasympathetic activity | |
| ms | Standard deviation of the Poincaré plot along the line-of-identity; the longest diameter of the fitted ellipse; an estimate of long-term HRV; associated with sympathetic activity | |
| - | Ratio of SD1 to SD2; describes the ratio of short-term to long-term HRV; describes the relationship between parasympathetic and sympathetic activity | |
| ms2 | Power in low frequency range (0.04-0.15 Hz); estimate of long-term HRV; reflects both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity | |
| n.u. | Normalized power of LF; LF/(LF+HF)x100; estimate of long-term HRV; reflects both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity | |
| ms2 | Power in high frequency range (0.15-0.4 Hz); estimate of short-term HRV; reflects parasympathetic (vagal) activity | |
| n.u. | Normalized power of HF; HF/(LF+HF)x100; estimate of short-term HRV; reflects parasympathetic activity | |
| - | Ratio between LF and HF range powers; describes the relationship between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, i.e. sympathovagal balance | |
Analyzed ECG leads and heartbeat intervals.
| Patient number | ECG lead used for analysis before/after ECT | Analyzed | No. of beats before ECT procedure | No. of beats after ECT procedure | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | A (%) | ST (%) | N | A (%) | ST (%) | |||
| II / II | NN, ppQTc | 14317 | 12 (0.084) | 0 (0) | 14216 | 17 (0.119) | 0 (0) | |
| II / II | NN, ppQTc | 15722 | 3 (0.019) | 15692 (99.8) | 18112 | 1 (0.006) | 14001 (77.3) | |
| II / II | NN | 13975 | 309 (2.163) | 0 (0) | 18271 | 8 (0.044) | 0 (0) | |
| II / II | NN, ppQTc | 16873 | 20 (0.118) | 0 (0) | 18820 | 15 (0.080) | 2321 (12.3) | |
| II / V6 | NN | 18321 | 18 (0.098) | 6915 (37.7) | 26047 | 9 (0.035) | 0 (0) | |
| V6 / I | NN | 14785 | 70 (0.471) | 0 (0) | 15202 | 23 (0.151) | 763 (5.02) | |
| V6 / V6 | NN, ppQTc | 18825 | 42 (0.223) | 0 (0) | 17764 | 6 (0.034) | 4395 (24.7) | |
| II / II | NN, ppQTc | 13864 | 6 (0.043) | 0 (0) | 19405 | 8 (0.044) | 3209 (16.5) | |
| V6 / V6 | NN, ppQTc | 13857 | 135 (0.965) | 10111 (73.0) | 16620 | 0 (0) | 7078 (42.6) | |
| II / II | NN, ppQTc | 17461 | 25 (0.143) | 696 (3.99) | 26450 | 39 (0.147) | 25188 (95.3) | |
| 158000 | 640 (0.403) | 33414 (21.1) | 190907 | 126 (0.034) | 56955 (29.8) | |||
NN: normal-to-normal heartbeat interval; ppQTc: corrected peak-to-peak QT interval; N: number of heartbeats classified as normal; A: number of heartbeats classified as abnormal; ST: number of heartbeats with ST segment deviation.
Median changes in ECG and HRV parameters after ECT.
| Evaluated parameters | Median change | Percentile |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 75% | |||
| -5.03 | -17.40 | 2.45 | 0.469 | |
| -161.00 | -260.66 | -25.05 | ||
| -11.05 | -18.09 | -3.12 | 0.131 | |
| -3.86 | -11.26 | 0.272 | 0.232 | |
| -3.85 | -11.24 | 0.275 | 0.232 | |
| -0.18 | -1.50 | 0.00 | 0.461 | |
| -2.73 | -7.96 | 0.19 | 0.232 | |
| -15.95 | -26.43 | -3.52 | 0.065 | |
| 0.01 | -0.11 | 0.12 | 0.695 | |
| -93.15 | -303.13 | -30.15 | ||
| -9.93 | -49.76 | 38.86 | 0.625 | |
| -12.56 | -16.81 | -10.49 | ||
| 12.56 | 10.49 | 16.81 | ||
| -1.04 | -3.26 | -0.90 | 0.432 | |
Definitions of parameters are given in Table 2. Statistical significance of the change is presented in the right-most column (Wilcoxon signed rank test).
Correlation between changes in the ECG and HRV parameters and the EP pulse delivery parameters.
| Compared parameters | No. of delivered EP pulses | Average U applied to tumors | Average I applied to tumors | Total energy applied to patient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.919 | 0.399 | 0.210 | 0.154 | |
| 0.315 | 0.522 | 0.953 | ||
| 0.239 | 0.616 | 0.271 | 0.060 | |
| 0.239 | 0.616 | 0.271 | 0.060 |
Correlation was evaluated for ECG and HRV parameters with statistically significant change after ECT from Table 4. Values of p (statistical significance of the correlation) are given in the table.