[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes of cardiopulmonary function in normal adults after the Rockport 1 mile walking test. [Subjects and Methods] University students (13 males and 27 females) participated in this study. Before and after the Rockport 1 mile walking test, pulmonary function, respiratory pressure, and maximal oxygen uptake were measured. [Results] Significant improvements in forced vital capacity and maximal inspiratory pressure were observed after the Rockport 1 mile walking test in males, and significant improvements in forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume at 1 s, maximal inspiratory pressure, and maximal expiratory pressure were observed after the Rockport 1 mile walking test in females. However, the maximal oxygen uptake was not significantly different. [Conclusion] Our findings indicate that the Rockport 1 mile walking test changes cardiopulmonary function in males and females, and that it may improve cardiopulmonary function in middle-aged and older adults and provide basic data on cardiopulmonary endurance.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes of cardiopulmonary function in normal adults after the Rockport 1 mile walking test. [Subjects and Methods] University students (13 males and 27 females) participated in this study. Before and after the Rockport 1 mile walking test, pulmonary function, respiratory pressure, and maximal oxygen uptake were measured. [Results] Significant improvements in forced vital capacity and maximal inspiratory pressure were observed after the Rockport 1 mile walking test in males, and significant improvements in forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume at 1 s, maximal inspiratory pressure, and maximal expiratory pressure were observed after the Rockport 1 mile walking test in females. However, the maximal oxygen uptake was not significantly different. [Conclusion] Our findings indicate that the Rockport 1 mile walking test changes cardiopulmonary function in males and females, and that it may improve cardiopulmonary function in middle-aged and older adults and provide basic data on cardiopulmonary endurance.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aerobic fitness; Respiratory function; Rockport 1 mile walking test
Walking is generally perceived as a means of improving health and fitness, and is one of
the most natural human motions1). Regular
walking exercise can improve the mental state, muscle strength, and the ability to
metabolize sugar by improving the insulin concentration in fat and the insulin response to
blood sugar2). In addition, it has a
positive effect on cardiovascular patients and reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Furthermore, it has been reported that walking-based exercises improve the activities of
daily living and the quality of life of elderly people3).Walking exercise increases respiration, which is a means of generating energy. Two muscle
groups control respiration, namely inspiratory and expiratory muscles. The diaphragm and
intercostal externi are agonists of inspiration for tidal breathing, and the synergistic
muscles are the sternocleidomastoid, scalene, pectoralis major, pectoralis minor, and
serratus anterior, which are activated during deep, forced, and labored breathing. Muscles
related to expiration not activated during normal breathing but are activated during deep
and forced breathing include the rectus abdominis, transverse abdominis, internal and
external obliques, and intercostalis interni4).“Aerobic” indicates energy generation by using oxygen, and aerobic exercise is active,
durational, and rhythmic and has a substantial effect on cardiopulmonary endurance. Walking,
jogging, skipping, aerobics, dancing, swimming, and cycling are all aerobic exercises that
facilitate cardiopulmonary function because they require large amounts of oxygen to be
supplied to the body5).Walking exercise is efficient because it is an energy-consuming, convenient, and low-impact
aerobic exercise, and is widely performed by people regardless of gender or age to improve
health. Furthermore, it is safe; for example, it is prescribed as a low-impact exercise for
the knee joints6).The Rockport 1 mile walking test (RWT) is the most commonly used field test to assess
cardiopulmonary fitness and provides a representative means of predicting aerobic fitness
based on gender, age, body mass index, and heart rate information7). However, no study has yet investigated cardiopulmonary
function after the RWT. Therefore, in this study, we measured pulmonary functions,
respiratory pressures, and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) after the RWT, and
investigated changes in cardiopulmonary competence in males and females.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Forty university students were recruited for this study. All subjects understood the
purpose of this study and provided written informed consent before participation. This study
was approved by the institutional review board of Daegu University. Recruited subjects with
a diagnosis of cardiac disease and those who perform aerobic exercise regularly were
excluded.Pulmonary function, respiratory pressure, and VO2max were measured after the
RWT. Before the RWT, height and weight were measured by using a stadiometer (Biospace,
Korea). To measure the VO2max, heart rate was measured for 60 s immediately after
the RWT. The formula used to calculate VO2max was as follows7):VOFor the sex score, males were given a score of 1 and females a score of 0. Walking time was
calculated in minutes. Pulmonary function measures, such as forced vital capacity (FVC),
forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, and peak
expiratory flow (PEF), were measured after the RWT by using a portable spirometer
(Spiropalm; Cosmed, Italy). The subjects were instructed to sit on a chair in an upright
posture and to exhale into a mouthpiece. The maximal air speed and volume at maximum
inspiration were recorded. The maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory
pressure (MEP) were measured to determine the PImax values by using a respiratory pressure
meter (MicroRPM; CareFusion, Ireland). Maximum inhalations and exhalations were performed in
a comfortable sitting position. The RWT was performed on a treadmill after stretching and
slow-walking practice. The participants were instructed to walk as fast as possible but not
to run. The speed of the treadmill began at 0.5 mph and then was increased to 3.0 mph and to
3.5 mph. Perceived exertion (PE) was rated during the walk test.Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographic data, and the paired t-test was
used to compare differences between pre- and post-RWT. Statistical analysis was performed
with the PASW ver. 18.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), and statistical
significance was accepted for p values <0.05.
RESULTS
The general characteristics of the 40 subjects are provided in Table 1. In males, the FVC and MIP significantly changed after the RWT; however, the
FEV1/FVC, MEP, and VO2max did not. In females, the FVC,
FEV1/FVC, MIP, and MEP changed significantly after the RWT. In males and
females, the VO2max changed after the RWT; however, the difference was not
significant (Table 2).
Table 1.
General characteristics of the subjects
Males (n = 13)
Females (n = 27)
Age (years)
25.9±5.0
22.1±0.6
Height (cm)
174.7±5.5
161.6±5.0
Weight (kg)
67.6±7.0
54.9±8.2
Values are expressed as mean ± SD
Table 2.
Comparison of changes in respiratory function and maximum oxygen uptake in men
and women
Males (n = 13)
Females (n = 27)
Pre-RWT
Post-RWT
Pre-RWT
Post-RWT
Respiratory function
FVC (l)
3.5±0.8
4.1±0.6*
2.4±0.4
2.7±0.4*
FEV1/ FVC (%)
3.3±0.8
3.8±0.5
2.2±0.4
2.5±0.4*
MIP (cmH2O)
82.1±16.1
94.5±18.6*
53.0±15.7
67.0±21.4*
MEP (cmH2O)
75.6±24.4
84.4±26.9
52.2±13.9
65.4±22.4*
VO2max
(mL·kg−1·min−1)
45.2±12.1
53.8±7.2
42.8±11.3
43.7±11.4
Asterisk (*) indicates a significant change pre-to-post RWT at the p < 0.05
level.
Values are expressed as mean ± SDAsterisk (*) indicates a significant change pre-to-post RWT at the p < 0.05
level.
DISCUSSION
This study was undertaken to investigate the changes in cardiopulmonary functions, such as
pulmonary function, respiratory pressure, and VO2max, after the RWT. This test is
not only useful for measuring cardiopulmonary efficiency but is also easily applied and
requires little equipment. Furthermore, it can be used to predict cardiopulmonary endurance
and physical fitness in all ages8).Pulmonary function is commonly measured by evaluating the FVC, FEV1,
FEV1/FVC, and PEF. The MIP and MEP are the most commonly used variables in
assessing respiratory muscle pressure because they are easy to evaluate and the measurements
have fewer adverse effects9). Respiratory
competence has been widely used to diagnose and monitor pulmonary function and respiratory
pressure in many studies10, 11).In females, significant differences were observed for FEV1/FVC and MEP after the
RWT, which suggests that the RWT has positive effects on pulmonary function and respiratory
pressure in both males and females. However, the VO2max increased marginally and
FVC significantly increased. This result is in line with the results of a previous
randomized control study, in which treadmill gait exercise was performed for 30–45 min at
70–80% heart rate, by using the Naughton protocol in patients with pulmonary
hypertension12). In addition,
significant differences in FVC were reported after testing in another study that
investigated the cardiopulmonary function of 13 children with cystic fibrosis after the
6-min walk test13).We considered that the respiratory pressure was changed by the coactivations of respiratory
muscles during the RWT, which is in line with the conclusion of a previous study that
inspiratory muscle training and expiratory muscle training help improve muscle strength and
endurance by applying load to the diaphragm and accessory muscles14).The VO2max is a more representative index of physical endurance than parameters
such as pulmonary ventilatory capacity and cardiac output, and thus, it is widely used to
investigate maximum exercise performance and cardiopulmonary endurance. The
VO2max is defined as the maximum volume of oxygen that the human body can absorb
per unit time during exercise. In addition, the relation between muscle activity and oxygen
consumption is important and is widely used to analyze endurance because it provides a
measure of oxygen transport15). In the
present study, VO2max values were found to be nonsignificantly higher post-RWT,
and we attribute this lack of significance to individual differences in muscle mass, gait
pattern, and walking speed. It has been reported that mild aerobic exercise uses fat as a
fuel, and thus, aids in weight maintenance. In a study that compared heavy- and
mild-intensity exercises, no postexercise difference in body composition was observed in the
heavy-exercise group, but a significant difference was noted in the mild-exercise group,
which suggests that mild-intensity exercise is more effective at reducing body fat levels.
Furthermore, it was found that the cardiovascular systems of females who performed
mild-exercise programs improved as much as those who performed jogging and cycling
exercises16, 17).Physical activities and exercise consume energy and have a positive effect on health and
physical fitness. Walking is an everyday activity, and can be performed safely in parks and
living spaces. Regular walking can improve cardiopulmonary function and endurance18) and retard the progression of degenerative
and metabolic diseases, in addition to its many social and psychological benefits19).In this pilot study, the respiratory function after the RWT showed various changes, and it
is believed that walking training may influence respiratory function and cardiopulmonary
endurance in normal adults and in the elderly.Some limitations of this study should be considered. First, this study was performed with a
single measurement design; thus, we cannot comment on long-term effects. Second, the number
of subjects recruited was too small to allow drawing generalizations. Third, only young
healthy male and female subjects were selected. Thus, further studies with middle-aged and
elderly participants are needed to confirm the clinical associations identified in this
study.
Authors: F M Impellizzeri; S M Marcora; C Castagna; T Reilly; A Sassi; F M Iaia; E Rampinini Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: G M Kline; J P Porcari; R Hintermeister; P S Freedson; A Ward; R F McCarron; J Ross; J M Rippe Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 1987-06 Impact factor: 5.411