Renée Vancraenenbroeck1, Martin R Webb1. 1. The Francis Crick Institute , Mill Hill Laboratory, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, United Kingdom.
Abstract
A fluorescent reagentless biosensor for ATP has been developed, based on malonyl-coenzyme A synthetase from Rhodopseudomonas palustris as the protein scaffold and recognition element. Two 5-iodoacetamidotetramethylrhodamines were covalently bound to this protein to provide the readout. This adduct couples ATP binding to a 3.7-fold increase in fluorescence intensity with excitation at 553 nm and emission at 575 nm. It measures ATP concentrations with micromolar sensitivity and is highly selective for ATP relative to ADP. Its ability to monitor enzymatic ATP production or depletion was demonstrated in steady-state kinetic assays in which ATP is a product or substrate, respectively.
A fluorescent reagentless biosensor for ATP has been developed, based on malonyl-coenzyme A synthetase from Rhodopseudomonas palustris as the protein scaffold and recognition element. Two 5-iodoacetamidotetramethylrhodamines were covalently bound to this protein to provide the readout. This adduct couples ATP binding to a 3.7-fold increase in fluorescence intensity with excitation at 553 nm and emission at 575 nm. It measures ATP concentrations with micromolar sensitivity and is highly selective for ATP relative to ADP. Its ability to monitor enzymatic ATP production or depletion was demonstrated in steady-state kinetic assays in which ATP is a product or substrate, respectively.
ATP is an
intracellular energy
source, involved in many cellular processes, including active transport,
cell motility, and biosynthesis. It is also an important extracellular
signaling agent in neurotransmission[1] and
inflammation.[2] ATP is generated through
several pathways such as glycolysis, the Krebs cycle, and oxidative
phosphorylation. This makes it an important assay target, and monitoring
ATP production is widely used to measure enzyme activity in biochemical
and cell-based applications.Here, the design, development,
and characterization of a fluorescent,
reagentless biosensor for ATP are described. Such biosensors for a
target molecule are single molecular species that consist minimally
of a recognition element and a reporter.[3] In this case, the recognition element is a protein that interacts
with the target analyte, ATP, namely malonyl-coenzyme A synthetase
from Rhodopseudomonas palustris (RpMatB). This protein
is coupled covalently to the reporter fluorophore(s) to give a fluorescence
change on ATP binding and thereby report on the ATP concentration
in the medium.RpMatB was chosen as the recognition element
because of several
properties, including high expression, good stability, and because
it has high affinity and selectivity for ATP. Crystal structures[4] show an ATP-dependent conformational change,
described in detail below. This was used to design RpMatB variants
with cysteine point mutations of surface residues in order to be able
to incorporate thiol-reactive fluorophores at specific locations.RpMatB belongs to the AMP-forming acyl-coenzyme A synthetase family
(PF00501)[5] and the ANL superfamily, which
contains acyl- and aryl-coenzyme A synthetases, the adenylation domains
of nonribosomal peptide synthetases, and firefly luciferase.[6] RpMatB catalyzes the conversion of malonate and
coenzyme A to malonyl-coenzyme A via a ping-pong mechanism, consuming
ATP through a malonyl-AMP intermediate. Its other products are AMP
and pyrophosphate.Two different design strategies were tried
to create a fluorescence
signal to report ATP concentration in the medium. One strategy was
based on the introduction of a single, environmentally sensitive fluorophore.
The other relied on reversible stacked dimer formation between a pair
of identical fluorophores, more particularly two tetramethylrhodamines.
Both strategies have been used previously to develop reagentless biosensors.
Examples include an inorganic phosphate biosensor based on the E. coli phosphate binding protein,[7,8] a
single-stranded DNA biosensor based on the E. coli single stranded DNA binding protein,[9] and an ADP biosensor based on the bacterial actin homologue, ParM.[10,11]The final form of the ATP biosensor is an adduct of RpMatB
and
two tetramethylrhodamines, which responds specifically to ATP with
a maximum 3.7-fold fluorescence increase. Its sensitivity lies in
the micromolar range, and its ability to monitor ATP production or
consumption was demonstrated with steady-state kinetic assays to measure
time courses, in which ATP is a product or substrate, respectively.
Results
and Discussion
Design of the Biosensor Based on RpMatB
A suitable
candidate for the protein recognition element of an ATP biosensor
was found by comparison of ligand-bound protein structures of bacterial
proteins with their corresponding ligand-free structures, as described
in the Methods. If that comparison revealed
a significant conformational change upon ligand binding, the protein
was seen as a potential candidate for biosensor development. Such
conformational changes can be harnessed to transduce ligand binding
to a fluorescence change of a fluorophore reporter, local to that
region of the protein so that it responds to the change in structural
environment. Functional parameters, affinity and selectivity for ATP,
were then considered, together with information on known mutations
that block enzymatic activity.Following this analysis, RpMatB
was chosen as the most suitable candidate for development of a reagentless
ATP biosensor. RpMatB has been crystallized in two conformations,
that is, an open form of the apoprotein and a closed form with MgATP
bound[4] (Figure ). There is a significant conformational
change upon MgATP binding,[4] and in particular,
the C-terminal “lid” domain rotates ∼20°
toward the N-terminal domain closing the active site cleft.
Figure 1
C-terminal
domain rotation upon MgATP binding and position of mutations
in RpMatB. Overlaid structures of RpMatB in the absence (orange) and
presence (blue) of ATP,[4] showing the movement
of the C-terminal (lid) domain in dark colors. The N-terminal domains
(amino acids 1–399) are in light colors, and MgATP is shown
in black. The positions of mutations are shown as spheres. For clarity,
the positions of mutations C106A and R286C are only shown in the apo
conformation.
C-terminal
domain rotation upon MgATP binding and position of mutations
in RpMatB. Overlaid structures of RpMatB in the absence (orange) and
presence (blue) of ATP,[4] showing the movement
of the C-terminal (lid) domain in dark colors. The N-terminal domains
(amino acids 1–399) are in light colors, and MgATP is shown
in black. The positions of mutations are shown as spheres. For clarity,
the positions of mutations C106A and R286C are only shown in the apo
conformation.Cysteine mutations were
introduced as sites for fluorophore labeling
onto a background of the C106A and K488A mutations in the wild-type
protein. RpMatB with the K488A active site mutation does not catalyze
the adenylation half-reaction of ATP and malonate to malonyl-AMP and
pyrophosphate.[4] It would be expected to
bind ATP but not catalyze any reaction. C106 in the wild-type protein
(Figure ) is situated
in the N-terminal domain, distant from the active site but partially
solvent accessible. Having shown that there is a low, but significant,
degree of background labeling (6%) at this position with a maleimide,
MDCC (7-diethylamino-3-((((2-maleimidyl)ethyl)amino)carbonyl)coumarin),
C106 was mutated to alanine. Several variants were designed and prepared
with either one or two cysteine residues introduced in order to label
(His6/C106A/K488A)RpMatB with either one diethylaminocoumarin
or two tetramethylrhodamines, respectively.After examination
of the ligand-bound and ligand-free RpMatB structures,
sites for diethylaminocoumarin labeling were chosen, situated around
the ligand-binding pocket on the C-terminal lobe, so that the fluorophore
might experience an environmental change when MgATP binds. These labeled
variants were tested for the fluorescence change upon ATP binding
in the presence of Mg2+ (Table S1).Sites for tetramethylrhodamine labeling were chosen so that
stacking
of the two fluorophores might be possible in the apo conformation
and that dissociation of these stacked tetramethylrhodamines could
occur on the conformational change with MgATP binding. In particular,
positions were chosen with a suitable distance (∼1.5–2.0
nm) and orientation between them in the apo conformation. In addition,
the distance and orientation between the chosen positions changed
when MgATP binds. Following labeling with tetramethylrhodamines, results
from seven different combinations are shown in Table S1.Not all the rationally designed RpMatB mutants
had an ATP-dependent
fluorescence change, probably due to a combination of several factors.
First, introducing a fluorophore might have an effect on protein flexibility
and therefore on the conformational change upon ligand binding, either
because of interaction with amino acids or because of interactions
between fluorophores. Second, while comparisons between apo and ligand-bound
structures indicate that most of the ANL superfamily members undergo
a conformational change after binding, the interdomain geometry in
apo structures is less conserved than in ligand-bound structures (Table S2). In addition, several observations
indicate that the C-terminal domain is also more flexible than the
N-terminal domain. This is based on the absence of clear C-terminal
domain structures observable in some apo structures within the ANL
superfamily and the higher average B-factor for the C-terminal domain
compared to the N-terminal domain in crystal structures of these proteins
(Table S2). So the precise geometry of
the apo RpMatB in solution may not correspond to the crystal structure.Finally, the single fluorophore approach requires changes in interaction
between fluorophore and protein on ATP binding, which are more difficult
to predict. Although the fluorophore was placed where changes in structure
occur, the fact that the fluorophore can rotate around its cysteine
means it may not fully experience those changes. In contrast, the
positioning of the two rhodamines can be modeled more accurately,
as the distance requirements for stacking are clearer for the likely
arrangement of the two-ring systems.[12,13]The
labeled variant with the largest fluorescent increase upon
MgATP-binding was (His6/C106A/R286C/Q457C/K488A)RpMatB,
labeled with two 5-iodoacetamidotetramethylrhodamines (5-IATR), hereafter
referred to as Rho-MatB. Both cysteine labeling positions are well-defined
in the apo and MgATP-bound structures, as shown in Figure . R286 is in the N-terminal
domain and Q457 in the C-terminal domain: the distances between these
two α-carbons are 1.96 nm in the apo and 2.66 nm in the MgATP-bound
conformation.
Fluorescence and Absorbance Properties of
Rho-MatB with ATP
Figure A shows
fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of Rho-MatB on the addition
of ATP. The fluorescence spectra did not change shape or position,
but the intensity increased 3.7-fold. The affinity for ATP was determined
by measuring the fluorescence at different concentrations of ATP in
a solution of Rho-MatB, and the Kd for
ATP was 6.4 μM (Figure A and Table ). This is higher than unlabeled RpMatB K488A (0.31 μM),[4] possibly due to the extra point mutations and/or
the fluorophores.
Figure 2
Fluorescence
and absorbance spectra of Rho-MatB. (A) Fluorescence
excitation and emission spectra of 1 μM Rho-MatB in 50 mM Hepes
at pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.3 mg mL–1 bovine serum albumin in the absence and the presence
of 175 μM ATP. Excitation was at 553 nm for the emission spectra.
Emission was measured at 575 nm for the excitation spectra. (B) Absorbance
spectra of 1 μM Rho-MatB in the same buffer in the absence and
presence of 119 μM ATP.
Figure 3
Nucleotide affinity to Rho-MatB. (A) Titration of ATP (circles),
ADP (up triangles), dATP (squares), ATPγS (down triangles),
and AMP-PNP (diamonds) to 0.5 μM Rho-MatB in buffer as in Figure at 20 °C. The
dissociation constants were obtained using a quadratic binding equation
(see Methods) and are listed in Table . (B) The effect of different
nucleotides on ATP binding. 1 μM Rho-MatB in the absence (circles)
and presence of 100 μM ADP, dATP, ATPγS, or AMP-PNP (symbols
as above) was titrated with ATP. The apparent dissociation constants
for ATP were obtained using the quadratic binding equation. The fitted
curves gave the following values for apparent dissociation constant
and fluorescence ratio: ADP, 7.7 ± 0.6 μM, 3.0; dATP, 9.1
± 1.2 μM, 2.3; ATPγS, 38 ± 9 μM, 1.9;
AMP-PNP, 8.2 ± 0.4 μM, 2.4. (C) Linearity of response to
ATP. 2.5 μM Rho-MatB was titrated with ATP (diamonds). To test
the effect of ADP, the fluorescence was measured in the presence of
ADP, such that the total nucleotide concentration (ADP + ATP) was
constant at 10 μM (circles), 50 μM (triangles), or 100
μM (squares).
Table 1
Fluorescence Changes and Dissociation
Constants (Kd) for Binding of ATP and
Other Nucleotides to Rho-MatBa
nucleotide
F+/F–
Kd (μM)
ATP
3.9 ± 0.2
6.4 ± 0.6
ADP
2.6 ± 0.1
428 ± 50
dATP
3.8 ± 0.2
440 ± 53
ATPγS
1.9 ± 0.1
16.2 ± 0.8
AMP-PNP
3.5 ± 0.1
253 ± 11
Both the ratio
of fluorescence
at the saturating ligand to that in the absence of ligand (F+/F–) and
the dissociation constants were obtained from fits using a quadratic
binding equation to titrations as in Figure A. The values are averages of at least three
separate measurements.
Both the ratio
of fluorescence
at the saturating ligand to that in the absence of ligand (F+/F–) and
the dissociation constants were obtained from fits using a quadratic
binding equation to titrations as in Figure A. The values are averages of at least three
separate measurements.Fluorescence
and absorbance spectra of Rho-MatB. (A) Fluorescence
excitation and emission spectra of 1 μM Rho-MatB in 50 mM Hepes
at pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.3 mg mL–1 bovine serum albumin in the absence and the presence
of 175 μM ATP. Excitation was at 553 nm for the emission spectra.
Emission was measured at 575 nm for the excitation spectra. (B) Absorbance
spectra of 1 μM Rho-MatB in the same buffer in the absence and
presence of 119 μM ATP.Nucleotide affinity to Rho-MatB. (A) Titration of ATP (circles),
ADP (up triangles), dATP (squares), ATPγS (down triangles),
and AMP-PNP (diamonds) to 0.5 μM Rho-MatB in buffer as in Figure at 20 °C. The
dissociation constants were obtained using a quadratic binding equation
(see Methods) and are listed in Table . (B) The effect of different
nucleotides on ATP binding. 1 μM Rho-MatB in the absence (circles)
and presence of 100 μM ADP, dATP, ATPγS, or AMP-PNP (symbols
as above) was titrated with ATP. The apparent dissociation constants
for ATP were obtained using the quadratic binding equation. The fitted
curves gave the following values for apparent dissociation constant
and fluorescence ratio: ADP, 7.7 ± 0.6 μM, 3.0; dATP, 9.1
± 1.2 μM, 2.3; ATPγS, 38 ± 9 μM, 1.9;
AMP-PNP, 8.2 ± 0.4 μM, 2.4. (C) Linearity of response to
ATP. 2.5 μM Rho-MatB was titrated with ATP (diamonds). To test
the effect of ADP, the fluorescence was measured in the presence of
ADP, such that the total nucleotide concentration (ADP + ATP) was
constant at 10 μM (circles), 50 μM (triangles), or 100
μM (squares).Absorbance spectra of
Rho-MatB were measured for a range of ATP
concentrations (Figure B). In the absence of nucleotide, the maximum absorbance was at 518
nm with a smaller peak at 553 nm. This is characteristic of tetramethylrhodamine
stacking, corresponding qualitatively to the absorbance spectra for
other stacked rhodamines.[14,15] Binding ATP causes
an absorbance decrease at 518 nm and an increase at 553 nm, indicating
that nucleotide binding reduces the stacking, as monomeric rhodamine
had its larger peak at ∼550 nm. The isosbestic point was at
532 nm.
Affinity of Rho-MatB for Other Nucleotides and Potential Ligands
The fluorescence of Rho-MatB responded to the addition of nucleotides
other than ATP. There was an increase in fluorescence intensity upon
the addition of ADP, dATP, ATPγS (adenosine 5′-(γ-thio)triphosphate),
or AMP-PNP (adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imido)triphosphate),
although the changes were smaller than with ATP. Their dissociation
constants were determined by measuring the fluorescence at different
concentrations of the nucleotide in a solution of Rho-MatB (Figure A and Table ) and were 428 μM, 440
μM, and 253 μM for ADP, dATP, and AMP-PNP, respectively.
So these nucleotides bound much more weakly than ATP. The dissociation
constant of ATPγS was 16.2 μM, much more similar to ATP.In contrast, AMP, GDP, and GTP did not significantly affect the
fluorescence (Table S3). Natural non-nucleotide
substrates of RpMatB, malonate, and coenzyme A, also had no effect
and their presence did not inhibit the MgATP-induced fluorescence
increase (Table S3). Presumably these do
not induce the same conformational change as MgATP binding.In most biological reactions in which ATP is a product, it is likely
to be synthesized from ADP, and consequently, ADP will be present
as a substrate in assay solutions, potentially at a much higher concentration
than the ATP product. Therefore, it is important that the biosensor
discriminates well against ADP, as described above. The effect of
ADP on the fluorescence signal change with ATP and the affinity of
ATP were also assessed. Titration curves for ATP were obtained in
the presence of 100 μM ADP: the apparent Kd for ATP was similar in the absence and presence of ADP, and
the response of the biosensor to ATP was only reduced slightly (Figure B). In addition,
the influence of ATP analogues on ATP affinity was assessed. Titration
curves for ATP were obtained in the presence of a fixed concentration
of dATP, ATPγS, or AMP-PNP. Only ATPγS influenced the
apparent Kd for ATP, increasing it ∼5-fold
(Figure B).It simplifies application of a fluorescence biosensor if the response
to concentration is approximately linear, and Figure C shows this is so for one set of conditions.
The fluorescence response to ATP was also measured in the presence
of different ADP concentrations but at constant total nucleotide concentration
to mimic ADP conversion to ATP. Although the slope decreased with
increasing ADP concentration, the fluorescence response to ATP remained
linear in the presence of ADP over the same range (Figure C).
The Influence of Solution
Conditions on the Fluorescent Properties
of Rho-MatB
The fluorescence response to ATP was measured
in different buffers over a pH range from 6.5 to 9.0 and ionic strengths
from 50 to 200 mM (Table S4). Although
the size of the fluorescence response changed with solution conditions,
there were rather small effects on the Kd for ATP. Mg2+ is required for the fluorescence change,
suggesting that MgATP is the species bound (Table S3), as might be expected because Mg2+ is a cofactor
for the enzyme. Thus, Rho-MatB can be used as a biosensor for ATP
under various pH and salt conditions in the presence of Mg2+.
Binding Kinetics
The kinetics of ATP binding were measured
by stopped-flow fluorescence in order to assess the range of rates
over which Rho-MatB is suitable for real-time measurements. ATP binding
was measured with Rho-MatB in large excess over the nucleotide. Rapid
mixing produced a monophasic, exponential increase in fluorescence
over a range of Rho-MatB concentrations (Figures A inset and S1A). The observed rate constants increased linearly with Rho-MatB concentration
(Figure A), giving
an association rate constant of 0.72 μM–1 s–1, and the intercept was 8.0 s–1,
presumably the dissociation rate constant.
Figure 4
Association and dissociation
kinetics of Rho-MatB and ATP. (A)
Association kinetics under pseudo-first-order conditions over a range
of Rho-MatB concentrations (shown as micromolar) in 10-fold excess
over ATP at 25 °C in solution conditions as in Figure using a stopped-flow apparatus.
Fluorescence time courses (inset) were normalized to 100% for the
initial intensity but offset by 2% from each other for clarity and
were well fit with a single exponential. Data at 1.3 and 2.5 μM
are averages of at least three traces. Fits are shown in Figure S1A. The observed rate constants were
plotted against Rho-MatB concentration, and linear regression gave
an association rate constant of 0.72 ± 0.03 μM–1 s–1 and an intercept of 7.95 ± 0.18 s–1. (B) Association time course under pseudo-first-order
conditions by mixing 0.25 μM Rho-MatB with a large excess of
ATP at different micromolar concentrations, as shown (inset). The
time courses showed biphasic fluorescence changes. The observed rate
constants for the fast phase (kobs; Figure S1B) were plotted against ATP concentration.
Linear regression gave an association rate constant of 1.83 ±
0.02 μM–1 s–1, and the intercept
was 8.15 ± 0.17 s–1. (C) To determine the dissociation
time course, ATP (5 μM) and Rho-MatB (0.25 μM) were premixed
to give the complex and then rapidly mixed with 25 μM or 50
μM (His6/C106A/K488A)RpMatB under conditions as above
in a stopped-flow apparatus. The dissociation was simulated (dashed
line) using the conformational selection mechanism (Figure A) and rate constants obtained from global fitting (Table S5), while assuming the association rate
constant with the unlabeled MatB trap was the same as with Rho-MatB,
but its dissociation constant was 20-fold lower to account for the
tighter binding. Note that the small deviation from experimental results
may be due to the two conformations of Rho-MatB having slightly different
fluorescence intensities: the model assumes they have the same. The
dotted line is with fluorescence of Rho-MatB1 13% less
than that of Rho-MatB2.
Association and dissociation
kinetics of Rho-MatB and ATP. (A)
Association kinetics under pseudo-first-order conditions over a range
of Rho-MatB concentrations (shown as micromolar) in 10-fold excess
over ATP at 25 °C in solution conditions as in Figure using a stopped-flow apparatus.
Fluorescence time courses (inset) were normalized to 100% for the
initial intensity but offset by 2% from each other for clarity and
were well fit with a single exponential. Data at 1.3 and 2.5 μM
are averages of at least three traces. Fits are shown in Figure S1A. The observed rate constants were
plotted against Rho-MatB concentration, and linear regression gave
an association rate constant of 0.72 ± 0.03 μM–1 s–1 and an intercept of 7.95 ± 0.18 s–1. (B) Association time course under pseudo-first-order
conditions by mixing 0.25 μM Rho-MatB with a large excess of
ATP at different micromolar concentrations, as shown (inset). The
time courses showed biphasic fluorescence changes. The observed rate
constants for the fast phase (kobs; Figure S1B) were plotted against ATP concentration.
Linear regression gave an association rate constant of 1.83 ±
0.02 μM–1 s–1, and the intercept
was 8.15 ± 0.17 s–1. (C) To determine the dissociation
time course, ATP (5 μM) and Rho-MatB (0.25 μM) were premixed
to give the complex and then rapidly mixed with 25 μM or 50
μM (His6/C106A/K488A)RpMatB under conditions as above
in a stopped-flow apparatus. The dissociation was simulated (dashed
line) using the conformational selection mechanism (Figure A) and rate constants obtained from global fitting (Table S5), while assuming the association rate
constant with the unlabeled MatB trap was the same as with Rho-MatB,
but its dissociation constant was 20-fold lower to account for the
tighter binding. Note that the small deviation from experimental results
may be due to the two conformations of Rho-MatB having slightly different
fluorescence intensities: the model assumes they have the same. The
dotted line is with fluorescence of Rho-MatB1 13% less
than that of Rho-MatB2.
Figure 5
Alternative two-step kinetic mechanisms for ATP binding to Rho-MatB.
Rho-MatB and Rho-MatB* represent two different fluorescence states
of the protein with Rho-MatB* having the higher fluorescence. (A)
Conformational selection model. In the absence of ATP, the protein
exists in two conformations, but only Rho-MatB2 can bind
ATP. It is assumed that the fluorescence change occurs only on the
second step. (B) Induced fit model. Rho-MatB binds ATP, and then the
ATP-bound protein goes to the other conformation.
Binding kinetics were also measured by rapidly mixing different
concentrations of ATP in large excess with Rho-MatB (Figures B inset, S1B and S1C). The time courses of the subsequent fluorescence
response were biphasic with the fast phase shown in Figure B (inset). The observed rate
constant for the fast phase increased linearly with ATP concentration
(Figure B), giving
a slope of 1.8 μM–1 s–1 and
an intercept of 8.2 s–1. This phase had somewhat
similar kinetics to those with excess Rho-MatB and so presumably represents
binding: the slope is the association rate constant; the intercept
is the dissociation rate constant. The equilibrium dissociation constant,
calculated from these values (4.5 μM), agrees well with the
value from equilibrium binding data (Figure A and Table ). The whole time courses fitted well to two exponentials
(Figure S1B and S1C, showing different
time scales). The observed rate constants for the slow phase were
independent of ATP concentration with an average value of 0.88 s–1.
Binding Mechanism
Two alternate
two-step binding mechanisms
(Figure ) were considered to account for observed binding kinetics,
specifically a single, fast phase with excess Rho-MatB and an additional
slow phase with excess ATP. In the first model, a pre-existing conformational
equilibrium in the apoprotein was followed by association of ATP to
one of the conformations (“conformational selection,” Figure A). The second model
involves a structural transition that follows ATP-binding (“induced
fit,” Figure B).Alternative two-step kinetic mechanisms for ATP binding to Rho-MatB.
Rho-MatB and Rho-MatB* represent two different fluorescence states
of the protein with Rho-MatB* having the higher fluorescence. (A)
Conformational selection model. In the absence of ATP, the protein
exists in two conformations, but only Rho-MatB2 can bind
ATP. It is assumed that the fluorescence change occurs only on the
second step. (B) Induced fit model. Rho-MatB binds ATP, and then the
ATP-bound protein goes to the other conformation.To distinguish between the two schemes, ATP binding kinetics
were
simulated for different sets of concentrations (Figure S2). While both models gave biphasic kinetics when
ATP was in excess, only the conformational selection model showed
a single phase with excess protein. In addition, the conformational
selection model overall gave qualitatively similar shaped curves to
the experimental data. Thus, the conformational selection model provided
a minimal mechanism for binding. The true mechanism may be more complex,
either with extra steps or fluorescence changes on both steps: the
dissociation data (below) give evidence that the latter may occur.The conformational selection model also suggests a reason for the
difference in measured association rate constants with ATP or protein
in excess. For the latter, the analysis of measurements with Rho-MatB
in excess (Figure A) used the total Rho-MatB concentration. Because only a fraction
of the protein can bind ATP directly, the true rate constant would
be higher and may be more similar to that obtained with ATP in excess.
Having concluded that the conformational selection model is the better
choice, this was tested further by global fitting the association
time courses over a range of concentrations with both ATP and Rho-MatB
in excess (FigureS3). This provides a single
set of rate constants for both steps of the mechanism, shown in Table S5. These are in reasonable agreement with
the rate constants obtained in Figure and could be tested by direct measurement of the dissociation
kinetics, described below.Evidence that Rho-MatB exists in
multiple states was obtained from
size exclusion chromatography coupled to multiangle laser light scattering
data (Figure S4). Both Rho-MatB and the
unlabeled protein in the absence of MgATP displayed single, broad
peaks with molar mass ranging from ∼60 to 80 kDa, suggesting
that there was equilibrium between different species, mainly monomer
(58 kDa) possibly with some dimer. The addition of MgATP shifted the
equilibrium toward monomer for the unlabeled protein. In contrast
for Rho-MatB, the oligomerization changed little on ATP binding, so
oligomers are unlikely to be the basis of the two conformations to
explain the kinetic data.
Dissociation Kinetics of Rho-MatB.ATP
These were measured
directly by rapidly mixing this complex with a large excess of unlabeled
protein to trap dissociated ATP (Figure C). The fluorescence decreased with time.
The dissociation was simulated using the conformational selection
model (Figure A) and
rate constants from the global fitting (Table S5). A better fit, giving the small second phase, was obtained
assuming that the two unbound conformations of Rho-MatB had slightly
different fluorescence intensities, so providing support for the model
and parameters.
Enzymatic Activity
In order to confirm
that the final
construct, Rho-MatB, lacked enzymatic activity, as expected due to
its K488A mutation, activity was measured using a coupled-enzyme assay
with consumption of NADH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide).[4] Rho-MatB as well as the unlabeled variant showed
no residual activity under the conditions tested (Figure S5). As a control, the similar Rho-MatB and RpMatB
variants, but without the K488A mutation, showed enzymatic activity
as expected.
Test Assay: Steady-State Production of ATP
by Pyruvate Kinase
The ATP biosensor was tested in a steady-state
assay in which ATP
was produced from ADP and phosphoenolpyruvate, catalyzed by pyruvate
kinase (Figure ).
This reaction was chosen as there is a coupled-enzyme assay for this
enzyme that is well established and could be used to validate the
biosensor results. The rate of ATP formation was measured at different
concentrations of phosphoenolpyruvate using Rho-MatB. The resulting
fluorescence traces (Figure A) were analyzed using a calibration curve between 0 and 5
μM ATP, obtained under similar experimental conditions (Figure A inset). Rates of
ATP formation were plotted as a function of phosphoenolpyruvate concentration
and fitted to Michaelis–Menten kinetics (Figure B), giving a Km of 103 μM and a specific activity of 0.76 μM s–1 U–1 mL.
Figure 6
The production of ATP by pyruvate kinase, monitored
by Rho-MatB.
(A) Time courses of fluorescence change upon ATP production by pyruvate
kinase at different phosphoenolpyruvate concentrations: see Methods for details. The initial rates were determined
by linear regression, using the slope obtained from a linear calibration
(inset). (B) The parameters Km (75.5 ±
3.4 μM) and Vmax (0.019 ± 0.002
μM s–1) were obtained from a curve fit to
the Michaelis–Menten model. The average Km and Vmax values (n = 5) are 103 ± 10 μM and 0.0190 ± 0.0004 μM
s–1. This gives an average specific activity of
0.76 ± 0.02 μM s–1 U–1 mL. (C) Time courses of ATP production by pyruvate kinase as monitored
by Rho-MatB in a stopped-flow apparatus: see Methods for details. Traces are offset by 0.20 μM ATP from each other
for clarity. Rates were determined by linear regression and were plotted
versus pyruvate kinase concentration (inset).
The production of ATP by pyruvate kinase, monitored
by Rho-MatB.
(A) Time courses of fluorescence change upon ATP production by pyruvate
kinase at different phosphoenolpyruvate concentrations: see Methods for details. The initial rates were determined
by linear regression, using the slope obtained from a linear calibration
(inset). (B) The parameters Km (75.5 ±
3.4 μM) and Vmax (0.019 ± 0.002
μM s–1) were obtained from a curve fit to
the Michaelis–Menten model. The average Km and Vmax values (n = 5) are 103 ± 10 μM and 0.0190 ± 0.0004 μM
s–1. This gives an average specific activity of
0.76 ± 0.02 μM s–1 U–1 mL. (C) Time courses of ATP production by pyruvate kinase as monitored
by Rho-MatB in a stopped-flow apparatus: see Methods for details. Traces are offset by 0.20 μM ATP from each other
for clarity. Rates were determined by linear regression and were plotted
versus pyruvate kinase concentration (inset).To compare, pyruvate formation was also measured using a
coupled-enzyme
assay under the same solution conditions but using a higher concentration
of pyruvate kinase, since this assay is much less sensitive. This
assay coupled the pyruvate kinase reaction to that of lactate dehydrogenase,
in which NADH reduced the pyruvate and was converted to NAD+. This assay gave a Km of 251 μM
and a specific activity of 0.65 μM s–1 U–1 mL (Figure S6). The specific
activity was similar to that obtained using Rho-MatB. Reasons why
the Km is different for the two assays
probably relate to potential product inhibition effects due to the
different extents of reaction required to perform the two assays.
Because the assay using the biosensor was more sensitive, only a low
extent of reaction was required. In the NADH-based assay, pyruvate
production was measured through lactate dehydrogenase, but with significantly
less sensitivity, so the product concentrations were much higher.In order to test the ability of Rho-MatB to assay more rapid ATP
production, measurements were done with higher concentrations of pyruvate
kinase (Figure C).
The observed rate was proportional to the amount of pyruvate kinase
added (Figure C inset),
suggesting that it can measure rates of ATP formation >1 μM
s–1.
Test Assay: Steady-State ATP Depletion by
PcrA
To demonstrate
its ability in a different type of assay, Rho-MatB was also tested
in a steady-state assay in which ATP was consumed by PcrA helicase,
coupling ATP hydrolysis to translocation on DNA (Figure ). In this case, a short oligonucleotide,
dT20, was used as this activity is well characterized and
comparable steady state data are available.[16] The rate of ATP consumption was measured at different concentrations
of dT20 using Rho-MatB. The resulting fluorescence time
courses (Figure A)
gave the rates of ATP consumption as a function of dT20 concentration (Figure B), producing a Km of 82.5 nM and a kcat of 10.5 s–1. These values
are in good agreement with data obtained using a different assay,
namely measurement of product formation.[16] Although in general depletion assays are less desirable than assays
that measure formation of a product, there may be cases where products
are not accessible for measurement or such product assays cannot be
applied due to interference.
Figure 7
The depletion of ATP by PcrA, monitored by Rho-MatB.
The measurement
was done at 10 μM ATP, using 1 μM Rho-MatB at different
concentrations of dT20. Thus, the presence of the biosensor
has little effect on the concentration of free ATP and, as the Km for ATP with PcrA is ∼3 μM, the
rates at saturating dT20 can be close to maximum. (A) Time
courses at nanomolar dT20 concentrations shown. Data were
converted from fluorescence to [ATP] using a calibration curve (inset),
with identical solution conditions at the highest concentration of
dT20, fitted to a hyperbola so that the whole concentration
range was accessible. (B) The rates obtained by linear regression
were fitted to the Michaelis–Menten model. The average Km and kcat values
(n = 3) are 82.5 ± 13.2 nM and 10.5 ± 0.6
s–1.
The depletion of ATP by PcrA, monitored by Rho-MatB.
The measurement
was done at 10 μM ATP, using 1 μM Rho-MatB at different
concentrations of dT20. Thus, the presence of the biosensor
has little effect on the concentration of free ATP and, as the Km for ATP with PcrA is ∼3 μM, the
rates at saturating dT20 can be close to maximum. (A) Time
courses at nanomolar dT20 concentrations shown. Data were
converted from fluorescence to [ATP] using a calibration curve (inset),
with identical solution conditions at the highest concentration of
dT20, fitted to a hyperbola so that the whole concentration
range was accessible. (B) The rates obtained by linear regression
were fitted to the Michaelis–Menten model. The average Km and kcat values
(n = 3) are 82.5 ± 13.2 nM and 10.5 ± 0.6
s–1.
Summary of Rho-MatB Features to Monitor ATP Production in Vitro
The biosensor is particularly aimed at
measurements of ATP formation in vitro with relatively
high time resolution. This makes it suitable for a range of real-time,
kinetic assays, which can be done under conditions that are close
to physiological pH and ionic strength. A major advantage of reagentless
biosensors is that the addition of only a single species is required
to monitor the analyte, in this case ATP, thereby minimizing the likelihood
of interference by extra added reagents. Conversely, there are less
added reagents that might be inhibited by components of the system
under study. This may be a major disadvantage when using enzyme-coupled
assays, including the luciferase–luciferin system,[17] or aptamer-based methods, such as in combination
with nanomaterials or ribozymes.[18]Rho-MatB is very specific for ATP relative to ADP. Rho-MatB has 67-fold
higher affinity for ATP than ADP. In comparison, ATeam, which is a
biosensor based on the epsilon subunit of the bacterial F0F1-ATP synthase sandwiched by a variant of the cyan fluorescent
protein and a variant of the yellow fluorescent protein, has a 30-fold
higher affinity for ATP than ADP.[19]Tetramethylrhodamine has several favorable properties as a reporter.
It usually has a high fluorescence quantum yield in a monomeric state.
Its fluorescence is unlikely to interfere with, or be affected by,
the system being studied because of excitation around 550 nm and emission
around 570 nm. In addition, tetramethylrhodamine has high photostability,
making it suitable for high intensity excitation or long exposure.
So Rho-MatB provides a robust and sensitive way to measure ATP concentrations
with high time resolution. It is suitable for assays in near physiological
solution conditions and shows high discrimination against ADP.
Methods
Materials
ATP,
ADP, 2′-dATP, ATPγS, AMP-PNP,
NADH, and phosphoenolpyruvate were from Sigma. 6-IATR (6-iodoacetamidotetramethylrhodamine),[20] MDCC, and IDCC (7-diethylamino-3-((((2-iodoacetomido)ethyl)amino)carbonyl)coumarin)[21] were a gift from Dr. John Corrie (MRC National
Institute for Medical research, London).
Selection of Protein Scaffold
All available structures
of proteins expressed in E. coli with either ATP
or an ATP analogue bound were extracted from the Protein Data Bank
(PDB).[22] To obtain the ligand-free structure,
corresponding to each of those ligand-bound structures, the sequences
of all available PDB structures of proteins expressed in E.
coli were compared with the ligand-bound sequences using
CD-HIT2D.[23] This program identified the
sequences in one database that are similar to the other database.
Sequences with >90% sequence identity were considered to be the
same
protein, and those ligand-bound and apo structures were compared using
PyMOL (Version 1.3, Schrödinger, LLC).
Preparation of RpMatB,
Labeled with Fluorescent Dyes
Plasmid design, protein expression
in E. coli, purification,
and labeling with fluorescent dyes are described in the Supporting Information.
Absorbance and Fluorescence
Measurements
Absorbance
measurements were made on a Jasco V-550 UV–vis Spectrophotometer.
Fluorescent measurements were obtained on a Cary Eclipse spectrofluorometer
(Agilent Technologies), using a 3 mm path-length quartz cuvette (Hellma),
unless otherwise mentioned. Excitation and emission slits were set
at 5 nm. Protein and nucleotide concentrations and buffer conditions
are given in the figure legends. For titrations with Rho-MatB, excitation
was at 553 nm, emission at 571 nm.Data from titrations to measure
nucleotide binding were corrected for dilution and analyzed with a
quadratic binding curve using Grafit software:[24]where P and L are the total concentrations
of protein and ligand, respectively, Kd is the dissociation constant, and Fmin and Fmax are
the fluorescence intensities of the free and ligand-bound proteins,
respectively.
Stopped-Flow Measurements
Stopped
flow experiments
were carried out using a HiTech SF-61DX2 apparatus (TgK Scientific)
with a xenon–mercury lamp and operated by Kinetic Studio software
(TgK Scientific). The excitation wavelength was 548 nm, and there
was an OG570 cutoff filter (Schott Glass) on the emission. The concentrations
in the text and figures are those in the mixing chamber. Data were
fitted to theoretical equations using the Kinetic Studio software.
KinTek Global Kinetic Explorer software (version 4.0)[25,26] was used to simulate kinetic schemes and for global fitting: see
the Supporting Information.
Steady-State
Analysis of ATP Production by Pyruvate Kinase
Steady-state
activity measurements of pyruvate kinase (rabbit muscle
from Sigma) were obtained using fluorescence or absorbance on a CLARIOstar
microplate reader (BMG Labtech). Absorbance measurements used 96-well
polystyrene microplates (black, clear flat bottom, Corning). Fluorescence
measurements used 96-well polystyrene microplates (black, F-bottom,
Greiner). Reaction mixtures (200 μL) contained 50 mM Tris·HCl
at pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 0.3 mg
mL–1 bovine serum albumin, 250 μM ADP, 2.5
μM Rho-MatB, and various phosphoenolpyruvate concentrations.
The emission at 580 nm (10 nm bandwidth) after excitation at 545 nm
(10 nm bandwidth) was recorded. A calibration curve was determined
using various concentrations of ATP added to the solution above in
the presence of 2.5 mM phosphoenolpyruvate. Reactions were started
by the addition of pyruvate kinase (0.025 U mL–1), and the change in fluorescence signal was monitored at 20 °C.
Linear regression analysis was used to determine the initial velocity.Steady-state measurements of pyruvate kinase activity were also
obtained using a stopped-flow apparatus, as above. The excitation
wavelength was 548 nm, and there was an OG570 cutoff filter on the
emission. Reaction mixtures contained 50 mM Tris·HCl at pH 7.5,
100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 0.3 mg mL–1 bovine serum albumin, 250 μM ADP, 100 μM phosphoenolpyruvate,
and 2.5 μM Rho-MatB. Reactions were started by the addition
of pyruvate kinase, and the change in fluorescence signal was monitored
at 25 °C. A calibration curve was obtained using various concentrations
of ATP added to the solution as above except without pyruvate kinase.
Steady-State Analysis of ATP Depletion by PcrA
Steady-state
activity of a DNA helicase, PcrA, purified as described,[16] was measured using fluorescence on a microplate
reader, as described above. Reaction mixtures (200 μL) contained
50 mM Tris·HCl at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mg mL–1 bovine serum albumin, 10 μM
ATP, 1.0 μM Rho-MatB, and various dT20 concentrations.
Reactions were started by the addition of PcrA helicase (2 nM), and
the change in fluorescence signal was monitored at 20 °C.
Authors: H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2000-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Mark S Dillingham; Katherine L Tibbles; Jackie L Hunter; Jason C Bell; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Martin R Webb Journal: Biophys J Date: 2008-07-03 Impact factor: 4.033