Literature DB >> 2635462

Clinical suppression and binocular rivalry suppression: the effects of stimulus strength on the depth of suppression.

K Holopigian1.   

Abstract

In observers with abnormal binocular vision (such as strabismics or anisometropes) one eye's view is often suppressed. This clinical suppression serves to eliminate binocular diplopia and confusion. Suppression may also occur in observers with normal binocular vision, when the two eyes view disparate retinal images, a phenomenon known as binocular rivalry. When the image in an eye is suppressed, it is possible to determine the amount by which that suppressed stimulus is below the visibility threshold, or the depth of suppression. In the experiments presented here, the depth of suppression in an eye was measured as the strength of the stimulus in the contralateral eye (the stimulus inducing suppression) was varied. This was done for both clinical suppressors and normal observers undergoing binocular rivalry suppression. Independent changes were made to the contrast, the luminance, and the spatial frequency of the inducing stimulus. For both clinical suppression and binocular rivalry suppression, the depth of suppression was constant, regardless of the changes to the inducing stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2635462     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90189-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Visual evoked potentials during suppression in exotropic and esotropic strabismics: strabismic suppression objectified.

Authors:  Maurits V Joosse; Danielle L Esme; Rob J Schimsheimer; Sandra A M Verspeek; Marleen H L Vermeulen; Ellen M van Minderhout
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Binocular retinal image differences influence eye-position signals for perceived visual direction.

Authors:  Deepika Sridhar; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Stimulus fractionation by interocular suppression.

Authors:  Asieh Zadbood; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Contrast Rivalry Paradigm Reveals Suppression of Monocular Input in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Bhagya Lakshmi Marella; Miriam L Conway; Catherine Suttle; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Stimulus dependence of interocular suppression.

Authors:  Wei Hau Lew; Scott B Stevenson; Daniel R Coates
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Assessment of depth perception with a comprehensive disparity defined letter test: A pilot study.

Authors:  Wei Hau Lew; Daniel R Coates
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.