| Literature DB >> 26354348 |
Min Seok Heo1, Jong Hee Shin2, Min Ji Choi1, Yeon Joon Park3, Hye Soo Lee4, Sun Hoe Koo5, Won Gil Lee6, Soo Hyun Kim1, Myung Geun Shin1, Soon Pal Suh1, Dong Wook Ryang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the species distribution and amphotericin B (AMB) susceptibility of Korean clinical Aspergillus isolates by using two Etests and the CLSI broth microdilution method.Entities:
Keywords: Amphotericin B; Aspergillus; CLSI; Etest; Identification
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26354348 PMCID: PMC4579104 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2015.35.6.602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Lab Med ISSN: 2234-3806 Impact factor: 3.464
Results of molecular identification of 136 clinical isolates of Aspergillus species from 11 hospitals in Korea
| Identification by sequence analysis:* | N (%) of isolates of | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | β-tubulin | Respiratory specimens | Ear specimens | Abscess/wound specimens | Body fluid specimens | Tissue specimens | Total |
| 43 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 56 (41.2) | ||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.5) | ||
| Total | 45 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 58 (42.6) | |
| 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 (5.1) | ||
| 7 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 (11.0) | ||
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 (7.4) | ||
| Total | 15 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 32 (23.5) | |
| 7 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 22 (16.2) | ||
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.5) | ||
| Total | 7 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 24 (17.6) | |
| 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 (11.0) | ||
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 (3.7) | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.7) | ||
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 (4.4) | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.7) | ||
| Total | 79 (58.1) | 32 (23.5) | 17 (12.5) | 6 (4.4) | 2 (1.5) | 136 (100) | |
*Species complex identification was performed by sequencing the ITS region, and species identification was performed through partial sequencing of the β-tubulin gene; †Cryptic species identifiable by β-tubulin sequencing only.
Abbreviation: ITS, internal transcribed spacer.
Distribution of amphotericin B MICs of 136 clinical isolates of Aspergillus species, determined by three methods
| Species complex | Species (N of isolates) | Test method* | N of isolates for which the AMB MIC (µg/mL) was:† | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | |||
| CLSI | 1 | 22 | 28 | 5 | |||||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 26 | 16 | 3 | ||||||
| Etest-RPG | 2 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 18 | 12 | 2 | ||||||
| CLSI | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Etest-RPG | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Total (58) | CLSI | 1 | 22 | 28 | 5 | 2 | |||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 26 | 16 | 3 | 2 | |||||
| Etest-RPG | 2 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 2 | |||||
| CLSI | 5 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||
| Etest-RPG | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
| CLSI | 7 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| Etest-RPG | 1 | 3 | 9 | 2 | |||||||||
| CLSI | 1 | 1 | 8 | ||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| Etest-RPG | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||
| Total (32) | CLSI | 1 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | |||||||
| Etest-MH | 4 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 1 | |||||||
| Etest-RPG | 1 | 3 | 7 | 15 | 5 | 1 | |||||||
| CLSI | 7 | 13 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 7 | ||||||
| Etest-RPG | 1 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 1 | ||||||||
| CLSI | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Etest-RPG | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Total (24) | CLSI | 1 | 8 | 13 | 2 | ||||||||
| Etest-MH | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 7 | ||||||
| Etest-RPG | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 1 | |||||||
| CLSI | 1 | 4 | 6 | 4 | |||||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | ||||||
| Etest-RPG | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| CLSI | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| Etest-RPG | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||
| CLSI | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Etest-RPG | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Total (6) | CLSI | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
| Etest-RPG | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||
| CLSI | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Etest-RPG | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Total | All (136) | CLSI | 1 | 1 | 17 | 33 | 48 | 27 | 9 | ||||
| Etest-MH | 1 | 1 | 11 | 15 | 43 | 28 | 21 | 6 | 8 | 2 | |||
| Etest-RPG | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 40 | 32 | 18 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 4 | ||
*CLSI, the CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution method; Etest-MH, Etest on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with glucose and methylene blue; Etest-RPG, Etest on RPMI agar supplemented with glucose; †Etest MICs were rounded up to the next highest twofold dilution value.
Abbreviations: AMB, Amphotericin B; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; Etest-MH, Etests using Mueller-Hinton agar; Etest-RPG, Etests using RPMI agar.
Agreement between amphotericin B MIC results obtained by the CLSI method and each of the Etest methods for 136 clinical isolates of Aspergillus species
| Species | Test method | MIC (µg/mL) | Essential agreement (%)* | N (%) of isolates with MIC>ECV† | Categorical agreement (%)† | % of categorical discrepancies‡ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | Very major | Major | |||||
| CLSI | 0.25-2 | 0.5 | 2 | 0 (0.0) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 0.032-4 | 1 | 3 | 91.1 | 3 (5.4) | 94.6 | 0.0 | 5.4 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.012-4 | 0.5 | 2 | 91.1 | 2 (3.6) | 96.4 | 0.0 | 3.6 | |
| CLSI | 4 | NA | NA | 2 (100) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 32 | NA | NA | 0.0 | 2 (100) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Etest-RPG | 32 | NA | NA | 0.0 | 2 (100) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Total, | CLSI | 0.25-4 | 1 | 2 | 2 (3.4) | ||||
| Etest-MH | 0.032-32 | 1 | 2 | 87.9 | 5 (8.6) | 98.3 | 0.0 | 1.7 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.012-32 | 0.75 | 2 | 87.9 | 4 (6.9) | 98.3 | 0.0 | 1.7 | |
| CLSI | 0.5-1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 (0.0) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 1-6 | 3 | 3 | 57.1 | 4 (57.1) | 42.9 | 0.0 | 57.1 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.016-2 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 85.7 | 0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| CLSI | 0.25-1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 (0.0) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 0.25-4 | 1 | 3 | 73.3 | 3 (20.0) | 80.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.016-0.75 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 93.3 | 0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| CLSI | 0.06-0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0 (0.0) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 0.25-3 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 90.0 | 1 (10.0) | 90.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.125-2 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 90.0 | 0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Total, | CLSI | 0.06-1 | 0.25 | 1 | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| Etest-MH | 0.25-6 | 1 | 3 | 75.0 | 8 (25.0) | 75.0 | 0.0 | 25.0 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.016-2 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 90.6 | 0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| CLSI | 1-4 | 2 | 4 | 2 (9.1) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 0.19-16 | 4 | 16 | 63.6 | 15 (68.2) | 40.9 | 0.0 | 59.1 | |
| Etest-RPG | 1-16 | 4 | 16 | 63.6 | 17 (77.3) | 31.8 | 0.0 | 68.2 | |
| CLSI | 0.25-1 | NA | NA | 0 (0.0) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 0.19-0.75 | NA | NA | 100.0 | 0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.25 | NA | NA | 100.0 | 0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Total, | CLSI | 0.25-4 | 2 | 2 | 2 (8.3) | ||||
| Etest-MH | 0.19-16 | 4 | 16 | 66.7 | 15 (62.5) | 45.8 | 0.0 | 54.2 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.25-32 | 4 | 16 | 66.7 | 17 (70.8) | 37.5 | 0.0 | 62.5 | |
| CLSI | 0.5-4 | 2 | 4 | 0 (0.0) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 0.25-12 | 1.5 | 8 | 86.7 | 4 (26.7) | 73.3 | 0.0 | 26.7 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.25-32 | 0.75 | 8 | 80.0 | 2 (13.3) | 86.7 | 0.0 | 13.3 | |
| CLSI | 1-2 | 2 | 2 | 0 (0.0) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 0.5-3 | 1.5 | 3 | 100.0 | 1 (20.0) | 80.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.25-0.75 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 80.0 | 0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| CLSI | 1 | NA | NA | 0 (0.0) | |||||
| Etest-MH | 3 | NA | NA | 100.0 | 1 (100) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.75 | NA | NA | 100.0 | 0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Total, | CLSI | 1-2 | 2 | 2 | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| Etest-MH | 0.5-3 | 2 | 3 | 100.0 | 2 (33.3) | 66.7 | 0.0 | 33.3 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.25-0.75 | 1 | 1 | 83.3 | 0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| CLSI | 4 | NA | NA | ||||||
| Etest-MH | 4 | NA | NA | 100.0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Etest-RPG | 3 | NA | NA | 100.0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Total (136) | CLSI | 0.06-4 | 1 | 2 | 4 (3.0) | ||||
| Etest-MH | 0.032-32 | 1 | 8 | 81.6 | 34 (25.2) | 77.8 | 0.0 | 22.2 | |
| Etest-RPG | 0.012-32 | 1 | 4 | 83.8 | 23 (17.0) | 85.9 | 0.0 | 14.1 | |
*Essential agreement (±2 log2 dilutions) between the CLSI method and each of the Etests; †The recently published ECVs (2 µg/mL for the A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. flavus, and A. versicolor complexes and 4 µg/mL for the A. terreus complex) were used for analysis of categorical agreement [813]; ‡Discrepancies were considered to be very major when an isolate classified as non-WT (above the ECV) by the CLSI method was categorized as WT by one of the Etests and major when an isolate classified as WT by the CLSI method was classified as non-WT by one of the Etests.
Abbreviations: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; Etest-MH, Etests using Mueller-Hinton agar; Etest-RPG, Etests using RPMI agar; ECV, epidemiological cutoff values; NA, not analyzed; WT, wild type.