| Literature DB >> 26351645 |
Alexander Domnich1, Roberto Gasparini1, Daniela Amicizia1, Giuseppe Boccadifuoco2, Marzia Monica Giuliani2, Donatella Panatto1.
Abstract
Development of the 4-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) has required new assays for the reliable evaluation of the expression and cross-reactivity of those specific antigen variants that are predicted to be targeted by bactericidal antibodies elicited by the vaccine in different isolates. Existing laboratory techniques, such as multilocus sequence typing, are poorly suited to this purpose, since they do not provide information on the contribution of single vaccine components and therefore cannot be applied to estimate the potential coverage of the multicomponent vaccine. The hSBA, the only correlate of protection against invasive meningococcal disease accepted thus far, cannot conveniently be used to test large number of strains. To overcome these issues, the meningococcal antigen typing system (MATS) has been specifically developed in order to predict 4CMenB coverage of individual meningococcus serogroup B strains. To date, MATS has proved advantageous for several reasons, including its ability to assess both qualitative and quantitative aspects of surface antigens of single strains in a highly reproducible, rapid, and resource-saving manner, while its shortcomings include a possible underestimation of 4CMenB coverage and the use of pooled sera to calculate the positive bactericidal threshold. This paper provides an overview of MATS development and its field application.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26351645 PMCID: PMC4553328 DOI: 10.1155/2015/353461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Res ISSN: 2314-7156 Impact factor: 4.818
Figure 14CMenB vaccine composition. Antigens NHBA and fHbp are fused with two accessory proteins, GNA1030 and GNA2091, respectively. Adapted with permission from [15].
Figure 2Schematic representation of the MATS ELISA method [15]. Bacteria from overnight cultures on agar chocolate plates are suspended in Mueller-Hinton broth and lysed with a detergent (Empigen BB 5%) added to a final volume of 1/11 and inactivated for 1 hour at 45°C in a water bath; bacterial lysates are added to three different ELISA microwell plates coated with polyclonal rabbit antibodies raised against the single vaccine components fHbp, NHBA, and NadA; the antigens are captured from the suspension to the plate. Plates are then incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with biotinylated rabbit polyclonal antibodies against each of the antigens, washed, incubated with streptavidin-HRP, and developed with the OPD substrate. Relative potency is calculated by interpolating the regression curve of the unknown sample versus that of a reference strain added to each plate. Adapted with permission from [15].
Positive bacterial threshold (PBT) values with 95% CIs for three antigens [26].
| Antigen | Estimate % | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| fHbp | 2.1 | 1.4–3.1 |
| NHBA | 29.4 | 16.9–51.1 |
| NadA | 0.9 | 0.4–1.9 |
Relative contribution (%) of all possible antigen combinations to MATS-predicted coverage in three countries [5, 30, 32, 33].
| Antigen (MATS phenotype) | England and Wales | Canada | Greece |
|---|---|---|---|
| fHbp+/NHBA−/NadA−/PorA− | 14.6 | 12.7 | 9.5 |
| fHbp−/NHBA+/NadA−/PorA− | 7.9 | 13.4 | 33.8 |
| fHbp−/NHBA−/NadA+/PorA− | — | — | 0.7 |
| fHbp−/NHBA−/NadA−/PorA+ | 0.4 | — | 0.7 |
| fHbp+/NHBA+/NadA−/PorA− | 29.9 | 25.5 | 37.1 |
| fHbp+/NHBA−/NadA+/PorA− | — | 0.6 | — |
| fHbp+/NHBA−/NadA−/PorA+ | 3.2 | 1.9 | — |
| fHbp−/NHBA+/NadA−/PorA+ | 0.9 | — | 1.3 |
| fHbp−/NHBA+/NadA+/PorA− | 0.4 | 0.6 | — |
| fHbp−/NHBA−/NadA+/PorA+ | — | — | — |
| fHbp+/NHBA+/NadA+/PorA− | 0.2 | — | — |
| fHbp+/NHBA+/NadA−/PorA+ | 15.7 | 11.5 | 6.1 |
| fHbp+/NHBA−/NadA+/PorA+ | — | — | — |
| fHbp−/NHBA+/NadA+/PorA+ | — | — | — |
| fHbp+/NHBA+/NadA+/PorA+ | — | — | — |
| fHbp−/NHBA−/NadA−/PorA− | 26.9 | 33.8 | 10.8 |