| Literature DB >> 26351297 |
Christoph Schmid1, Myriam Labopin2, Gerard Socié3, Etienne Daguindau4, Liisa Volin5, Anne Huynh6, Jean Henri Bourhis7, Noel Milpied8, Jan Cornelissen9, Patrice Chevallier10, Johan Maertens11, Pavel Jindra12, Didier Blaise13, Stig Lenhoff14, Norbert Ifrah15, Frédéric Baron16, Fabio Ciceri17, Claude Gorin18, Bipin Savani19, Sebastian Giebel20, Emmanuelle Polge21, Jordi Esteve22, Arnon Nagler23, Mohamad Mohty24.
Abstract
To analyze the influence of distinct combinations of molecular aberrations on outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML), a retrospective registry analysis was performed on 702 adults undergoing HSCT in first complete remission (CR). Patients were grouped according to presence or absence of NPM1 mutations (NPM1(mut)) and FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD). Double-negative patients were evaluated for mutations of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α gene (CEBPα). The influence of genotypes on relapse, non-relapse mortality, leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS), and a prognostic classification combining NPM1/FLT3-ITD profile and classical risk factors were calculated. Two-year OS from HSCT was 81 ± 5% in NPM1(mut)/FLT3(wt), 75 ± 3% in NPM1(wt)/FLT3(wt), 66 ± 3% in NPM1(mut)/FLT3-ITD, and 54 ± 7% in NPM1(wt)/FLT3-ITD (P = .003). Analysis of CEBPα among patients with NPM1(wt)/FLT3(wt) revealed excellent results both in patients with CEBPα(mut) and with a triple negative genotype (2-year OS: 100%/77 ± 3%). In a Cox-model of predefined variables, age, FLT3-ITD and >1 course of chemotherapy to reach CR were risk factors associated with inferior outcome, regardless of NPM1 mutational status, variations of transplant protocols, or development of graft-versus-host disease. In a prognostic risk classification, 2-year OS/LFS rates were 88 ± 3%/79 ± 4% without any, 77 ± 2%/73 ± 3% with one, and 53 ± 4%/50 ± 4 with ≥2 risk factors (P = .003/.002).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26351297 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-06-651562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113