| Literature DB >> 26350568 |
J Kolodziejczyk-Czepas1, P Nowak2, I Kowalska3, A Stochmal3.
Abstract
This study includes a comparative evaluation of antioxidant effects of plant extracts (1.5-50.0 μg/ml), derived from six clover (Trifolium) species: T. alexandrinum L., T. fragiferum L., T. hybridum L., T. incarnatum L., T. resupinatum var. majus Boiss., and T. resupinatum var. resupinatum L. Chemical profiles of the extracts contained three or four groups of (poly)phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids, clovamides, isoflavones, and other flavonoids. Antioxidant properties of Trifolium extracts were assessed as the efficacy to reduce oxidative and nitrative damage to blood platelets, exposed to 100 μM peroxynitrite-induced oxidative stress in vitro. Antioxidant actions of the examined extracts were determined by the following biomarkers of oxidative stress: thiol groups, 3-nitrotyrosine, lipid hydroperoxides, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS). Despite the significant differences in the chemical composition (the total phenolic concentrations varied between 11.30 and 52.55 mg/g of dry mass) of Trifolium extracts, we observed noticeable protective effects of almost all tested plant preparations. The T. alexandrinum extract, containing the highest concentration of phenols, was the most effective antioxidant among the tested extracts. On the other hand, the T. incarnatum extract, which contained a comparable total phenolic content (49.77 mg/g), was less efficient in prevention of tyrosine nitration and generation of TBARS. These findings indicate on the important role of individual phenolic components of the examined clover extracts for the final antioxidative effects. Antioxidative properties of the remaining extracts were noticeably weaker.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Blood platelets; Clover; Oxidative stress; Trifolium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26350568 PMCID: PMC4628623 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-015-2556-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cell Biochem ISSN: 0300-8177 Impact factor: 3.396
Contents (mg/g of dry mass) of phenolic acids, flavonoids, isoflavones, and clovamides, determined in the examined Trifolium extracts (phenolic fractions, obtained from aerial parts of the plants) [19]
| Groups of phenolic compounds |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Phenolic acids | 1.65 | 0.62 | 9.58 | 1.32 | 1.61 | 0.86 |
| Clovamides | 9.63 | – | 0.44 | – | – | – |
| Isoflavones | 18.97 | 5.50 | – | 5.10 | 11.17 | 5.21 |
| Flavonoids | 22.30 | 5.18 | 5.22 | 41.54 | 9.76 | 11.25 |
Fig. 1Protective effects of Trifolium extracts on peroxynitrite-induced damage to blood platelet proteins. The anti-nitrative action of the extracts (a) was assessed by the c-ELISA test, a semi-quantitive method, used for the measurements of 3-NT level. Oxidation of thiol groups (b) was determined with the use of Ellman’s reagent. Results are presented as mean ± SD; control platelets versus ONOO−-treated platelets (without the extracts): ### p < 0.001; ONOO−-treated platelets in the absence of the extracts versus ONOO−-treated platelets in the presence of the extracts: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; n = 6
Fig. 2Comparison of antioxidant actions of the examined Trifolium extracts on ONOO−-induced tyrosine nitration in blood platelet (a) and plasma (b) proteins. The picture represents WB patterns of 3-nitrotyrosine-containing proteins. Blood plasma and platelet proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE method (in 7.5 % gels) and transferred to Immobilon P membrane. The immunodetection of 3-NT was performed with the anti-3NT antibody, and then, the results were visualized with a chemiluminescence kit. Platelet proteins were separated under non-reducing conditions, whereas samples of plasma proteins were analyzed under reducing conditions. Approximately 10 µg of protein was applied to each lane. Molecular weight markers are indicated on the left. Representative blots of three independent experiments are shown. Lane 1 control sample, lane 2 peroxynitrite-treated samples (without the extracts), lanes 3–8 correspond to samples of platelets (a) or plasma (b) preincubated with Trifolium extracts (12.5 μg/ml) and exposed to 100 μM ONOO− (lane 3 T. alexandrinum, lane 4 T. hybridum, lane 5 T. fragiferum, lane 6 T. incarnatum, lane 7 T. resupinatum var. resupinatum, lane 8 T. resupinatum var. majus). Lane 8 represents samples preincubated with (−)-epicatechin (12.5 μg/ml) and exposed to peroxynitrite
The protective effects of phenolic fractions from six Trifolium species on ONOO−-induced oxidative damage to lipid component of blood platelets
| Extract or (−)-epicatechin (µg/ml) | Lipid hydroperoxides (nmol/2 × 108 platelets) | Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) (nmol/2 × 108 platelets) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control platelets (untreated) | 0 | 1.238 ± 0.085 | 0.484 ± 0.036 |
| Platelets exposed to ONOO− in the absence of any extract | 0 | 5.665 ± 1.472### | 0.864 ± 0.098### |
| Platelets exposed to ONOO− in the presence of the examined extracts or (−)-epicatechin | |||
|
| 1.5 | 3.659 ± 0.738*** | 0.620 ± 0.096*** |
| 12.5 | 3.465 ± 0.884*** | 0.615 ± 0.059*** | |
| 50.0 | 3.906 ± 0.666** | 0.571 ± 0.060*** | |
|
| 1.5 | 3.576 ± 0.850** | 0.776 ± 0.108 |
| 12.5 | 3.703 ± 0.677** | 0.701 ± 0.055** | |
| 50.0 | 3.499 ± 0.598** | 0.673 ± 0.078** | |
|
| 1.5 | 3.863 ± 0.606** | 0.853 ± 0.082 |
| 12.5 | 3.640 ± 0.849*** | 0.855 ± 0.088 | |
| 50.0 | 3.734 ± 0.813*** | 0.738 ± 0.093 | |
|
| 1.5 | 3.630 ± 0.686*** | 0.758 ± 0.095*** |
| 12.5 | 3.637 ± 0.954*** | 0.681 ± 0.103*** | |
| 50.0 | 3.708 ± 0.862*** | 0.620 ± 0.088*** | |
|
| 1.5 | 4.699 ± 0.742 | 0.824 ± 0.087 |
| 12.5 | 4.023 ± 0.968* | 0.802 ± 0.072 | |
| 50.0 | 3.398 ± 0.959** | 0.714 ± 0.040* | |
|
| 1.5 | 3.364 ± 0.861*** | 0.765 ± 0.090 |
| 12.5 | 3.539 ± 0.996*** | 0.679 ± 0.070*** | |
| 50.0 | 3.659 ± 0.973*** | 0.598 ± 0.094*** | |
| (−)-epicatechin | 12.5 | 2.636 ± 1.030*** | 0.611 ± 0.048*** |
The anti-lipoperoxidative actions of Trifolium extracts were estimated with the FOX-1 reagent and as the generation of TBARS. Results are presented as mean ± SD; control platelets versus ONOO−-treated platelets (without the extracts): ### p < 0.001; ONOO−-treated platelets in the absence of the extracts versus ONOO−-treated platelets in the presence of the extracts: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; n = 7