Literature DB >> 26348352

Circulating Transcript Analysis (NETest) in GEP-NETs Treated With Somatostatin Analogs Defines Therapy.

Jarosław B Ćwikła1, Lisa Bodei1, Agnieszka Kolasinska-Ćwikła1, Artur Sankowski1, Irvin M Modlin1, Mark Kidd1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Early and precise delineation of therapeutic responses are key issues in neuroendocrine neoplasm/tumor management. Imaging is currently used but exhibits limitations in sensitivity and specificity. The utility of biomarkers is unclear. objective, setting, and design: This prospective cohort study (11 mo) sought to determine whether measurements of circulating neuroendocrine tumor transcripts (NETest) predict responses to somatostatin analogs (SSAs). PATIENTS: The test set consisted of 35 SSA-treated gastroenteropancreatic-NETs (RECISTevaluated). The prospective set consisted of 28 SSA-treated Grade 1-Grade 2 GEP-NETs. INTERVENTION(S): Whole blood for transcript analysis (NETest) and plasma for Chromogranin A (CgA) (baseline), were collected every 4 weeks (prior to SSA injection). Morphologic (multidetector computed tomography/MRI) and functional imaging ((99m)Tc-[HYNIC, Tyr(3)]-Octreotide) was undertaken at entry and 6-month intervals until progression (RECIST 1.0). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Treatment response.
RESULTS: Test set: NETest (≥80%; scale, 0-100%) differentiated stable (SD) and progressive (PD) disease (P < .0001). Prospective set: 28 patients (26/28 SD) undergoing standard SSA. Grading: 12 G1, 16 G2. SSA Response: progression-free survival: 315 days: 14 (50%) SD, 14 (50%) PD. NETest: Twenty had elevated (≥80%) values; 14 developed PD; six, SD. CgA: Twelve of 28 exhibited elevated baseline values and/or subsequent >25% increase; eight developed PD; four, SD. NETest (P = .002) and grade (P = .054) were the only factors associated with treatment response. Multiple regression analysis established that the NETest could predict disease progression (P = .0002). NETest changes occurred significantly earlier (146 d prior to progression vs 56 d CgA; P < .0001; χ(2) = 19) and in more patients (100 vs 57%; P < .02).
CONCLUSIONS: NETest values (80-100%) were more accurate and occurred at a significantly earlier time point than CgA and predicted SSA treatment response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26348352     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2015-2792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  37 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Pathology of Well-Differentiated Gastro-entero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Sylvia L Asa; Stefano La Rosa; Olca Basturk; Volkan Adsay; Marianna Minnetti; Ashley B Grossman
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 2.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management.

Authors:  Zu-Yi Ma; Yuan-Feng Gong; Hong-Kai Zhuang; Zi-Xuan Zhou; Shan-Zhou Huang; Yi-Ping Zou; Bo-Wen Huang; Zhong-Hai Sun; Chuan-Zhao Zhang; Yun-Qiang Tang; Bao-Hua Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Clinical applications of (epi)genetics in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Moving towards liquid biopsies.

Authors:  Gitta Boons; Timon Vandamme; Marc Peeters; Guy Van Camp; Ken Op de Beeck
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 4.  Histopathological, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular markers of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Georgios Kyriakopoulos; Vasiliki Mavroeidi; Eleftherios Chatzellis; Gregory A Kaltsas; Krystallenia I Alexandraki
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 5.  The role of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in advanced/metastatic thoracic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Lisa Bodei; Jarosław B Ćwikla; Mark Kidd; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Molecular strategies in the management of bronchopulmonary and thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Irvin M Modlin; Mark Kidd; Pier-Luigi Filosso; Matteo Roffinella; Anna Lewczuk; Jaroslaw Cwikla; Lisa Bodei; Agnieska Kolasinska-Cwikla; Kyung-Min Chung; Margot E Tesselaar; Ignat A Drozdov
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  The Treatment Landscape and New Opportunities of Molecular Targeted Therapies in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Fabiola Amair-Pinedo; Ignacio Matos; Tamara Saurí; Jorge Hernando; Jaume Capdevila
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Assessment of NETest Clinical Utility in a U.S. Registry-Based Study.

Authors:  Eric Liu; Scott Paulson; Anthony Gulati; Jon Freudman; William Grosh; Sheldon Kafer; Prasanna C Wickremesinghe; Ronald R Salem; Lisa Bodei
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-29

Review 9.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

10.  Measurement of circulating transcripts and gene cluster analysis predicts and defines therapeutic efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  L Bodei; M Kidd; I M Modlin; S Severi; I Drozdov; S Nicolini; D J Kwekkeboom; E P Krenning; R P Baum; G Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.