Angie Mae Rodday1, Susan K Parsons1, Frederick Snyder2, Melissa A Simon3,4,5, Adana A M Llanos6,7, Victoria Warren-Mears8, Donald Dudley9, Ji-Hyun Lee10,11, Steven R Patierno12,13, Talar W Markossian14, Mechelle Sanders15, Elizabeth M Whitley16, Karen M Freund1. 1. Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. NOVA Research Company, Silver Spring, Maryland. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois. 6. Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey. 7. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 8. Northwest Tribal Epidemiology Center, Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board, Portland, Oregon. 9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. 10. Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 11. University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 12. George Washington University Cancer Institute, Washington, DC. 13. Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina. 14. Public Health Sciences, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 15. Department of Family Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 16. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient navigation may reduce cancer disparities associated with socioeconomic status (SES) and household factors. This study examined whether these factors were associated with delays in diagnostic resolution among patients with cancer screening abnormalities and whether patient navigation ameliorated these delays. METHODS: This study analyzed data from 5 of 10 centers of the National Cancer Institute's Patient Navigation Research Program, which collected SES and household data on employment, income, education, housing, marital status, and household composition. The primary outcome was the time to diagnostic resolution after a cancer screening abnormality. Separate adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were fit for each SES and household factor, and an interaction between that factor and the intervention status was included. RESULTS: Among the 3777 participants (1968 in the control arm and 1809 in the navigation intervention arm), 91% were women, and the mean age was 44 years; 43% were Hispanic, 28% were white, and 27% were African American. Within the control arm, the unemployed experienced a longer time to resolution than those employed full-time (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P = .02). Renters (HR, 0.81; P = .02) and those with other (ie, unstable) housing (HR, 0.60; P < .001) had delays in comparison with homeowners. Never married (HR, 0.70; P < .001) and previously married participants (HR, 0.85; P = .03) had a longer time to care than married participants. There were no differences in the time to diagnostic resolution with any of these variables within the navigation intervention arm. CONCLUSIONS: Delays in diagnostic resolution exist by employment, housing type, and marital status. Patient navigation eliminated these disparities in the study sample. These findings demonstrate the value of providing patient navigation to patients at high risk for delays in cancer care.
BACKGROUND:Patient navigation may reduce cancer disparities associated with socioeconomic status (SES) and household factors. This study examined whether these factors were associated with delays in diagnostic resolution among patients with cancer screening abnormalities and whether patient navigation ameliorated these delays. METHODS: This study analyzed data from 5 of 10 centers of the National Cancer Institute's Patient Navigation Research Program, which collected SES and household data on employment, income, education, housing, marital status, and household composition. The primary outcome was the time to diagnostic resolution after a cancer screening abnormality. Separate adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were fit for each SES and household factor, and an interaction between that factor and the intervention status was included. RESULTS: Among the 3777 participants (1968 in the control arm and 1809 in the navigation intervention arm), 91% were women, and the mean age was 44 years; 43% were Hispanic, 28% were white, and 27% were African American. Within the control arm, the unemployed experienced a longer time to resolution than those employed full-time (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P = .02). Renters (HR, 0.81; P = .02) and those with other (ie, unstable) housing (HR, 0.60; P < .001) had delays in comparison with homeowners. Never married (HR, 0.70; P < .001) and previously married participants (HR, 0.85; P = .03) had a longer time to care than married participants. There were no differences in the time to diagnostic resolution with any of these variables within the navigation intervention arm. CONCLUSIONS: Delays in diagnostic resolution exist by employment, housing type, and marital status. Patient navigation eliminated these disparities in the study sample. These findings demonstrate the value of providing patient navigation to patients at high risk for delays in cancer care.
Keywords:
breast neoplasms; colonic neoplasms; early detection of cancer; health care disparities; patient navigation; prostatic neoplasms; uterine cervical neoplasms
Authors: Heather J Hoffman; Nancy L LaVerda; Paul H Levine; Heather A Young; Lisa M Alexander; Steven R Patierno Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Christine E Phillips; Jessica D Rothstein; Kristine Beaver; Bonnie J Sherman; Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Tracy A Battaglia; Sharon M Bak; Timothy Heeren; Clara A Chen; Richard Kalish; Stephen Tringale; James O Taylor; Barbara Lottero; A Patrick Egan; Nisha Thakrar; Karen M Freund Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Heather J Hoffman; Nancy L LaVerda; Heather A Young; Paul H Levine; Lisa M Alexander; Rachel Brem; Larisa Caicedo; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Wayne Frederick; William Funderburk; Elmer Huerta; Sandra Swain; Steven R Patierno Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rodolphe Thuret; Maxine Sun; Lars Budaus; Firas Abdollah; Daniel Liberman; Shahrokh F Shariat; François Iborra; Jacques Guiter; Jean-Jacques Patard; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Limin X Clegg; Marsha E Reichman; Barry A Miller; Benjamin F Hankey; Gopal K Singh; Yi Dan Lin; Marc T Goodman; Charles F Lynch; Stephen M Schwartz; Vivien W Chen; Leslie Bernstein; Scarlett L Gomez; John J Graff; Charles C Lin; Norman J Johnson; Brenda K Edwards Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2008-11-12 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Karen M Freund; Jennifer S Haas; Stephenie C Lemon; Karen Burns White; Nicole Casanova; Laura S Dominici; John K Erban; Rachel A Freedman; Ted A James; Naomi Y Ko; Amy M LeClair; Beverly Moy; Susan K Parsons; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jennifer C Spencer; Cleo A Samuel; Donald L Rosenstein; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Michelle L Manning; Jean B Sellers; Stephanie B Wheeler Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Emily C Serrell; Moritz Hansen; Greg Mills; Andrew Perry; Tracy Robbins; Melanie Feinberg; Scot C Remick; Lisa Beaule; Matt Hayn; Tom Kinkead; Paul K J Han; Jesse D Sammon Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Tracy A Battaglia; Karen M Freund; Jennifer S Haas; Nicole Casanova; Sharon Bak; Howard Cabral; Rachel A Freedman; Karen Burns White; Stephenie C Lemon Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Naomi Y Ko; Frederick R Snyder; Peter C Raich; Electra D Paskett; Donald J Dudley; Ji-Hyun Lee; Paul H Levine; Karen M Freund Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 6.860