| Literature DB >> 26347400 |
Jolanda Brummelman1, Mieszko M Wilk2, Wanda G H Han1, Cécile A C M van Els3, Kingston H G Mills2.
Abstract
Current acellular pertussis vaccines have various shortcomings, which may contribute to their suboptimal efficacy and waning immunity in vaccinated populations. This calls for the development of new pertussis vaccines capable of inducing long-lived protective immunity. Immunization with whole cell pertussis vaccines and natural infection with Bordetella pertussis induce distinct and more protective immune responses when compared with immunization with acellular pertussis vaccines. Therefore, the immune responses induced with whole cell vaccine or after infection can be used as a benchmark for the development of third-generation vaccines against pertussis. Here, we review the literature on the immunology of B. pertussis infection and vaccination and discuss the lessons learned that will help in the design of improved pertussis vaccines. © FEMS 2015.Entities:
Keywords: Bordetella pertussis; T cell; Toll-like receptor agonist; immunology; vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26347400 PMCID: PMC4626578 DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftv067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathog Dis ISSN: 2049-632X Impact factor: 3.166
The putative roles of different immune cells in protective immunity to B. pertussis.
| Cell Type | Infectiona | wP | aP | Species | Function | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Th1 cell | +++ | ++ | +/– | Man | IFNγ production, macrophage activation, opsonizing Ab, prevents dissemination of Bp | (Ryan |
| +++ | + | + | Baboon | (Warfel and Merkel | ||
| +++ | ++ | +/– | Mouse | (Mills | ||
| Th2 cell | +/– | +/– | +++ | Man | No identified role in mice; unknown role in baboons and humans | (Ryan |
| – | – | +++ | Baboon | (Warfel and Merkel | ||
| – | – | +++ | Mouse | (Mills | ||
| Th17 cell | +++ | ++ | +/– | Man | IL-17 production, neutrophil recruitment and activation | (Schure |
| +++ | ++ | – | Baboon | (Warfel, Zimmerman and Merkel | ||
| +++ | ++ | +/– | Mouse | (Ross | ||
| TRM cell | +++ | ++ | – | Mouse | Sustains local cellular immunity in the respiratory tract? | Wilk and Mills, unpublished |
| TFH cell | +++ | ++ | + | Mouse | Activates Ab production and memory B cells? | Wilk, Allen and Mills, unpublished |
| TCM cell | ? | + | + | Man and Mouse | Maintains long-term immunity | (Brummelman |
| TEM cell | ? | + | ++ | Man and Mouse | Immediate effector function | (Brummelman |
| TTD cell | ? | + | ++ | Man | Waning immunity? | (de Rond |
| γδ T cell | ++ | ? | ? | Mouse | Immune regulation early in infection | (Zachariadis |
| B cell | + | ++ | +++ | Mouse | Ab production | (Mahon |
| Alveolar Mac | +++ | + | – | Mouse | Early response to infection, phagocytosis and killing of Bp | (Bernard |
| DC | +++ | ? | ? | Mouse | Activation of naive T cells in lymph nodes | (Dunne |
| NK cell | +++ | ? | ? | Mouse | Early IFNγ, prevents dissemination of Bp | (Byrne |
| Neutrophil | +++ | ++ | – | Mouse | Ab-dependent phagocytosis and killing of opsonized Bp | (Andreasen and Carbonetti |
aResponses denoted as +++, ++, +, +/–, – and ? equate to strong, medium, weak, weak/ inconsistent, undetectable responses or not tested respectively; Bp, B. pertussis, Ab, antibody.
Figure 1.Relative contribution of the cell subtypes to the induction of immune response to B. pertussis. The immune response to B. pertussis is a complex process that involves activation and recruitment of immune cells to the respiratory tract and generation of long-lasting adaptive immunity. Attachment of B. pertussis to ciliated epithelial cells and recognition by AMDCs and AMs provide a first line of immediate defense against B. pertussis infection. Secretion of cytokines and chemokines promotes recruitment of innate immune cells. Innate IL-17 together with CXCL2 (or MIP-2) secreted by activated macrophages and epithelial cells promote neutrophils recruitment. NK cells play a protective role through the secretion of IFNγ, which enhances the antimicrobial activity of macrophages as well as induces Th1 cells. Activated neutrophils and macrophages participate in an antibody-mediated phagocytosis and intracellular killing of B. pertussis. DCs migrate to the lymph nodes to present the antigen to the naive T cells. Primed T cells proliferate and differentiate into Th1 and Th17 cells that migrate to the lungs to further activate neutrophils and macrophages by production of IFNγ and IL-17, respectively. Activated B cells differentiate into plasma cells that produce B. pertussis-specific IgA or IgG2a/c antibodies (mouse). Finally, a small fraction of T and B cells become memory cells providing an effective protection after reinfection. B.p., Bordetella pertussis; Epi, epithelium; AMs, alveolar macrophages; AMDCs, airway mucosal dendritic cells; DCs, dendritic cells; Mφ, macrophages; Neu, neutrophils; Th, T helper cells; TCM, central memory T cells; TEM, effector memory T cells.
Figure 2.Models for the influence of antigen dose and the strength of TLR ligation on CD4+ T-cell differentiation. Vaccine-induced CD4+ T-cell responses can be evaluated based on effector function i.e. Th type (left panel) and memory potential i.e. memory differentiation stage (right panel). Antigen dose can affect TCR signal strength, thereby influencing Th type and memory T-cell differentiation (Gattinoni, Klebanoff and Restifo 2012; Tubo and Jenkins 2014). Inflammatory signals, such as induced by TLR ligation, during T-cell priming can also influence the Th type and memory potential of antigen-specific T cells via innate mechanisms (Joshi et al. 2007; Tubo and Jenkins 2014). The x axes depict the range of antigen dose and the y axes show the amount of TLR ligation present during vaccination or infection. In vivo, antigen and TLR ligand dose may form a gradient of local concentrations, possibly inducing an array of differentiation states. In the presence of low dose TLR ligands, low antigen dose will steer towards Th2 or Tfh cells, while an intermediate dose promotes Th1 cells and a high dose Th2 cells. Increasing TLR ligation induces Th17 and Th1 cells, yet high exposure to both TLR ligation as antigen dose will promote Th2 cells (Tubo and Jenkins 2014). In parallel, both low and high antigen dose and TLR ligation strength may also induce regulatory functions in cell populations (not shown). The memory differentiation stage is correlated with both the antigen dose and TLR ligation, meaning that the memory potential of the cells decreases when the cells are exposed to increasing TLR ligation and antigen dose (Joshi et al. 2007; Gattinoni, Klebanoff and Restifo 2012). The color gradient of memory phenotypes from light to dark indicates loss of long-term memory potential. TLR: Toll-like-receptor; TN: naïve T cell; TSCM: stem-cell memory T cell; TCM: central memory T cell; TEM: effector memory T cell; TEFF: effector T cell; TTD: terminally differentiated T cell.