Literature DB >> 26347341

Use of anti-mullerian hormone for testing ovarian reserve: a survey of 796 infertility clinics worldwide.

Kyle J Tobler1, Gon Shoham2, Mindy S Christianson3, Yulian Zhao3, Milton Leong4, Zeev Shoham5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess how anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) is used worldwide to test ovarian reserve and guide in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle management.
METHODS: An internet-based survey was sent electronically to registered IVF providers within the IVF-Worldwide.com network. This survey consisted of nine questions which assessed the clinics' use of AMH. The questionnaire was completed online through the IVF-Worldwide.com website, and quality assurance tools were used to verify that only one survey was completed per clinical IVF center. Results are reported as the proportion of IVF cycles represented by a particular answer choice.
RESULTS: Survey responses were completed from 796 globally distributed IVF clinics, representing 593,200 IVF cycles worldwide. Sixty percent of the respondent-IVF cycles reported to use AMH as a first line test, and 54 % reported it as the best test for evaluating ovarian reserve. Eighty-nine percent reported that AMH results were extremely relevant or relevant to clinical practice. However in contrast, for predicting live birth rate, 81 % reported age as the best predictor.
CONCLUSIONS: AMH is currently considered a first line test for evaluating ovarian reserve and is considered relevant to clinical practice by the majority of IVF providers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-mullerian hormone; IVF; IVF-Worldwide; Ovarian reserve; Survey

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26347341      PMCID: PMC4615913          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0562-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  32 in total

1.  A moderately elevated day 3 FSH concentration has limited predictive value, especially in younger women.

Authors:  M A Esposito; C Coutifaris; K T Barnhart
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Progesterone support in IVF: is evidence-based medicine translated to clinical practice? A worldwide web-based survey.

Authors:  Edi Vaisbuch; Milton Leong; Zeev Shoham
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Anti-Mullerian hormone: poor assay reproducibility in a large cohort of subjects suggests sample instability.

Authors:  Oybek Rustamov; Alexander Smith; Stephen A Roberts; Allen P Yates; Cheryl Fitzgerald; Monica Krishnan; Luciano G Nardo; Philip W Pemberton
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Within-laboratory and between-laboratory variability in the measurement of anti-müllerian hormone determined within an external quality assurance scheme.

Authors:  Emily Zuvela; Melanie Walls; Phillip Matson
Journal:  Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 5.  The journey from the old to the new AMH assay: how to avoid getting lost in the values.

Authors:  S M Nelson; A La Marca
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Best practices of ASRM and ESHRE: a journey through reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Luca Gianaroli; Catherine Racowsky; Joep Geraedts; Marcelle Cedars; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Roger A Lobo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Limitations and pitfalls of antimüllerian hormone measurements.

Authors:  Izaak Schipper; Jenny A Visser; Axel P Themmen; Joop S E Laven
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Mullerian inhibiting substance: a gonadal hormone with multiple functions.

Authors:  M M Lee; P K Donahoe
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 9.  Anti-Müllerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications.

Authors:  Simone L Broer; Frank J M Broekmans; Joop S E Laven; Bart C J M Fauser
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 10.  The predictive accuracy of anti-Müllerian hormone for live birth after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Stamatina Iliodromiti; Thomas W Kelsey; Olivia Wu; Richard A Anderson; Scott M Nelson
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Reproductive ovarian testing and the alphabet soup of diagnoses: DOR, POI, POF, POR, and FOR.

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Mindy S Christianson; James Stelling; William G Kearns; James H Segars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Is AMH Level, Independent of Age, a Predictor of Live Birth in IVF?

Authors:  Mohar Goswami; Dimitrios Nikolaou
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

3.  The status and comparison of ovarian reserve between fertile and infertile healthy Chinese women of reproductive age.

Authors:  Shan-Jie Zhou; Tie-Cheng Sun; Ling-Li Song; Ming Yang; Xin-Ping Sun; Li Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Lifetime changes of the oocyte pool: Contributing factors with a focus on ovulatory inflammation.

Authors:  Chan Jin Park; Ji-Eun Oh; Jianan Feng; Yoon Min Cho; Huanyu Qiao; CheMyong Ko
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2022-02-24

5.  Correlation between anti-Müllerian hormone, age, and number of oocytes: A retrospective study in a Brazilian in vitro fertilization center.

Authors:  Isadora Ferreira Kozlowski; Matheus Campos Carneiro; Vinicius Bonato da Rosa; Alessandro Schuffner
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-04-17

6.  Ovarian reserve parameters and response to controlled ovarian stimulation in infertile patients.

Authors:  Qurat Ul Aman Siddiqui; Sagheera Anjum; Fatima Zahra; Sarim Muhammad Yousuf
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  The Value of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in the Prediction of Spontaneous Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chenxi Lin; Miaomiao Jing; Wenjun Zhu; Xiaoyu Tu; Qi Chen; Xiufang Wang; Youbing Zheng; Runju Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.