Literature DB >> 26347148

Perceptions from latino and african american older adults about biological markers in research.

Gerardo Moreno, Carol M Mangione, Carlos E Meza, Ivy Kwon, Teresa Seeman, Laura Trejo, Mignon Moore, Catherine A Sarkisian.   

Abstract

Although older adult minorities face disparities in health and health care, they continue to be underrepresented in health research. Studies with biological markers of health often lack representation of older minority adults. The purpose of this study was to describe perceptions of biomarkers among ethnic minority seniors who might participate in studies of biological markers of health and to document barriers and facilitators to acceptance of biomarkers. Six focus groups (3 of Spanish-speaking Latinos and 3 of African Americans) were conducted in three community senior service organizations (two senior centers and one church). Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted to support and augment focus group data. Seventy-two community dwelling minority older adults aged 62 years and older and 10 community stakeholders participated. A community-based partnered research approach was used and two community partners participated in the analysis and interpretation of results. Standard qualitative content-analysis methods were used to identify and organize themes in domains. Focus group participants were 49% Latino and 51 o/o African American. Results included barriers: 1) mistrust, 2) fear of specimen collection/storage, 3) perceived harms, 4) competing demands, and 5) costs. Older Latinos cited issues of language as barriers to awareness and acceptance of biomarkers. African Americans had concerns over perceived harms of biomarkers. Facilitators to acceptance of biomarkers were community engagement through church and community leaders. Older Latino and African Americans identified many barriers and facilitators to the collection and storage of biomarkers. Participants identified community-partnered recommendations to overcome barriers to the acceptance, collection, and storage of biomarkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26347148      PMCID: PMC4559266          DOI: 10.18865/ed.25.3.355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Dis        ISSN: 1049-510X            Impact factor:   1.847


  21 in total

1.  Biomarkers of Psychological Stress in Health Disparities Research.

Authors:  Zora Djuric; Chloe E Bird; Alice Furumoto-Dawson; Garth H Rauscher; Mack T Ruffin; Raymond P Stowe; Katherine L Tucker; Christopher M Masi
Journal:  Open Biomark J       Date:  2008-01-01

Review 2.  Knowledge and access to information on recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  J G Ford; M W Howerton; S Bolen; T L Gary; G Y Lai; J Tilburt; M C Gibbons; C Baffi; R F Wilson; C J Feuerstein; P Tanpitukpongse; N R Powe; E B Bass
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ)       Date:  2005-06

3.  Conquering cancer disparities: new opportunities for cancer epidemiology, biomarker, and prevention research.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean G Ford; Mollie W Howerton; Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Shari Bolen; M Chris Gibbons; Jon Tilburt; Charles Baffi; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Renee F Wilson; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Recruitment and retention of minority participants in the health and retirement study.

Authors:  Mary B Ofstedal; David R Weir
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2011-06

6.  Views of biobanking research among Alaska native people: the role of community context.

Authors:  Vanessa Hiratsuka; Jennifer Brown; Denise Dillard
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system.

Authors:  G M Swanson; A J Ward
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Ethnic differences in C-reactive protein concentrations.

Authors:  Alyson Kelley-Hedgepeth; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Alicia Colvin; Karen A Matthews; Janet Johnston; Maryfran R Sowers; Barbara Sternfeld; Richard C Pasternak; Claudia U Chae
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 9.  Inflammatory biomarkers in African Americans: a potential link to accelerated atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Michelle A Albert; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Rev Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.930

Review 10.  Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differentials of C-reactive protein levels: a systematic review of population-based studies.

Authors:  Aydin Nazmi; Cesar G Victora
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  3 in total

1.  Attitudes Toward Genomic Testing and Prostate Cancer Research Among Black Men.

Authors:  Charles R Rogers; Michael J Rovito; Musse Hussein; Ogechi Jessica Obidike; Rebekah Pratt; Mark Alexander; Jerica M Berge; Marc Dall'Era; Jeffrey W Nix; Christopher Warlick
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.

Authors:  M Smirnoff; I Wilets; D F Ragin; R Adams; J Holohan; R Rhodes; G Winkel; E M Ricci; C Clesca; L D Richardson
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2018-02-16

3.  Earning the Trust of African American Communities to Increase Representation in Dementia Research.

Authors:  Elena Portacolone; Nynikka R Palmer; Peter Lichtenberg; Catherine M Waters; Carl V Hill; Sahru Keiser; Leah Vest; Marsha Maloof; Thi Tran; Paula Martinez; Javier Guerrero; Julene K Johnson
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 1.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.