| Literature DB >> 26347114 |
H Boer1, J H Proost2, J Nuver1, S Bunskoek1, J Q Gietema1, B M Geubels1, R Altena1, N Zwart1, S F Oosting1, J M Vonk3, J D Lefrandt4, D R A Uges2, C Meijer1, E G E de Vries1, J A Gietema5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The success of cisplatin-based (Platinol, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New York, NY, USA) chemotherapy for testicular cancer comes at the price of long-term and late effects related to healthy tissue damage. We assessed and modelled serum platinum (Pt) decay after chemotherapy and determined relationships between long-term circulating Pt levels and known late effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 99 testicular cancer survivors, treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, serum and 24-h urine samples were collected during follow-up (1-13 years after treatment). To build a population pharmacokinetic model, measured Pt data were simultaneously analysed, together with cisplatin dose, age, weight and height using the NONMEM software. Based on this model, area under the curve between 1 and 3 years after treatment (Pt AUC1-3 years) was calculated for each patient. Predicted long-term Pt exposure was related to renal function and to late effects of treatment assessed median 9 (3-15) years after chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: BEP; germ cell cancer; long-term toxicity; nephrotoxicity; platinum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26347114 PMCID: PMC4621032 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Oncol ISSN: 0923-7534 Impact factor: 32.976
Demographic, diagnostic, treatment-related and follow-up characteristics of study participants
| Study population characteristics | %/range | |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort size | 96 | |
| Age at start chemotherapy (years) | 29 | 17–53 |
| Age at follow-up (years) | 39 | 23–64 |
| Year of treatment | 1988–2000 | |
| Disease stage (Royal Marsden Classification) | ||
| II | 51 | 53 |
| III | 5 | 5 |
| IV | 40 | 42 |
| IGCCCG risk group | ||
| Good | 54 | 56 |
| Intermediate | 33 | 34 |
| Poor | 9 | 9 |
| Chemotherapeutic regimen | ||
| 4× BEP | 32 | 33 |
| 4× EP | 8 | 8 |
| 3× BEP/1× EP | 50 | 52 |
| Other cisplatin-based regimen | 6 | 6 |
| Cumulative cisplatin dose (mg) | 809 | 554–1713 |
| Cumulative cisplatin dose (mg/m2) | 400 | 275–800 |
| Prevalence of late effects of treatment | a | |
| Persisting paraesthesia | 33 | 35 |
| Raynaud's phenomenon | 23 | 25 |
| Hypogonadism (T < 10 nmol/l or LH >10 U/l or suppletion) | 19 | 20 |
| Hypercholesterolaemia (≥6.5 mmol/l or statin) | 23 | 25 |
| Increased LDL-cholesterol (≥4.1 mmol/l or statin) | 37 | 40 |
| Increased blood pressure (≥130/85 mmHg or antihypertensive) | 63 | 68 |
BEP: bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin; EP: etoposide and cisplatin; IGCCCG: International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group Classification; T: testosterone; LH: luteinizing hormone, LDL: low-density lipoprotein.
aPercentages for individual characteristics calculated on total number of participants on whom information was available.
Figure 1.Circulating serum platinum measurements (n = 240) and predicted curves 1–13 years after chemotherapy according to the population pharmacokinetic model. Predicted maximum and minimum are curves of the highest and lowest predicted decay based on the model.
Figure 2.Platinum area under the curve (AUC1–3 years) after chemotherapy in different groups based on renal function and cumulative administered cisplatin dose.