J Lauritsen1, M S Mortensen2, M G G Kier2, I J Christensen3, M Agerbaek4, R Gupta5, G Daugaard2. 1. Department of Oncology 5073, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen. Electronic address: jakob.lauritsen@regionh.dk. 2. Department of Oncology 5073, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen. 3. Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet and Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Biocenter, Copenhagen. 4. Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus. 5. Department of Systems Biology, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment with bleomycin-etoposide-cisplatin (BEP) impairs renal function and increases the risk of late cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death. We investigated the influence of BEP on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and assessed the importance of GFR changes on CVD and death in a large cohort of germ-cell cancer survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BEP-treated patients (N = 1206) were identified in the Danish DaTeCa database, and merged with national registers to identify late toxicity. GFR were measured (51Cr-EDTA clearance) before and after treatment and at 1, 3 and 5-year follow-up. The influence of BEP on GFR was evaluated with a linear mixed model. Risk factors for late toxicity were identified by a landmark analysis adjusting for covariates. The cohort was compared with the background population with standardized hospitalization/mortality rates. RESULTS: GFR changed (ΔGFR) -11.3%, -15.4% and -25.9% after three, four and five+ cycles of BEP. For patients with impaired renal function before treatment the changes were 4.3%, 0.0% and -12.8%, respectively. During follow-up a significant rebound of GFR was documented. Compared with the background population, all patients, irrespective of renal function, had an increased risk of CVD and death. This risk depended on chronic kidney disease stage before treatment but not after treatment. ΔGFR had no influence on risk of late toxicity [death: hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, P = 0.50; CVD: HR 0.97, P = 0.61]. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function after BEP is closely related to number of cycles, but the changes in GFR are partly reversible and have no impact on risk of CVD or death.
BACKGROUND: Treatment with bleomycin-etoposide-cisplatin (BEP) impairs renal function and increases the risk of late cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death. We investigated the influence of BEP on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and assessed the importance of GFR changes on CVD and death in a large cohort of germ-cell cancer survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BEP-treated patients (N = 1206) were identified in the Danish DaTeCa database, and merged with national registers to identify late toxicity. GFR were measured (51Cr-EDTA clearance) before and after treatment and at 1, 3 and 5-year follow-up. The influence of BEP on GFR was evaluated with a linear mixed model. Risk factors for late toxicity were identified by a landmark analysis adjusting for covariates. The cohort was compared with the background population with standardized hospitalization/mortality rates. RESULTS: GFR changed (ΔGFR) -11.3%, -15.4% and -25.9% after three, four and five+ cycles of BEP. For patients with impaired renal function before treatment the changes were 4.3%, 0.0% and -12.8%, respectively. During follow-up a significant rebound of GFR was documented. Compared with the background population, all patients, irrespective of renal function, had an increased risk of CVD and death. This risk depended on chronic kidney disease stage before treatment but not after treatment. ΔGFR had no influence on risk of late toxicity [death: hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, P = 0.50; CVD: HR 0.97, P = 0.61]. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function after BEP is closely related to number of cycles, but the changes in GFR are partly reversible and have no impact on risk of CVD or death.
Authors: Noa Shani Shrem; Lori Wood; Robert J Hamilton; Kopika Kuhathaas; Piotr Czaykowski; Matthew Roberts; Andrew Matthew; Jason P Izard; Peter Chung; Lucia Nappi; Jennifer Jones; Denis Soulières; Armen Aprikian; Nicholas Power; Christina Canil Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2022-08 Impact factor: 2.052
Authors: Karin Oechsle; Michael Hartmann; Anja Mehnert; Christoph Oing; Carsten Bokemeyer; Sigrun Vehling Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Sara L Garcia; Jakob Lauritsen; Zeyu Zhang; Mikkel Bandak; Marlene D Dalgaard; Rikke L Nielsen; Gedske Daugaard; Ramneek Gupta Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2020-04-23
Authors: H Boer; J H Proost; J Nuver; S Bunskoek; J Q Gietema; B M Geubels; R Altena; N Zwart; S F Oosting; J M Vonk; J D Lefrandt; D R A Uges; C Meijer; E G E de Vries; J A Gietema Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 32.976