Lucy Frankel1, Claudia Sanmartin2, Gillian Hawker1, Carolyn De Coster2, Michael Dunbar3, Eric Bohm4, Tom Noseworthy2. 1. Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. 4. Department of Surgery, Concordia Joint Replacement Group, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) rates rise, there is need to ensure appropriate use. Our objective was to elucidate surgeons' perspectives on appropriateness for TJA. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in a sample of orthopaedic surgeons that perform TJA in three Canadian Provinces. Surgeons were asked to discuss their criteria for TJA appropriateness for osteoarthritis; potential value of a decision-support tool to select appropriate candidates; and the role of other stakeholders in assessing appropriateness. RESULTS: Of 17 surgeons approached for participation, 14 completed interviews (12 males; 7 aged <50 years; 5 academic; 8 in urban practices). Surgeons agreed that pain and pain impact on patients' quality of life and function were the key criteria to assess appropriateness for TJA, but that these concepts were difficult to assess and not always congruent with structural changes on joint radiography. Some used a wider range of criteria, including their assessments of patient expectations, ability to cope and readiness for surgery. While patient age was not identified as a criterion itself, surgeons did acknowledge that appropriateness criteria may differ for younger versus older patients. Most agreed that a decision-support tool would help ensure that all elements of appropriateness are assessed in a standardized manner, albeit the ultimate decision to offer surgery must be left to the discretion of surgeons, within the context of the doctor-patient relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons recognized the need for a tool to support decision making for TJA, particularly in the context of increasing surgical demand in younger patients with less severe arthritis. The work to develop and test such a decision-support tool is underway.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) rates rise, there is need to ensure appropriate use. Our objective was to elucidate surgeons' perspectives on appropriateness for TJA. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in a sample of orthopaedic surgeons that perform TJA in three Canadian Provinces. Surgeons were asked to discuss their criteria for TJA appropriateness for osteoarthritis; potential value of a decision-support tool to select appropriate candidates; and the role of other stakeholders in assessing appropriateness. RESULTS: Of 17 surgeons approached for participation, 14 completed interviews (12 males; 7 aged <50 years; 5 academic; 8 in urban practices). Surgeons agreed that pain and pain impact on patients' quality of life and function were the key criteria to assess appropriateness for TJA, but that these concepts were difficult to assess and not always congruent with structural changes on joint radiography. Some used a wider range of criteria, including their assessments of patient expectations, ability to cope and readiness for surgery. While patient age was not identified as a criterion itself, surgeons did acknowledge that appropriateness criteria may differ for younger versus older patients. Most agreed that a decision-support tool would help ensure that all elements of appropriateness are assessed in a standardized manner, albeit the ultimate decision to offer surgery must be left to the discretion of surgeons, within the context of the doctor-patient relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons recognized the need for a tool to support decision making for TJA, particularly in the context of increasing surgical demand in younger patients with less severe arthritis. The work to develop and test such a decision-support tool is underway.
Authors: Barbara L Conner-Spady; Eric Bohm; Lynda Loucks; Michael J Dunbar; Deborah A Marshall; Tom W Noseworthy Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Samantha Bunzli; Elizabeth Nelson; Anthony Scott; Simon French; Peter Choong; Michelle Dowsey Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-11-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Antonio Escobar; Amaia Bilbao; Maria L Bertrand; Jesús Moreta; Miquel A Froufe; Jordi Colomina; Olga Martınez-Cruz; Robert A Perera; Daniel L Riddle Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 2.359
Authors: Femke Atsma; Olivier Molenkamp; Heinse Bouma; Stefan B Bolder; A Stef Groenewoud; Gert P Westert Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 2.038