Literature DB >> 29806819

Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess a qualitative study.

Lucas Gallo1, Jessica Murphy1, Luis H Braga1, Forough Farrokhyar1, Achilleas Thoma1.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Qualitative research contributes to the medical literature through the observation, description and interpretation of theories about social interactions and individual experiences as they occur in their natural setting. This type of research has the potential to enhance the understanding of surgeons' and patients' preferences, attitudes and beliefs, as well as assess how these may change with time. To date, there is no widely accepted standard for the methodological assessment of qualitative research. Despite ongoing debate, this article seeks to familiarize surgeons with the basic techniques for the critical appraisal of qualitative studies in the surgical literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29806819      PMCID: PMC5973909          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.013117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  20 in total

1.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Qualitative research: the "what," "why," "who," and "how"!

Authors:  Brigitte S Cypress
Journal:  Dimens Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

3.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Critically appraising qualitative research.

Authors:  Ayelet Kuper; Lorelei Lingard; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-08-07

5.  Qualitative health research : one quarter of a century.

Authors:  Janice M Morse
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-01

6.  Prioritizing qualitative research in surgery: A synthesis and analysis of publication trends.

Authors:  Allysha C Maragh-Bass; Jessica R Appelson; Navin R Changoor; W Austin Davis; Adil H Haider; Megan A Morris
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 7.  Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies.

Authors:  N C Elder; W L Miller
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Salespeople in the Surgical Suite: Relationships between Surgeons and Medical Device Representatives.

Authors:  Bonnie O'Connor; Fran Pollner; Adriane Fugh-Berman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Return to work after knee replacement: a qualitative study of patient experiences.

Authors:  Michelle Bardgett; Joanne Lally; Ajay Malviya; David Deehan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  3 in total

1.  How novice and expert anaesthetists understand expertise in anaesthesia: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Michael St Pierre; James M Nyce
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Acromegaly and the information gap: patient perceptions of the journey from primary to tertiary care.

Authors:  Hei Yi Vivian Pak; Andrew Lansdown; Peter Taylor; Dafydd Aled Rees; John Stephen Davies; Caroline Hayhurst
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.335

3.  Patient perspectives on endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Nadim Saydy; Sami Pierre Moubayed; Martin Desrosiers
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-06-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.