Literature DB >> 26346961

Do "Myths" of low back pain exist among Irish population? A cross-sectional study.

Sudarshan Munigangaiah1, Navya Basavaraju2, Dima Y Jadaan3, Aiden T Devitt4, John P McCabe4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain remains major public health problem in the Western industrialized world. The known prevalence of low back pain in Ireland is approximately 13 %. It is one of the leading causes of sickness compensation and disability pension in our justification. We hypothesized that there is a widespread misconception about the perception of low back pain among the Irish population. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the "Myths" of low back pain existed among the Irish population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study in the Republic of Ireland from April 2013 to August 2013. The Irish population who visited Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland, was contacted randomly at point of entry to the hospital. During the survey, the authors obtained verbal consent before handing the questionnaire, which contained the Deyo's seven myths. The responders were asked to mark their response in a three-point scale (agree, unsure, disagree) to the seven statements.
RESULTS: Out of 500 responders, 59 (11.8 %) people answered none of the questions correctly. Fifty-six (11.2 %) answered one question correctly, 106 (21.2 %) answered two questions correctly, 85 (17 %) people disagreed with three myths, 88 (17.6 %) disagreed with four myths, 55 (11 %) people answered five questions correctly, and 34 (6.8 %) answered six questions correctly. Therefore, only 17 (3.4 %) people disagreed with all the seven myths.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this cross-sectional study showed that myths of low back pain widely exist among Irish population studied . The level of education played an important role. The findings from this study suggest that public health information regarding low back pain is inadequate and has not affected attitudes to low back pain in an Irish population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back pain; Deyo’s myths; Irish population; Low back pain

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26346961     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1698-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  23 in total

1.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Fear-avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing: occurrence and risk factor in back pain and ADL in the general population.

Authors:  Nina Buer; Steven J Linton
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain a qualitative study.

Authors:  H Schers; M Wensing; Z Huijsmans; M van Tulder; R Grol
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Prevalence and consequences of low back problems in The Netherlands, working vs non-working population, the MORGEN-Study. Monitoring Project on Risk Factors for Chronic Disease.

Authors:  H S Picavet; J S Schouten; H A Smit
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  Are fear-avoidance beliefs related to the inception of an episode of back pain? A prospective study.

Authors:  S J Linton; N Buer; J Vlaeyen; A L Hellsing
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2000-11

6.  Low back pain, disability and back pain myths in a community sample: prevalence and interrelationships.

Authors:  Liesbet Goubert; Geert Crombez; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.931

7.  A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  [How is the general practitioner managing the back pain?].

Authors:  Erik L Werner; Even Laerum; Camilla Ihlebaek
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2002-08-10

9.  Are the "myths" of low back pain alive in the general Norwegian population?

Authors:  Camilla Ihlebaek; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Factors affecting general practitioners' decisions about plain radiography for back pain: implications for classification of guideline barriers--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  It's safe to move! A protocol for a randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of a video designed to increase people's confidence becoming more active despite back pain.

Authors:  Edel O'Hagan; Adrian C Traeger; Siobhan M Schabrun; Sean O'Neill; Benedict Martin Wand; Aidan Cashin; Christopher Michael Williams; Ian A Harris; James H McAuley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.006

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.