| Literature DB >> 26346937 |
Safaa Yehia Eid1, Mahmoud Zaki El-Readi2, Mohamed Lotfy Ashour3, Michael Wink4.
Abstract
Resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapy is controlled by the decrease of intracellular drug accumulation, increase of detoxification, and diminished propensity of cancer cells to undergo apoptosis. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) membrane transporters with intracellular metabolic enzymes contribute to the complex and unresolved phenomenon of multidrug resistance (MDR). Natural products as alternative medicine have great potential to discover new MDR inhibitors with diverse modes of action. In this study, we characterized several extracts of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) plants (N = 16) for their interaction with ABC transporters, cytochrome P3A4 (CYP3A4), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activities and their cytotoxic effect on different cancer cell lines. Fallopia japonica (FJ) (Polygonaceae) shows potent inhibitory effect on CYP3A4 P-glycoprotein activity about 1.8-fold when compared to verapamil as positive control. FJ shows significant inhibitory effect (39.81%) compared with the known inhibitor ketoconazole and 100 μg/mL inhibited GST activity to 14 μmol/min/mL. FJ shows moderate cytotoxicity in human Caco-2, HepG-2, and HeLa cell lines; IC50 values were 630.98, 198.80, and 317.37 µg/mL, respectively. LC-ESI-MS were used to identify and quantify the most abundant compounds, emodin, polydatin, and resveratrol, in the most active extract of FJ. Here, we present the prospect of using Fallopia japonica as natural products to modulate the function of ABC drug transporters. We are conducting future study to evaluate the ability of the major active secondary metabolites of Fallopia japonica to modulate MDR and their impact in case of failure of chemotherapy.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26346937 PMCID: PMC4545274 DOI: 10.1155/2015/868424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Cytotoxicity (IC50 values µg/mL) of methanolic extracts from TCM plants in Caco-2, HepG-2, and HeLa cells.
| Plant Latin name (family) | IC50 values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Caco-2 | HepG-2 | HeLa | |
|
| 1393.74 ± 120.34 | 308.66 ± 39.75 | 414.29 ± 72.72 |
|
| 1520.01 ± 123.43 | 1074.56 ± 110.70 | 670.94 ± 40.63 |
|
| 965.23 ± 90.87 | 880.86 ± 61.35 | 355.75 ± 16.81 |
|
| 592.62 ± 15.56 | 410.52 ± 40.19 | 98.85 ± 9.02 |
|
| 2590.48 ± 290.02 | 2167.54 ± 199.84 | 500.50 ± 57.65 |
|
| 998.54 ± 47.89 | 469.31 ± 17.03 | 324.39 ± 34.68 |
|
| 1439.96 ± 66.47 | 368.54 ± 30.09 | 86.11 ± 3.21 |
|
| 1170.12 ± 40.11 | 997.45 ± 56.89 | 375.06 ± 50.61 |
|
| 1584.14 ± 38.08 | 1102.23 ± 76.39 | 469.06 ± 54.73 |
|
| 53.87 ± 5.67 | 48.31 ± 4.43 | 35.04 ± 6.45 |
|
| 1488.25 ± 68.12 | 413.30 ± 93.83 | 159.41 ± 8.56 |
|
| 630.98 ± 40.21 | 198.80 ± 16.80 | 317.37 ± 22.27 |
|
| 1380.69 ± 60.77 | 169.49 ± 17.82 | 158.53 ± 13.25 |
|
| 2420.03 ± 210.54 | 980.34 ± 89.76 | 368.20 ± 19.88 |
|
| 1310.34 ± 31.21 | 1123.65 ± 52.43 | 1213.42 ± 21.47 |
|
| 520.23 ± 70.43 | 345.23 ± 34.23 | 297.53 ± 19.99 |
Figure 1Correlation of cytotoxic effects (IC50 values) of TCM plants between different cell lines; cytotoxicity in Caco-2 correlated with HepG-2 (P < 0.05) (a) and with HeLa (P < 0.01) (b) and HeLa highly significantly correlated with HepG-2 (P < 0.001) (c).
Effect of TCM drugs (100 µg/mL) on activities of ABC transporters, GST, and CYP3A4.
| Plant (family) | Metabolic activity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MDR | GST | CYP3A4 | |
|
| 1.27 ± 0.13 | 23.46 ± 3.34 | 56.94 ± 4.35 |
|
| 8.84 ± 0.97 | 31.81 ± 3.54 | 16.38 ± 3.08 |
|
| 9.83 ± 0.89 | 22.86 ± 1.54 | 46.18 ± 4.99 |
|
| 0.28 ± 0.03 | 9.54 ± 1.02 | 2.71 ± 1.53 |
|
| 19.29 ± 4.32 | 15.70 ± 1.72 | 22.62 ± 3.62 |
|
| 171.24 ± 18.54 | 10.93 ± 1.32 | 10.22 ± 3.12 |
|
| 2.99 ± 0.35 | 10.14 ± 1.39 | 48.30 ± 4.70 |
|
| 8.96 ± 1.00 | 12.92 ± 1.81 | 1.19 ± 0.37 |
|
| 1.21 ± 0.15 | 13.91 ± 1.96 | 24.91 ± 0.54 |
|
| 15.41 ± 2.01 | 18.88 ± 2.11 | 2.92 ± 1.18 |
|
| 6.32 ± 0.82 | 27.43 ± 1.32 | 0.61 ± 0.04 |
|
| 179.94 ± 18.34 | 14.11 ± 1.23 | 39.81 ± 4.68 |
|
| 35.82 ± 4.65 | 19.88 ± 3.43 | 59.96 ± 3.52 |
|
| 134.38 ± 15.9 | 7.35 ± 0.67 | 8.21 ± 3.14 |
|
| 43.60 ± 5.76 | 9.94 ± 1.9 | 47.41 ± 1.07 |
|
| 65.77 ± 6.89 | 15.31 ± 2.85 | 24.97 ± 2.75 |
MDR inhibition calculated as % compared to verapamil as positive control (100%).
Data are means ± S.D. from three independent experiments.
Figure 2HPLC profile of F. japonica methanolic extract.
Identification of secondary metabolites in methanol extract of F. japonica by LC-ESI/MS.
| Peak | RT | [M−H]−
| Other ions | Compound | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6 | 290 | — | Unknown | 14.2 |
| 2 | 8.8 | 389 | — | Polydatin | 22.4 |
| 3 | 12 | 541 | — | Polydatin gallate | 3 |
| 4 | 14.4 | 431 | — | Apigenin-7-glucoside | 2 |
| 5 | 15.7 | 227 | — | Resveratrol | 2.55 |
| 6 | 18.5 | 407 | 245[M − H-glu]− | Torachrysone-8-O- | 4.23 |
| 7 | 19.7 | 431 | — | Emodin-8- | 11.1 |
| 8 | 24.2 | 445 | 283[M − H-glu]− | Physcion-8- | 2.9 |
| 9 | 26.3 | 285 | — | Hydroxyemodin | 1.6 |
| 10 | 35.2 | 283 | — | Rhein | 5.2 |
| 11 | 44.8 | 269 | — | Emodin | 29.6 |
| 12 | 48.3 | 283 | — | Physcion | 1.2 |