Itsuro Kazama1. 1. Department of Physiology I, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.
Abstract
To mimic ischemic heart disease in humans, several animal models have been created, mainly in rodents by surgically ligating their coronary arteries. In the present study, by simply inducing burn injuries on the bullfrog heart, we reproduced abnormal ST segment changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG), mimicking those observed in ischemic heart disease, such as acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris. The "currents of injury" created by a voltage gradient between the intact and damaged areas of the myocardium, negatively deflected the ECG vector during the diastolic phase, making the ST segment appear elevated during the systolic phase. This frog model of heart injury would be suitable to explain the mechanisms of ST segment changes observed in ischemic heart disease.
To mimic ischemic heart disease in humans, several animal models have been created, mainly in rodents by surgically ligating their coronary arteries. In the present study, by simply inducing burn injuries on the bullfrog heart, we reproduced abnormal ST segment changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG), mimicking those observed in ischemic heart disease, such as acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris. The "currents of injury" created by a voltage gradient between the intact and damaged areas of the myocardium, negatively deflected the ECG vector during the diastolic phase, making the ST segment appear elevated during the systolic phase. This frog model of heart injury would be suitable to explain the mechanisms of ST segment changes observed in ischemic heart disease.
Ischemic heart disease, including myocardial infarction and angina pectoris, is a leading cause of morbidity and
mortality in the world [8]. The large loss of cardiomyocytes induced by
ischemia often leads to an impairment of the cardiac contractility, loss of pump function and subsequent onset of
heart failure [11]. The disease also provokes serious ventricular
tachyarrhythmia, occasionally causing sudden cardiac death [1]. To mimic
myocardial infarction in humans, several animal models have been created in rodents (mice and rats) or other
mammals (rabbits, dogs and pigs) [16]. The procedure includes surgical
ligation, cauterization or cryo-injury of the left anterior descending coronary arteries (LAD) to induce
myocardial ischemic damage [9, 12,
16]. However, due to the increased cost of such animals and specific
instruments required for the procedure, including respiratory machines and anesthesia apparatuses, the use of
these models was often limited to highly specialized laboratories [14].
Using the isolated hearts from bullfrogs, previous studies revealed the electrophysiological properties of cardiac
muscles together with their mechanisms [2, 15]. In these studies, the electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded from the frog heart showed an almost
identical pattern to that of humans or rodents [15], indicating its
usefulness as a mimic of the human heart. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to establish a simple model of
myocardial damage in frog hearts. Here, by simply inducing burn injuries on the bullfrog heart, we reproduced ECG
abnormalities representing those observed in ischemic heart disease, such as acute myocardial infarction and
angina pectoris. Using this model, we will also explain the mechanisms of ST segment changes observed in humanischemic heart diseases.Adult male bullfrogs weighing 400–500 g (n=22), purchased from Mr. Ohuchi Kazuo, were initially
anesthetized by diethyl-ether, which was inhaled only a short period of time as an inductive anesthesia. The frogs
were then subjected to the intramuscular infection of a long-acting anesthetic, ethyl carbamate (0.50 g/kg; Wako
Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan), which was effective through the experiment. After deeply
anesthetized, the frogs were placed on plates in the supine position. As previously described [15], the thorax was opened with a pair of scissors for the skin and muscles,
and another pair of bone scissors for thoracotomy. The covering pericardium was removed with forceps to expose the
heart. An ECG was used to record electrical signals from the bullfrog heart. A silver wire, which was coated with
a layer of silver chloride and soldered to the output pin, was gently placed on the surface of the ventricle (the
positive pole) and connected to the ECG amplifier, which was of our own making as previously recommended [15]. Wilson’s central terminal, which is obtained by averaging the measurements
from the electrodes from the right arm, left arm and the left foot, was used as the negative pole. This
represented a pericordial lead detected directly from the ventricular surface instead of the thoracic surface. The
ECG waveforms were detected by an oscilloscope (TDS 1002, Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, OR, U.S.A.) connected to a
monitor (Thermal arraycorder Type WR310, GRAPHTEC Corp., Yokohama, Japan). To record the transmembrane potential,
the suction-electrode method was employed as originally described by Irisawa et al. [5]. A chloride-coated silver wire, inserted into a polyethylene tube (−1 mm in
diameter), was placed on the surface of the ventricle and connected to the amplifier. The inside of the tube was
filled with external solution containing (in mM): NaCl, 115; KCl, 2; CaCl2, 2.0; MgCl2, 1.0;
Hepes, 5.0; and Na-Hepes 5.0 (pH 7.4 adjusted with NaOH). Using a syringe connected to the tube, a negative
pressure was applied to the recording electrode to break the cellular membranes under the tube. All experimental
protocols described in the present study were approved by the Ethics Review Committee for Animal Experimentation
of Tohoku University.By simultaneously applying the ECG recording and the suction-electrode techniques to the heart muscle, we
obtained electrical traces from the middle portion of the ventricle, as shown in Fig. 1. The top trace shows the ECG with the prominent QRS complexes, although the P and T waves, which indicate
the atrial depolarization and ventricular repolarization, respectively [15], are almost indecipherable. The bottom trace illustrates the action potential of the ventricular
cardiomyocytes, which consists of five phases including “rapid upstroke (phase 0)”, “partial repolarization (phase
1)”, “plateau (phase 2)”, “rapid repolarization (phase 3)” and “resting membrane potential (phase 4)”. As
previously shown in frog hearts [15], the QRS complex and the following
wave (possibly T wave) synchronized with the rapid upstroke (phase 0) and rapid repolarization (phase 3) of the
action potential, indicating that the QRS complex and the following T wave respectively reflected the excitation
and de-excitation processes of the ventricular cardiomyocytes.
Fig. 1.
Simultaneous recordings of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and the transmembrane action potential in the
bullfrog heart. The top trace shows the ECG with the prominent QRS complexes, although the P and T waves are
almost indecipherable. The bottom trace illustrates the action potential of ventricular cardiomyocytes,
which consists of five phases including phase 0 (rapid upstroke), 1 (partial repolarization), 2 (plateau), 3
(rapid repolarization) and 4 (resting membrane potential).
Simultaneous recordings of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and the transmembrane action potential in the
bullfrog heart. The top trace shows the ECG with the prominent QRS complexes, although the P and T waves are
almost indecipherable. The bottom trace illustrates the action potential of ventricular cardiomyocytes,
which consists of five phases including phase 0 (rapid upstroke), 1 (partial repolarization), 2 (plateau), 3
(rapid repolarization) and 4 (resting membrane potential).To induce subepicardial injury, the tip of a glass capillary tube with a diameter of 1.5 mm was heated in the
flame to more than 600°C and gently applied to the ventricular wall of the heart (Fig. 2A). By repeatedly imposing the heated tube for a few sec, several overlapping burn injuries, with diameters
of approximately 2–4 mm, were made in the subepicardial myocardium adjacent to the ventricular surface where the
ECG recording electrode was placed (Fig. 2A). The trial numbers of the
injuries were decided to mimic the minimum size of myocardial infarction in rodent models, which was induced by
the coronary artery ligation [14]. Before the injuries were made, the ECG
showed normal QRS complexes followed by positive T waves (Fig. 2B top),
between which were the ST and TQ segments recorded on the isoelectric line (Fig. 2B top). However, immediately after the burn injuries were made, the ECG demonstrated a prominent
elevation of the ST segment (17.6 ± 3.4 mV, n=5), which was far above the isoelectric baseline
(Fig. 2B bottom), indicating the induction of myocardial injury. The
mechanisms by which the subepicardial burn injury induced the ST segment elevation can be explained as follows
(Fig. 3A). Due to the cellular damage, the extracellular concentration of K+ ions is elevated around the
injured cells (Fig. 3Aa) [10],
which makes their resting membrane potential significantly higher than that of the adjacent intact cells (Fig. 3Ab). This difference creates a voltage gradient between the intact and
damaged areas of the myocardium during the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle, producing “currents of injury”
(Fig. 3Ac), which arise from the damaged subepicardium and flow
towards the intact endocardium [6]. Since the currents flow away from the
ECG recording electrode placed adjacent to the burn injury (Fig. 3Ac),
the ECG vector during the diastolic phase shows a negative deflection from the isoelectric line (Fig. 3Ad), making the ST segment appear elevated during the systolic
phase.
Fig. 2.
Induction of subepicardial burn injury and the ECG changes in the bull frog heart. (A) To induce
subepicardial burn injuries, a heated glass capillary tube was repeatedly imposed on the ventricular wall
adjacent to where the ECG recording electrode was placed. (B) ECG changes before (top) and after the
injuries (bottom).
Fig. 3.
Mechanisms of ST segment changes in subepicardial burn injury and ischemic heart disease. (A) Mechanisms of
ST segment elevation in subepicardial burn injury. The extracellular concentration of K+ ions is
elevated around the injured cardiomyocytes (a), which makes their resting membrane potentials significantly
higher than those of adjacent intact cells (b). Such difference creates a voltage gradient between the
intact and damaged areas of the myocardium during the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle (b), producing
“currents of injury” (white arrows), which arise from the damaged subepicardium and flow towards the intact
endocardium. Since the currents flow away from the ECG recording electrode placed adjacent to the burn
injury (c), the ECG vector during the diastolic phase shows a negative deflection from the isoelectric line
(d, arrows), making the ST segment appear elevated during the systolic phase (d, gray waveform). (B)
Directions of the “currents of injury” (white arrows) in ischemic heart disease, such as acute myocardial
infarction (a) and angina pectoris (b). a: In acute myocardial infarction, the currents flow away from the
ECG recording electrode (pericordial lead) towards the other side of the intact ventricle wall. b: In angina
pectoris, the currents arise from the damaged endocardium and flow towards the intact ventricular surface
where the ECG recording electrode is placed.
Induction of subepicardial burn injury and the ECG changes in the bull frog heart. (A) To induce
subepicardial burn injuries, a heated glass capillary tube was repeatedly imposed on the ventricular wall
adjacent to where the ECG recording electrode was placed. (B) ECG changes before (top) and after the
injuries (bottom).Mechanisms of ST segment changes in subepicardial burn injury and ischemic heart disease. (A) Mechanisms of
ST segment elevation in subepicardial burn injury. The extracellular concentration of K+ ions is
elevated around the injured cardiomyocytes (a), which makes their resting membrane potentials significantly
higher than those of adjacent intact cells (b). Such difference creates a voltage gradient between the
intact and damaged areas of the myocardium during the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle (b), producing
“currents of injury” (white arrows), which arise from the damaged subepicardium and flow towards the intact
endocardium. Since the currents flow away from the ECG recording electrode placed adjacent to the burn
injury (c), the ECG vector during the diastolic phase shows a negative deflection from the isoelectric line
(d, arrows), making the ST segment appear elevated during the systolic phase (d, gray waveform). (B)
Directions of the “currents of injury” (white arrows) in ischemic heart disease, such as acute myocardial
infarction (a) and angina pectoris (b). a: In acute myocardial infarction, the currents flow away from the
ECG recording electrode (pericordial lead) towards the other side of the intact ventricle wall. b: In angina
pectoris, the currents arise from the damaged endocardium and flow towards the intact ventricular surface
where the ECG recording electrode is placed.In humanischemic heart diseases, such as acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris, hypoxic cellular
damage leads to the diminished intracellular concentration of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Such loss of ATP
decreases the activity of the ATP-dependent transport system, including Na+/K+-ATPase, which
normally transports K+ ions into the cell, but Na+ ions out of the cell [3]. As a result of the decreased pump activity, K+ ions are prevented
from being pumped back into the cells, which decreases their intracellular concentration, but increases their
extracellular concentration instead. This also creates the difference in the resting membrane potential between
the intact and ischemic areas of the myocardium (Fig. 3Ab) and produces
the “currents of injury” as were the cases with the burn-induced cardiac injury in frogs (Fig. 3Ac).In cases of acute myocardial infarction, since severe ischemia usually induces transmural myocardial damage
(Fig. 3Ba), the “currents of injury” flow away from the ECG recording
electrode (pericordial lead), which is placed on the same side of the injured ventricular wall (Fig. 3Ba) [6]. Therefore, as was the
case with the subepicardilal burn injury in our experiment (Fig. 3Ad),
the ECG changes observed in myocardial infarction are primarily featured by an elevation of the ST segment during
the acute phase [13]. On the other hand, in cases of angina pectoris,
myocardial injuries are frequently induced in the subendocardial areas (Fig.
3Bb), which are anatomically most prone to the oxygen deprivation [13]. Therefore, in such cases, the “currents of injury” that arise from the subendocardium flow towards
the intact ventricular surface where the pericordial lead is placed (Fig.
3Bb) [4]. The direction of the currents is opposite of that in
myocardial infarction (Fig. 3Ba) or the burn injury in our experiment
(Fig. 3Ac). This causes the ECG vector in angina pectoris to show
positive deflection during the diastolic phase, making the ST segment appear depressed during the systolic phase
[13]. Additionally, differing from a simple burn injury, the cardiac
ischemia also facilitates the opening of KATP-channels during the systolic phase [7], which accelerates the rapid repolarization (phase 3) of the action potential, significantly
shortening its duration. This also creates a voltage gradient between the intact and anorexic areas during the
systolic phase, producing currents that flow against the “currents of injury”. Since such currents positively or
negatively deflect the ECG vectors during the systolic phase, they would have additional effects on the ST segment
changes observed in ischemic heart disease.In conclusion, using the bullfrog heart, we introduced a simple model representing the ST segment changes in
ischemic heart disease, such as acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris. This frog model of heart injury
would be suitable to explain the mechanisms of ST segment changes observed in ischemic heart disease.
Authors: Galen S Wagner; Peter Macfarlane; Hein Wellens; Mark Josephson; Anton Gorgels; David M Mirvis; Olle Pahlm; Borys Surawicz; Paul Kligfield; Rory Childers; Leonard S Gettes; James J Bailey; Barbara J Deal; Anton Gorgels; E William Hancock; Jan A Kors; Jay W Mason; Peter Okin; Pentti M Rautaharju; Gerard van Herpen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Carlos Zaragoza; Carmen Gomez-Guerrero; Jose Luis Martin-Ventura; Luis Blanco-Colio; Begoña Lavin; Beñat Mallavia; Carlos Tarin; Sebastian Mas; Alberto Ortiz; Jesus Egido Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol Date: 2011-02-16