David G Brauer1, William G Hawkins2, Steven M Strasberg2, L Michael Brunt3, David P Jaques4, Nicholas R Mercurio5, Bruce L Hall1,5,6,7, Ryan C Fields2. 1. Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. 2. Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. 3. Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. 4. Department of Surgical Services, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA. 5. BJC Healthcare, St. Louis, MO, USA. 6. John Cochran Veteran's Administration Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA. 7. Olin Business School and the Center for Health Policy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Payers and regulatory bodies are increasingly placing emphasis on cost containment, quality/outcome measurement and transparent reporting. Significant cost variation occurs in many operative procedures without a clear relationship with outcomes. Clear cost-benefit associations will be necessary to justify expenditures in the era of bundled payment structures. METHODS: All laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCCKs) performed within a single health system over a 1-year period were analysed for operating room (OR) supply cost. The cost was correlated with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) outcomes. RESULTS: From July 2013 to June 2014, 2178 LCCKs were performed by 55 surgeons at seven hospitals. The median case OR supply cost was $513 ± 156. There was variation in cost between individual surgeons and within an individual surgeon's practice. There was no correlation between cost and ACS NSQIP outcomes. The majority of cost variation was explained by selection of trocar and clip applier constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant case OR cost variation is present in LCCK across a single health system, and there is no clear association between increased cost and NSQIP outcomes. Placed within the larger context of overall cost, the opportunity exists for improved resource utilization with no obvious risk for a reduction in the quality of care.
BACKGROUND: Payers and regulatory bodies are increasingly placing emphasis on cost containment, quality/outcome measurement and transparent reporting. Significant cost variation occurs in many operative procedures without a clear relationship with outcomes. Clear cost-benefit associations will be necessary to justify expenditures in the era of bundled payment structures. METHODS: All laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCCKs) performed within a single health system over a 1-year period were analysed for operating room (OR) supply cost. The cost was correlated with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) outcomes. RESULTS: From July 2013 to June 2014, 2178 LCCKs were performed by 55 surgeons at seven hospitals. The median case OR supply cost was $513 ± 156. There was variation in cost between individual surgeons and within an individual surgeon's practice. There was no correlation between cost and ACS NSQIP outcomes. The majority of cost variation was explained by selection of trocar and clip applier constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant case OR cost variation is present in LCCK across a single health system, and there is no clear association between increased cost and NSQIP outcomes. Placed within the larger context of overall cost, the opportunity exists for improved resource utilization with no obvious risk for a reduction in the quality of care.
Authors: Mary D Naylor; Ellen T Kurtzman; David C Grabowski; Charlene Harrington; Mark McClellan; Susan C Reinhard Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Matthew Gitelis; Yalini Vigneswaran; Michael B Ujiki; Woody Denham; Mark Talamonti; Joseph P Muldoon; John G Linn Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Anne M Stey; Robert H Brook; Jack Needleman; Bruce L Hall; David S Zingmond; Elise H Lawson; Clifford Y Ko Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jeffrey R Avansino; Adam B Goldin; Renelle Risley; John H T Waldhausen; Robert S Sawin Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Zirui Song; Dana Gelb Safran; Bruce E Landon; Mary Beth Landrum; Yulei He; Robert E Mechanic; Matthew P Day; Michael E Chernew Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Alfred S Casale; Ronald A Paulus; Mark J Selna; Michael C Doll; Albert E Bothe; Karen E McKinley; Scott A Berry; Duane E Davis; Richard J Gilfillan; Bruce H Hamory; Glenn D Steele Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Elizabeth M Pontarelli; Gary G Grinberg; Richard S Isaacs; James P Morris; Olakunle Ajayi; Pandu R Yenumula Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jamie R Robinson; Nicholas H Carter; Corinne Gibson; Adam S Brinkman; Kyle Van Arendonk; Karen E Speck; Melissa E Danko; Gretchen P Jackson; Harold N Lovvorn; Martin L Blakely Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: David G Brauer; Kerri A Ohman; David P Jaques; Cheryl A Woolsey; Ningying Wu; Jingxia Liu; M B Majella Doyle; Ryan C Fields; William C Chapman; Steven M Strasberg; William G Hawkins Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Christopher C Stahl; Shreyans Udani; Patrick B Schwartz; Taylor Aiken; Alexandra W Acher; James R Barrett; Jacob A Greenberg; Daniel E Abbott Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Christopher P Childers; Susan L Ettner; Ron D Hays; Gerald Kominski; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; Rodrigo F Alban Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Ashwin S Balakrishnan; Lindsay A Hampson; Alexander M Bell; Arthur H Baghdanian; Armonde A Baghdanian; Maxwell V Meng; Anobel Y Odisho Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2021-02